Sentences with phrase «view of the above comment»

In view of the above comment I must ask: How is the American ecomomy ever going to pay down its enormous debt without raising taxes?

Not exact matches

And when I ask for any justification of their view, I get such comments as Brigitte's above — «Christine said she can't see what people see in the Bible, so I am not quite sure why it matters.»

As for me regarding the human condition, I'd refer to my comments above about the christocentric view of human nature).

According to The Nature of the Atonement: Four Views (see comment above) this book is the classic explanation and defense of the Christus Victor view of the atonement.

In the light of our above comments we would suggest a qualification of this generally accepted view.

Was not analyzing the Manchester ss and don't really care much there but from a footballing point of view and from the words of MR wenger I understand the logic I do nt read what the media thinks neither My comment above addresses the issues we face in comparison to the two previous seasons adding in our re enforcements The 22 million question «Are the Arsenal capable of achieving 85 point come next May???» I believed we were strong last year and said it here that the team was strong and together and used the very words that MR wenger used cohesion but as the season unfolded the cracks showed up at the very beginning when we lost to west ham and it got worse as we lost pole position and every thing around us came tumbling down by February last season here comes another important question did they know and understand what happened do they know what to do this term to avoid the very same faith well we wait and see Irregardless of what happens I will support Arsenal and will keep analyzing every match my way until May so Good luck Arsenal with your endeavors and hope you do well against Liverpool keep the fight on keep the heads up and give them a good beating

My comments are in a personal capacity and don't necessarily represent the views of any of the above.»

When viewing an individual blog post, you'll now see a list of 2 — 5 links to related posts at the bottom (below the «Share and Enjoy» icons, and above the comment form).

Note: in view of the above, no more comments to Richard Drake please, as he will not be permitted to respond.

From my point of view, Tamino's focus has been on elucidating what Marcott does and doesn't say, not on Mr. McIntyre's comments — albeit the update above certainly doesn't flatter McI.

A recent legal comment, I think on this thread above, suggests that Judges would take a very dim view of that, unless it was provably accidental.

Other comments from him indicate that his view of the whole question revolves almost entirely around the «physics of the greenhouse effect» and very little from historic reconstructions — apart from the end points as per the above.

JimD, «If you see and recognize these strong positive feedbacks to solar changes, wouldn't it make sense, just from the precautionary point of view, to assume the same is quite possible for other forcings, especially when backed up by paleoclimate (my 700 ppm comment above)?

If you see and recognize these strong positive feedbacks to solar changes, wouldn't it make sense, just from the precautionary point of view, to assume the same is quite possible for other forcings, especially when backed up by paleoclimate (my 700 ppm comment above)?

From the item above it seemed the key words «optical rectification» in association with «magnetism» could produce a better background than Louis's comment so I googled and found the idea is not so fresh however that searched revealed a much tighter view of the physics including this most recent abstract --

My view of the matter is that the anger and fear displayed in some of the comments above are testimony to the extent to which Lawyers Real Estate is perceived as a disrupter throught the implementation of its Blue Ocean strategy.

But as far as the allegedly lewd comment was concerned, despite the tribunal's assertion of the band of reasonable responses test, had it not, for example, in expressing a view on what a majority of the public might have thought, in effect substituted its own view for that of the employer (as in the EAT cases discussed above)?

For comments 14 and 15 above, supporting Joshua's comments in comment 7 above, I think your points are well made and are consistent with some of Ken Adams's views on this point.

Blog Free Downloads Sponsor Resources FAQ [08.30.10] View Comments Finding Your True Career Path: The Tootsie Pop Method Many of you will remember the commercial above.

If you look at all the comments above they are made by Landlord type point of view.

Thank you to all of you for expressing your deep feelings and interesting views and comments on the above issues which I strongly agree.

If you love to watch TV then I think out in the open is perfectly acceptable, Like several others that commented, I am not a fan of the TV above the fireplace because of the viewing angle.

I pop by your blog quite often, and by the looks of all the above comments and view stats, so do many, many others.