Sentences with phrase «view of people without»

It had a profound effect on my understanding and view of people without homes.

Not exact matches

Instead, people make discreet changes in their settings on the site to limit the views they find offensive from showing up in their feed, without provoking outward shows of conflict with people.

Currently, I practice going to meetings with an open mind and spending more time listening to people's points of view without quick reactions.

Why is it so hard to believe that rational people can view the actions of individuals and come to the same conclusion without conspiring together?

Sure, their motives were good, but if you yourself are a person of faith, would you want someone initiating you (posthumously, so clearly without your authorization) into a religion with views incompatible with your own?

I am assuming that we can appropriate this principle from Kant's moral theory without assuming the rest of it as true, including his restricted view of what a person is.

«Any person who mentions their religious view or reflections out loud or puts them in writing, without the relevant documents, could be accused of «illegal missionary activity.

I have tried to show in various ways that the notion of subordinate persons introduces a necessary flexibility into our view of mental operations, without requiring any major revision of Whitehead's conceptual scheme.

I assumed this hard - core complementarian Calvinist was just going along with the majority, just making the easiest decisions, just bumbling along without considering the views or experiences of other people so that his safe little religious world would remain intact.

Some of the sayings seem to distinguish clearly between Jesus and the celestial figure so named; one or two might almost be translated «man» in general, or «men»; some of them identify Jesus with a celestial apocalyptic figure of the end of days to such an extent that the term is little more than an equivalent for the first person singular; and others view the celestial figure almost without reference to Jesus.

If someone can not further explain an answer without being accused of attempting to change their «wrong» answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»

What a cynical, ignorant view of people to insist that, without God, we'd all be violent and immoral.

After a year of campus protests, none of us in the seminar — except perhaps the international students — could avoid guilt when someone quoted François's statement that «it may well be impossible for people who have lived and prospered under a given social system to imagine the point of view of those who feel it offers them nothing and who can contemplate its destruction without any particular dismay.»

How come some people on here claim to possess a logical and fact based mindset, yet can't explain their point of view without acting hostile and demeaning toward «religious people».

The most retrogressive aspects of contemporary society are religions leaders who have zero (ZERO) influence over extremists whose unending violence proceeds unchecked under their own banners, whose churches routinely abandon their principle mandates — the poor, infirmed, jailed, the hungry — to writers who view the thirst of people without spiritual homes as «cop outs».

The specific issue is whether in light of Cobb's general understanding of God's providential guidance we can view him as indeed present within individual persons without displacing their freedom and independence as self - determining subjects.

This general view finds its fullest and clearest New Testament expression in the Fourth Gospel, was elaborated in the great creedal discussions of several centuries later, and was finally and definitively formulated by the Council of Chalcedon in 451: «One and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, acknowledged in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of the natures being by no means taken away because of the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved and concurring in one person.

Further, people with such different attitudes as those I have mentioned are united in a common inability to listen with complete objectivity to what the texts teach us about the faith and hope of primitive Christianity, without mixing their own opinions and the views that are so dear to them with their interpretation of the texts.

There is not a more hypocritical or repulsive group than those who are not only so distressed by people accepting what they view as nothing more than a fairy tale, but who reject a higher power for lack of proof, only to cling (defacto) to the idea that everything came into existence without any sort of guidance, intent, or intelligence behind it.

We can be Bible - believing Christians without foisting our positions on others, taking them for granted or disregarding the views of people with a different epistemological framework.

Falwell's claim that his program was viewed regularly by an audience of 20 million people, a figure widely quoted during the preelection period in 1980, is totally without substantiation: in November 1980, according to Nielsen figures, the audience was 1.2 million, a figure of which Falwell would have been well aware.

This is the truth presented in Scripture, and this is the view of God which will help people work through their depression and anxiety about life without giving in to suicide.

i know there is not much to write about but people try to find some kind of» story» when there is none, national managers don, t think about the players clubs they, ll play their best players if they are available not worrying if they have a game soon afterwards they already don, t have enough time with their players so have to make most of it, i believe wenger is managing giroud, getting him fit, fresh in view of a long season and is doing it while he has most of the squad fit im sure we will reap the rewards with giroud not having a spell of 10 games without scoring.

Ignore them as they are rubbish because instead of looking it from your point of view, trying to understand why of all people, you decide Denilson was a better fit in that team vs Liverpool, they go out and bash your article without so much of a thought with (Insert Name) is better than Denilson, or degrading comments.

However, how the conflict is handled matters very much: Teens do better when they are allowed to express their opinions freely (respectfully, still validating and showing empathy for the other person's point of view), without being made to feel that their relationship with their parent is threatened.

Instead of saying, «You always...,» say «When you... I feel...» This expresses your point of view without putting the other person on the defensive.

You do such an amazing job of exploring perspectives without getting antagonistic, and honoring other people's point of view while supporting your own take.

While some parents may fear giving their child a cell phone opens the door to danger, such as the child contacting undesirable people without the parent knowing or a teenager texting her boyfriend at all hours of the day and night, other parents view the cell phone as a safety tool.

However, in campaign coverage so far, people's party political perspectives have often been conveyed in vox pops without necessarily balancing a range of voters» views.

Downvoted for «when the people of Kashmir were also of the same view» You are defining the views of them without presenting any data.

«Too much time, energy and resources were spent in the past in my view, without a deliberate conscious assessment of the impact on jobs and whether or not we were spending wisely to improve the lives of the people, communities and businesses.

In view of the fact that these registrations were not effected in breach of the law, the persons affected thereby can not be said to be benefiting from their own wrong such as to be deprived of their registration without being given the opportunity of being heard.

In the view of the Center, no nation develops its people and no people have developed without a potent administration of tax laws and its collection.

It's time to replace it with a more holistic view of health, and to empower people to prevent and treat disease without unnecessary drugs or surgery.

You wouldnt want a person to become a heart surgeon based on years of education based upon others personal views and opinions without the claims being verified?

The type of lighting truly can affect the way a person thinks and how they visualize things - so having a light source that allows you to view things clearing and without straining the eyes is important.

Virtually every blogger dream is to wake up to thousands of views, but sorry to tell you hunay — those views wouldn't automatically increase: people will not magically land on your blog without you seriously promoting your blog posts.

I've just got back from Italy, and I saw so many people standing in front of beautiful views: making sure their hair was right, getting their dress just so, taking a photo of themselves in multiple poses, then walking off without spending any time whatsoever looking at the view itself.

I went on my own, without a sponsor, and managed to see tons of shows in person so here are some of my tips, tricks, and ideas surrounding... View Post

It puts you more on display - there's not much to hide (or Photoshop), and video can display your personality and quirks, giving people a much more intimate view of who you are without ever meeting you.

too many fake profiles and scams connectingsingles.com does not look at the users profile thus so many married people and scammers hanging out on this website, the forums and profiles you can veiw without making a profile, I suggest looking at the website for several days before making a decision, I have found nothing but bottom feeders with no morals and lack of respect are abundant on connectingsingles.com... this is only my opinion best to view for yourself and come to your own conclusion because of websites like this, is where all the negative opinions come from, hard to be positive when the website caters to a select few, While the websites rules and regulations go unenforced...

Examples of positive deal breakers we've heard before might be people who smoke, people without life goals, people who don't want kids, people that work in a certain field, people that don't have the same religious views as you, etc..

And even worse is the number of people posting profiles without photos even though every senior dating site warns its members that profiles lacking photos are rarely viewed.

Some people do view profiles at these sites without the intent of finding a mate.

«If sending messages had a price or you could send only a fixed number per day, people you contact online would know you had to give up something to do so, which would incentivize better behavior,» he says.Perhaps beyond just charging for messages, sites could adjust the price according to how high quality someone's engagement seems to be.Unfortunately, without a full membership you can't respond to or block other users, use the chat function or see who has viewed your profile.If you upgrade to a paid account, guarantees you'll find someone special within six months of membership.

Share the fact that you are excited that the dating site is offering you a great way to meet the person of your dreams without the normal hassle that comes with offline dating, and show potential matches that you are viewing this as a viable way to meet someone.

Gold membership features: • There are advanced search features, so you can narrow down the list and increase the chances of finding the right match in your case; • You can look at any other profile on the site, when you want and which one you want; • You can receive messages from others, reply to these messages, or initiate new messages; • You can see full - size photos and video, plus to leave any comments for the ones you like; • You can watch any webcam you like, without any limits; • You can send friend requests and flits to the people you like; • You can create a hotlist that can hold up to 1000 members; • Customer support is provided with priority, via phone, and via e-mail, if you want, with an answer received in approximately 12 hours; • You can see when there is a contest of photographs, and you can participate by commenting, viewing and liking your favorite photos; • You can upload photos and videos to your own profile; • You will enjoy access to the available groups and blogs; • You can use chat rooms or IMs of the members to communicate in real time with them;

You can also hover over each person and see a quick view of their profile without clicking on them.

Make your search and view members» profiles without Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a

Courting is the experience of developing a deep relationship with someone, with a view to seeing if marriage is right for the couple, without the Dating is a stage of romantic relationships in humans whereby two people meet socially with the aim of each assessing the other's suitability as a