The 74 DeVos Urges Charter Advocates to Embrace Wider
View of School Choice, Warns Them Not to Become «The Man»
The AP - NORC education poll found that Americans have a largely positive
view of school choice, but know little about it.
DeVos Urges Charter Advocates to Embrace Wider
View of School Choice, Warns Them Not to Become «The Man'the74million.org/article/devos -...
Once again, the broader lens offers the more favorable
view of school choice.
I have studied Arizona's charter schools as part of a team with widely varying
views of school choice.
Trouble is that those graphs show EXACTLY what Ms. Stahl was getting at: Michigan used to score right around the national average in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), but since DeVos has been using her checkbook to support politicians who favor
her views of school choice, the state has declined in the NAEP.
Not exact matches
I can't add much to this flood
of advice except to submit, with humility, that in my
view we don't have much
choice about our fundamental emotional attitude; it is a matter
of personal character (body chemistry and the close culture
of family and
schooling), but this need not affect our
choice of creed and code if we have independence
of mind.
Our
view of the church experience was shaped by personal
choice, as we went to Sunday
school engaging in a variety
of activities, while the adults experienced church service more as a spiritual discipline.
Voters»
views at the Northern Ireland
School of Falconry in Ballymena about the
choices they face at the election.
A former councilwoman from Manhattan, Ms. Moskowitz could have been a natural
choice for a hodgepodge
of communities frustrated by Mr. de Blasio, including white voters in Manhattan who have soured on the mayor, business leaders who have long
viewed Mr. de Blasio with hostility and a diverse set
of charter -
school parents across the city.
This was, in my
view, just the latest salvo in a continuing barrage
of assaults against charter
schools by critics
of choice.
He said: «It is our
view that the
choice of subjects should be more flexible to allow
schools to have greater freedom in how they tailor the curriculum to the individual needs
of each pupil.
In this episode
of the Ed Next Book Club podcast, Mike Petrilli talks with Sam about the book, the two
schools, and how this experience has changed his
views on community and
choice.
Some
view school choice as a social good in and
of itself, while others may have indirect objectives, such as funneling public funds to religious
schools or privatizing public education.
A productive response to that question would not contemplate the merits
of «voucher programs» per se but would instead
view vouchers as one vehicle among others for growing the number
of high - quality individual
school choices available to low - income families.
Three factors have contributed to the muddled
view regarding the effectiveness
of school choice: ideology, the limitations
of individual studies, and flawed prior reviews
of the evidence.
We see only slight changes in people's
views on the quality
of the nation's
schools, for instance, or on federally mandated testing, charter
schools, tax credits to support private
school choice, merit pay for teachers, or the effects
of teachers unions.
But they also appear sympathetic to the
view that
school choice can be a double - edged sword, allowing the children
of well - educated parents to move to appropriate
schools and leaving others in poorly performing
schools.
In my
view, the big parts also need a total makeover — and would be a terrific vehicle for
school choice akin to Florida's McKay Scholarship Program — but everyone in Washington seems allergic to touching special ed, an issue that would challenge even the most politically sure - footed
of Presidents.
This longstanding and elsewhere - embraced
view is at odds with that
of many libertarians in the
school -
choice movement, for whom the State is always and everywhere to be resisted.
The Seattle
school district has been using a discovery - based math curriculum in the lower grades and clearly
viewed the Discovering Series as an extension
of those pedagogical
choices.
That is the static
view of the marketplace that induced Diane Ravitch, in her new book, The Death and Life
of the Great American
School System, to turn against accountability, charter schools, and school c
School System, to turn against accountability, charter
schools, and
school c
school choice.
The two - year long research project examined
choice programs in Detroit, Milwaukee, St. Louis, San Antonio, and Montgomery County, Maryland; African American and Hispanic families»
views of choice plans; voucher initiatives in higher education and preschool settings; and the public and private
school markets overseas.
At the other extreme, decentralized
choice systems can have severe transparency concerns, with
schools individually managing their lotteries and waitlists outside the
view of the public or an oversight agency.
I encourage
school leaders and educators to read the source material to learn more about the
views of parents and guardians on these and other issues, including
school choice, diversity, wraparound services, and more.
Money that is spent at religious
schools, under this
view, arrives there not because
of government direction, but rather because
of an individual's
choice.
My other main point is that the set
of regulations found in Louisiana's voucher program are
viewed by some
of the most important backers
of school choice as the ideal.
[52] Likewise, a comprehensive study
of families participating in Washington, DC's private
school choice program found that «parents do not
view test scores as the key metric
of success in education.»
School choice is «bad for our society» in her
view because it supposedly «undermines the sense
of collective responsibility for collective needs.»
Accordingly, we should never make the mistake
of viewing the job
of a private
school participating in a
choice program as teaching the state's curriculum or giving their tests.
Forum on Thursday evening, Secretary
of Education Betsy DeVos outlined her vision for the future
of school choice and for how federal policy could, in her
view, empower parents to create the best opportunities for their individual children.
Having a vibrant system
of open enrollment, charter
schools and some private
school choice means that Arizona parents can take the
view that life is too short have your child enrolled in an ineffective institution.
There is nothing wrong with hearing scholars»
views on the state
of the empirical literature on
school choice.
Presumably, the
choice of sectors and
schools allowed parents to obtain an educational setting they
view as appropriate for their child.
To be clear, we do not
view school choice as the panacea to solve all
of public (or private) education's ills.
In this movement, some researchers saw democracy in action as power devolved from the state to local
schools, sometimes culminating in outside stakeholder involvement.147 Many contentions about site - based management, community control
of schools, community
schools, and
school choice were based on democratic and communitarian theory.148 Some researchers and policy makers influenced by economic theory have begun to
view the relationship between
schools and communities differently.
The REACH Alliance applauds the move, and
views this legislation as part
of a broader solution to expand
school choice in Pennsylvania.
Ms. Ravitch says very badly, maybe even worse than before, and her
view, elaborated in a new book — «The Death and Life
of the Great American
School System: How Testing and
Choice are Undermining Education» — has been getting a good deal
of attention, including from Congress, which she was off to visit this week.
I also have another point
of view: I'm a public
school parent who strongly supports
school choice.
Vitter
views education as Louisiana's most important challenge and advocates expansion
of school choice options.
One
of the oddest things among
school reformers is the myopic (and often limited)
views on
school choice (and by extension, Parent Power) held by each
of the factions in the movement.
For the examined, they mark the end
of one phase
of life and influence the
choices for the next; for teachers and
schools they are a time
of public accountability and for the nation, they are
viewed as an indicator
of national success.
Most recently, in honor
of Mother's Day this past Sunday, the Friedman Foundation for Educational
Choice released the results of a national survey in which mothers (and others) were asked how they viewed vouchers and other forms of school c
Choice released the results
of a national survey in which mothers (and others) were asked how they
viewed vouchers and other forms
of school choicechoice.
This is why movement conservatives not engaged in education discussions are naturally be more - supportive
of measures such as the expansion
of school choice (because they conform to their
views that markets and private actions by families should be the deciding forces in education) than
of other reform efforts that seem to involve what they may perceive more - robust federal or state government roles, or involve what they consider to be an abrogation
of roles they think should be in the hands
of families or local governments.
And, even more problematic, for a three - part series called
School, Inc. touted the school choice view of the world without much of any intellectual rigor one might expect from a network that produces Fron
School, Inc. touted the
school choice view of the world without much of any intellectual rigor one might expect from a network that produces Fron
school choice view of the world without much
of any intellectual rigor one might expect from a network that produces Frontline.
«We
view magnet
schools as a critical part
of the
choice ecosystem.»
School «reform» in this country is well down a specific road, one that seeks to view the public school system as something of a business rather than a civic institution and that promotes choice in the form of charter schools, vouchers, etc., as well as standardized tests as the key measurement of student achievement and teacher effectiv
School «reform» in this country is well down a specific road, one that seeks to
view the public
school system as something of a business rather than a civic institution and that promotes choice in the form of charter schools, vouchers, etc., as well as standardized tests as the key measurement of student achievement and teacher effectiv
school system as something
of a business rather than a civic institution and that promotes
choice in the form
of charter
schools, vouchers, etc., as well as standardized tests as the key measurement
of student achievement and teacher effectiveness.
... the Friedman Foundation for Educational
Choice released the results of a national survey in which mothers (and others) were asked how they viewed vouchers and other forms of school c
Choice released the results
of a national survey in which mothers (and others) were asked how they
viewed vouchers and other forms
of school choicechoice.
Working and living in this space where so many
of us are advocates for
school choice, we often
view what we do from the inside out.
In an interview in today's Star - Ledger, Newark Superintendent and former New Jersey Commissioner
of Education Chris Cerf discusses the threat
of a charter
school moratorium, his
views on «boutique» charter
schools in leafy suburbs, why NJEA leaders and Save Our Schools - NJ fight so vociferously against public charters yet give discriminatory magnet schools (and their own access to school choice) a pass, the impending governorship of Phil Murphy, and how Newark charters are incubating new ideas and sharing them with traditional s
schools in leafy suburbs, why NJEA leaders and Save Our
Schools - NJ fight so vociferously against public charters yet give discriminatory magnet schools (and their own access to school choice) a pass, the impending governorship of Phil Murphy, and how Newark charters are incubating new ideas and sharing them with traditional s
Schools - NJ fight so vociferously against public charters yet give discriminatory magnet
schools (and their own access to school choice) a pass, the impending governorship of Phil Murphy, and how Newark charters are incubating new ideas and sharing them with traditional s
schools (and their own access to
school choice) a pass, the impending governorship
of Phil Murphy, and how Newark charters are incubating new ideas and sharing them with traditional
schoolsschools.