Sentences with phrase «view the books with»

You can easily view books with their book cover art or condense them in list view.

You can view the books with different line spacing, fonts, and themes.

This is so the reader can choose a size they can comfortably view the book with) This obviously can mean that there will be differing amounts of words on the «screen page» depending on these first two factors alone.

Once you install it, find it after it's installed, and figure out how to download and view your book with it, you must inspect it carefully to find mistakes on all of the devices (like the different eInks, the different Fires, and the iPad and iPhone).

I would normally view a book with such a title with considerable skepticism even though, as the previous blog post reveals, I've long been a believer in having a 5 to 10 % position in some combination of gold or precious metals stocks, mutual funds or ETFs, or the underlying physical metals (coins or bullion bars).

Not exact matches

He also has plans to appear on «The Late Show with Stephen Colbert» and «The View,» and will then go a national tour to promote his book.

I view reading a book as a conversation with the author.

Their workplace is frequently a pressure - cooker environment, working conditions are often poor, team members are not valued as human beings, and colleagues view one another as competitors and threats,» Mackey wrote in his 2013 book Conscious Capitalism, co-authored with Raj Sisodia.

As Rebecca Lindland, a senior analyst with Kelley Blue Book, put it: «Tesla plans require a different aperture because Elon Musk views the world with a different lens.

In 2014, GM teamed up with Google (GOOGL) to run a car - sharing pilot program on its campus in Mountain View, Calif. that let employees book and drive Chevrolet Spark EV cars.

JavaScript can add some powerful functions to your website, including allowing site visitors to view a calendar and book an appointment, make a reservation, or chat with a member of your team.

Instead of the user going to the web and facing endless opportunity for booking rooms, these companies can build more loyal users with their icon sitting in plain view on a person's desktop.

We argue in a forthcoming book that most companies with sustainable growth share attitudes and behaviors: (1) They view themselves as business insurgents, fighting in behalf of underserved customers; (2) they have an obsession with the front line, where the business meets the customer; and (3) they foster a mindset that includes a deep sense of responsibility for how resources are used and for long - term results.

As with other James Grant books, this does not so much deal with current problems, as much as educate us on how to view the problems that face us, through the prism of how past problems developed.

The global views in this book were formed by meetings with dozens of family offices in Moscow, Sao Paulo, Singapore, Tokyo, Monaco, and Liechtenstein.

Even Martin Luther tried to delete the Books that disagreed with his view of theology.

you believe in a narrow view of a god based on ancient fairy tales and that if you adhere to the teachings of a supposed son of god you will go to disneyland in the sky forever... which is damm ridiculous... I consider myself an atheist but I am aware of the possibility of a creative force which created the universe... but that god chatted with people 2000 years ago and brought out a book is childish and stoopid!

Views based on an ancient book of fiction that completely conflict with the evidence we have available are crazy.

Old Testament = Judiasm, add New Testament = Christian, add Koran = Islam but add Book of Mormon and it's Mormonism with a whole different view of the very nature of Deity.

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

My one quarrel with the book is that Thatcher does not pay much attention to the influential Calvinist view of marriage as a «covenant.»

Now he reviews a new book on ethics and writes,» [The author] agrees with what now seems to be a near - consensus among philosophers that «speciesism» - the view that we are entitled to take theinterests of animals less seriously than we take human interests, simply because humans are members of our species - is not a morally defensible position.»

Readers of Last Testament may wonder, however, what in this fourth of Seewald's book - length interviews with the man who became Benedict XVI is going to change the views of a world media locked into its own certainties and «narratives», much less the views of Ratzinger's longtime Catholic critics.

However, I still read books and articles by Calvinists and those who disagree with my views.

My book on the Atonement of God begins with a summary of three views on the atonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the atonement.

The book begins with a summary of three views on the atonement, and then I define and defend a fourth view, which is a Non-Violent view of the atonement.

The second part, which is more of a forward view, will be dealt with in the second part of the book.

For to Jews the Holocaust is not an event to read about in a few books, or to remember on a few special occasions; it is for them to confront, to agonize over, to reject and resist, to search deeply and widely for a glimmer of hope - all this with a view to a Jewish self - understanding, of which an essential part is being heir of the murdered millions, the remnant of the catastrophe.

I have friends who were genuinely concerned with the message in Rob Bell's new book, and expressed their heartfelt views with thoughtful eloquence.

With a dozen books to his credit, Hartshorne has devoted most of his attention to the exposition of what he calls a «di - polar» view of deity.

The Report refers to the book Education of India by Arthur Mayhew, the Director of Public Instruction in Bengal with approval of his personal view that the «moral progress in India depends on the general transformation of education by explicit recognition of the Spirit of Christ».

In the official course books, any social norms which are opposed to Catholic moral teaching are treated as «controversial» and presented with a range of views for and against.

In some respects he is absolutely unexcelled, even by himself in another conceivable state; in all other respects he is (to state the view reached in this book) the only individual whose states or predicates are not to be excelled unless he excel them with other states or predicates of his own.

Questions such as whether torture is permissible in Tolkien's world view, whether war is glorified (with a side - debate about how the films differ from the books in this respect), and how victory and defeat are characterised, are worth considering and will encourage readers to think more deeply about LOTR and appreciate how nuanced Tolkien's treatment of these issues is.

Rather, in my view, they are most faithfully engaged with as a collection of books written by fallible human beings whose work bears the hallmarks of the limitations and preconceptions of the times and the cultures they lived in, but also of the transformational experience of their encounters with God.

That the Bible is the record of centuries of religious change, that its early concepts are allied with primitive, animistic faiths, that between such origins and the messages of Hebrew prophets and Christian evangelists an immensely important development is reflected in the Book — this general view is the familiar possession of many in both synagogue and church.

In most books, only the final view is evident, for authors seek to revise earlier positions to conform with the final one.6 All three notions are present in the text, however, for Whitehead in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulations.

Harpur's position to me is no more unique or penetrating than anyone elses other than he got to write a book with all his views in one place.

Her recent book, The Passage of Nature (London: Macmillan and Temple Press) is an analytic discussion of what it means for anything to be a process, with critical reference to some of Whitehead's views.

As a matter of fact, Bultmann's Jesus and the Word of 1926 was prefaced with a classic statement of the modern view of history, and on this basis he states that his book reflects his own encounter with the historical Jesus, and may mediate an encounter with the historical Jesus on the part of the reader.

Collingwood interprets this characterization as follows: «In Whitehead the resemblance is more with Hegel; and the author, though he does not seem to be acquainted with Hegel, is not wholly unaware of this, for he describes the book as an attempt to do over again the work of «idealism,» «but from a realist point of view.»

Though most of what Wright explains in this book he has written elsewhere, this book puts it all together in nice, orderly fashion, so that even if one does not agree with Wright, we can hope that they will now be able to critique his view with understanding.

I agree with Wright: This is a low view of inspiration, and it implies that God gave us the wrong kind of book.

The constructive suggestions in Rosen's book are confined to the no - illness point of view, along with a plea for more research, which, of course, is needed.

«44 This statement exhibits an mischaracterization of Bergson so extreme it defies words; if ever there was a more persistent opponent of Descartes» conception of natural science than Bergson, I do not know who it might be — with the possible exception of Bergson's process blood brothers — Peirce, Dewey, James, Whitehead and Hartshorne.45 In Lowe's defense it might be said that the eight or ten books that do the most to establish just how non-Cartesian, and indeed revolutionary Bergson's view of science was were all published after Understanding Whitehead.

Unfortunately (or perhaps that's fortunately, given mankind's penchant for self - deception) God hasn't given us the option of picking and choosing what portions of scripture we can pay heed to, or to play «what if» games with what our view of Jesus would be if certain books weren't included.

This view has been advocated with great skill by Professor C. H. Dodd, first in an article entitled «The Framework of the Gospel Narrative,» published in The Expository Times (June, 1932), and then in his books, The Apostolic Preaching (1936) and History and the Gospel (1938).

If most of these people and organizations identify as complementarian, and if I represent their views by quoting directly from their books or sermons, and their fellow complementarians disagree with those views....

William Kuhns, who is the first Roman Catholic to write a book on Bonhoeffer, stands in substantial agreement with the view of Godsey.39

The most complete response to Ely's book was made by Bernard M. Loomer.24 Loomer clarifies Whitehead's view of the primordial nature of God as being with all creation rather than prior to it.