Sentences with phrase «view system adopts»

Not exact matches

They see the success of The Technique in converting people to its value system, and so they adopt these techniques — especially television, radio, and books — to convert people to their own religious views.

Besides, from a procedural point of view, I don't see where and how such a system would be adopted.

In debating education reform, Goodman adopted not the point of view of The System, even less that of society or the nation (in one recurring riff, he savagely criticizes James Conant, Harvard president and education reformer, for even mentioning «national needs» alongside «individual development»), but that of the dropout, The System's rejects.

However, what we have seen since 2009, when states began to adopt what were then (and in many ways still are) viewed as America's «new and improved» or «strengthened» teacher evaluation systems, is that for 70 % of America's teachers, these teacher evaluation systems are still based only on the observational indicators being used prior, because for only 30 % of America's teachers are value - added estimates calculable.

Improvements include a larger diffuser for more efficient aero, double wishbone front suspension adopted from the RSR, a shim system allowing setup changes without new alignment, larger front tyres, an electro - hydraulically actuated clutch allowing the removal of the clutch pedal, a fuel cell that can be configured to be refilled from left or right of the vehicle depending on circuit layout, a rear - view camera and collision avoidance system, a fixed seat with movable pedal - box and energy - absorbing impact elements placed in the doors for improved safety as well as air conditioning.

The upgraded Sportage adopts Kia's latest advanced driving assistance systems, including Smart Cruise Control with Stop & Go, an Around View Monitor for easier parking maneuvers, and Driver Attention Warning.

If you've spent any time over on Apple's iPad page, you've probably seen the exploded view of Apple's five - element lens system, which was adopted from the iPhone.

So before we can objectively measure how bright our market star burns, we need to adopt a common system of viewing price change.

At its fourth session (Buenos Aires, November 1998), the COP established a joint working group (JWG) on compliance to develop a compliance system under the Protocol, with a view to adopting a decision on this issue at COP 6 (The Hague, November 2000).

From the point of view of this class — a class I'll just call «lawyers» — it's too clear for argument that (i) law has things to do so that some instrumentalist theory has to be adopted; (ii) few things are simple, so that no single theory will work in every case, whether it's «wealth maximization», «corrective justice», «contract as promise», compensation or deterrence; and (iii) the demands of practice, the solicitor's need to create relations which will be projected into the (uncertain) future and to control the risks his or her client faces, the barrister's need to conduct litigation at a price the parties can afford and in the context of the adversary system, powerfully limit the consideration that a lawyer can give to theory.

Goldstein believes that because Justice Kennedy's concurrence does not adopt the majority view that education systems must be color - blind, his decision controls the law going forward.

The Italian constitutional Court has upheld national rules which had been judged by the ECHR as contrary to the Convention, arguing that such rules nevertheless protected a different constitutional principle of the national constitution and the convention could not modify the constitution, beng it a lower rank act - so from a theoretical point of view the CJEU adopts the same approach: the ultimate decision on whether a EU act is in compliance with EU law must be taken within EU only (to make a parallel, think of the CJEU approach for WTO decisions: despite an action being contrary to WTO as decided by the appellate body, nonetheless individuals can use such illegality as a ground to void the action within the EU system)

Whichever view is adopted, this two - track system offers an interesting twist on the position we've held since the beginning of negotiations, i.e. that arbitration should be binding for merchants, but non-binding for consumers.