Sentences with phrase «view properties as»

When you view a property as a product, it makes sense to brand it in a way that makes buyers take notice.

Both appraisers developed cost and sales comparable approaches to value, but the appraiser who viewed the property as special - purpose put more weight into a cost - based conclusion, while the other put more weight on his sales - comparison approach.

Not exact matches

Such borrowers will face higher mortgage rates, but they might view them as the price of admission to lucrative property markets that seem almost impervious to corrections.

You acknowledge NBCUniversal's valid intellectual and proprietary property rights in the online services and Content and that your use of the online services is limited to the access, viewing and downloading of Content, all solely as authorized by NBCUniversal.

When a branded property resonates with audiences viewers don't view it as a sellout, but as something to enjoy and share.

Wealthy Chinese view properties on MLS as stock that has been picked over and rejected by the masses, he says.

In this view, again we see the same decrease in visits to Trump properties by about 10 % overall this past year as compared to the previous year.

The Internal Revenue Service views bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as property, meaning profits from transactions are subject to capital gains tax.

Investors who sold or even traded bitcoin last year owe taxes since the IRS views cryptocurrencies as property, meaning transactions are generally taxed.

«Additionally,» it says, «these markets are continuing to draw interest from a younger crowd, as the older millennial age group is viewing property listings at a rate 1.2 times greater than the share of older millennials already living in the area, indicating strong interest from others wanting to move into these neighborhoods.»

Lenders are taking an increasingly dim view of retail properties — especially malls — as the growth of e-commerce eats into sales at brick - and - mortar stores.

Absent such a standard, the shareholder proposal rule becomes nothing less than a species of private eminent domain by which the federal government allows a small minority to appropriate someone else's property — the company is a legal person, after all, and it is the company's proxy statement at issue — for use as a soap - box to disseminate their views.

China's President Xi Jinping promised to cut China's auto tariffs and improve intellectual property protection, opening the door to negations with the United States in what will be viewed as a big win for the Trump Administration.

Although a total of $ 800,000 in real estate crowdfunding sounds like a lot, I view it as buying a $ 800,000 portfolio of 12 + different properties across the country at much lower valuations and much higher net rental yields compared to having $ 2,740,000 in one very expensive rental property in San Francisco that is now at risk of depreciating due to declining rents and new tax legislation that limits mortgage interest deduction and SALT deduction.

The most important way to view these universal problems is to ask who is to receive the economic surplus: the government as taxes, individual property owners as rent, or banks as interest?

And for Property we have our house, though I suppose I should argue that it's the value of the surplus house above our acceptable minimum that we should view as a financial asset.

When you register as a Preferred Client you can view detailed property comparisons and access other exclusive features that are not available to the public.

The U.S. is still viewed as the most stable economy around the world, making it ideal for purchasing investment properties and Miami specifically has wonderful opportunities for appreciation.»

Businesses can schedule posts on MassRoots, Facebook and Twitter; purchase advertising on both MassRoots owned - properties as well as third party digital properties; and view actionable, real - time data from MassRoots and third party sources in easy - to - read formats.

It is the Registrant's view that Bitcoins should not be regarded as coins, or otherwise as collectibles, for purposes of section 408 (m), because Bitcoins are a virtual, rather than a fiat currency (see «Bitcoin Value,» above) and, as such, do not take the form of tangible personal property, in contrast to a coin or any of the other items defined as a «collectible» under Section 408 (m).

We are talking about a time where women were viewed as property; owned by their fathers until such time that the father agreed to sell the daughter to a man when she would then be owned by her husband.

Such a view would not be quite so absurd as might at first appear: the divine temporal evaluations would seem to be no more arbitrary than those of the constitution of the primordial nature in Whitehead's view; and the divine subjective aim toward the maximum of value intensity, together with the property of everlastingness and the Categoreal Obligations (constituted by the primordial nature) of Subjective Unity and Subjective Harmony, would seem sufficient to insure the mutual coherence of the growing series of divine temporal evaluations.

Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.

Physical property of any sort was not viewed as «holy» and thus was to be relegated to the background of spiritual life, not in the forefront in any way.

Lincoln really was guided by his view of what the Constitution required of him: to fight secession; flout the Supreme Court's fabrications in Dred Scott; and in these great causes deploy all his lawful powers as commander - in - chief — including that «seizure» of enemy «property» called the Emancipation Proclamation.

In particular, these jokes reinforce the patriarchal view of a girl as someone else's «property»... her dad's, her husband's, etc..

I am alleging that in order to avoid the untoward implications of the Leibnizian view one needs to posit the concrete determinate actuality in the present (which in some way preserves its past) as that which «has» properties (CAP 168).

They include the «chilling effects» of libel suits, the perennial conflicts between property and access, the three out of four publishers who intervene in news decisions affecting their local markets, the advertisers» freedom to move their money to where their interests are, industry self - regulation in broadcasting and advertising, the backlash against conveying under duress (as in a hostage crisis) points of view that are never aired as directly without duress, the flareups of book banning and censorship of textbooks, the rout of the civil rights movement, the retreat from principles of fairness and equality (even where never implemented), the attack on scientific and humane teaching, the threat of self - appointed media watchdogs to also spy on teachers in the classroom, and the general vigor of ancient orthodoxies masquarading as neo-this and neo-that.

In short, the Nature we know from modern science embodies and reflects immaterial properties and a depth of intelligibility... To view all these extremely complex, elegant and intelligible laws, entities, properties and relations in the evolution of the universe as «brute facts» in need of no further explanation is, in the words of the great John Paul II, an «abdication of human intelligence».»

Maybe it's the difference between performing as a kid and getting older, but I view «the spotlight» as a far more public property that I ever did earlier in my career.

Patriarchy (where women are viewed as property) is one of the consequences of sin, and so this is why Jesus stood up for the rights of women.

The inequality of laws concerning punishment of suspicion of adultery, the pervasiveness of polygamy, the fact that women were viewed as property, the lesser value ascribed to baby girls, and the suggestion that women are more easily deceived than men are all striking problems for modern readers... and as Christians we should not underestimate the impact they may have on unbelieving seekers.

Some of their properties are intelligible from a substantialist perspective, so that they can be called «particles,» but others are not, so that for some purposes they must be viewed as waves without having a substrate that can be understood to «wave.»

But if, when you give up your cell, or yield possession of this or that object or exchange it for another, you feel repugnance and are not like a statue, that shows that you view these things as if they were your private property.»

And, since Whitehead defines «matter» as anything which has this property of simple location (SMW 72), his doctrine that all actual entities have prehensions that are vectors constitutes his rejection of a materialistic view of nature.

In our view, individuals should be allowed to dispose of their lives, liberties, and property as they see fit, so long as they do not infringe on the rights of others.

The Hebrew people, a people who had been born in slavery, were not likely to tolerate a practice which led to any new enslavement, but as kidnapping became a rarer and rarer phenomenon, this Commandment more and more came to be viewed exclusively in terms of the sacredness of property and possessions, and the right to privacy.

If I understand him correctly, Lewis S. Ford is very close to this Thomistic view when he conceives of parts of substances as «sub-occasions» rather than «actual occasions» which, however, have their own «persistent properties» (PS 3:109).

(Substantialism is for Muray roughly the view that the self is a substance to which certain properties, such as that the self is in community, only accidentally adhere.)

This seems to me the central matter and one can not take it too lightly especially in view of the fact that, in Carnap's treatment of modalities, only the modal property «contingent» correlates with the «factual» taken as a semantical property; all other modal properties correlate merely with L - forms.

Given the divided views of the American public, that's a dangerous situation for the republic, as the issue becomes the property of parties, rather than the property of principles that appear in both parties.

The property's modern seasonal restaurant, XIX (NINETEEN), located on the 19th floor, offers up a menu of farm - to - table cuisine and creative cocktails as well as extraordinary sweeping views of the city skyline.

Not only will he be involved in managing the property's fine dining restaurant XIX (Nineteen), known for its sweeping views of Philadelphia from the 19th floor of the hotel, but he will also oversee in - room dining as well as banquet and events menus for the hotel.

In every room, an iPad Concierge acts as a guest directory, allowing guests to view recommended activities, information about the property, important points of interest and other interesting facts.

I / WE HEREBY RELEASE, WAIVE, DISCHARGE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE the CHICAGO SPORT & SOCIAL CLUB, INC. («CSSC») and its affiliates (CSSC and its affiliates are referred to collectively as the «CLUB»), the sufficiency of which consideration is expressly acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, do hereby, for myself, my heirs, executors, administrators, insurers, assigns, attorneys, representatives, agents, beneficiaries, legatees, representatives, successors, assigns and any other persons who may make claims on my behalf (collectively the «RELEASORS») OR ALL SPORTS SERIES / PARK DISTRICT OF HIGHLAND PARK / WINDY CITY FIELD HOUSE / CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT / FITNESS FORMULA CLUBS (FFC — UNION STATION) / URBANA PARK DISTRICT / MADISON PARKS ORGANIZATION / ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL / LANSING PARKS / CITY OF BLOOMINGTON / UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN / CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS — LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL / CAMP OJIBWA / AUSTIN PARKS AND RECREATION facilities used by the participant, including its owners, managers, promoters, lessees of premises used to conduct the event or program, premises and event inspectors, underwriters, consultants and others who give recommendations, directions, or instructions to engage in risk evaluation or loss control activities regarding the CHICAGO SPORT & SOCIAL CLUB, INC. («CSSC») and its affiliates (CSSC and its affiliates are referred to collectively as the «CLUB»), the sufficiency of which consideration is expressly acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound, do hereby, for myself, my heirs, executors, administrators, insurers, assigns, attorneys, representatives, agents, beneficiaries, legatees, representatives, successors, assigns and any other persons who may make claims on my behalf (collectively the «RELEASORS») OR ALL SPORTS SERIES / PARK DISTRICT OF HIGHLAND PARK / WINDY CITY FIELD HOUSE / CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT / FITNESS FORMULA CLUBS (FFC — UNION STATION) / URBANA PARK DISTRICT / MADISON PARKS ORGANIZATION / ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL / LANSING PARKS / CITY OF BLOOMINGTON / UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN / CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS — LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL / CAMP OJIBWA / AUSTIN PARKS AND RECREATION facilities or events held at such facility and each of them, their directors, officers, agents, employees, all for the purposes herein referred to as «Releasee»... FROM ALL LIABILITY TO THE UNDERSIGNED, my / our personal representatives, assigns, executors, heirs and next to kin FOR ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, DEMANDS, LOSSES OR DAMAGES AND ANY CLAIMS OR DEMANDS THEREFORE ON ACCOUNT OF ANY INJURY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE DEATH OF THE PARTICIPANT OR DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THE EVENT (S) CAUSED OR ALLEGED TO BE CAUSED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY THE NEGLIGENCE OF THE RELEASEE OR OTHERWISE.

One of the most important ways parenting has evolved over time is that in most modern cultures, children are no longer viewed as property.

That's why the battle over the Clesen property is so important to Marshall and Kapov, who view it as the front line in their fight to preserve what's best about Long Grove.

It was only married women who seemed to be viewed as their husbands property.

Businesses are discovering drones as well: drones carry mistletoe in restaurants (with questionable results), or are used to give real - estate buyers a better view of their property.

When a property market has crashed, would you still view foreign investors as a «problem»?