Sentences with phrase «view the public court»

Not exact matches

The Supreme Court has held that students at public schools have a First Amendment right to express their political views but schools also have a right to ensure that learning isn't disrupted.

On July 8, the public got its first view into how the U.S. Department of Labor will defend its fiduciary rule when it filed a cross motion for summary judgment, asking the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to dismiss a law suit brought by the National Association for Fixed Annuities.

Daniels» attorney, Michael Avenatti, called Trump's court manoeuvre a bullying tactic to force the dispute into arbitration out of public view.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

«During early adulthood, about half of Boomers (51 %) and Gen Xers (54 %) said they approved of U.S. Supreme Court rulings that banned the required reading of the Lord's Prayer or Bible verses in public schools; 56 % of Millennials took this view in 2008.»

Their licenses require them to broadcast «in the public convenience, interest and necessity,» and the courts have ruled that this means a broadcaster must provide diverse programming that meets the needs of its entire listening - viewing audience.

For example, as the result of law suits instituted by public - interest groups, the courts held that whenever broadcasters present a particular point of view on a matter of public importance, they also must provide opportunities for opposing viewpoints to be presented.

In reflecting upon Vashti McCollum's death, J. Brent Walker, executive director of the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, told the CENTURY: «The 1948 case that bears her name set the tone for the Supreme Court's view on the proper relationship between church and state in public schools.»

The first is that the public viewed these teams as fairly equal and were more than happy to bet on whomever was getting points and disregarding any sort of home court advantage.

I do not think he is corrupt (at the moment) but from my point of view it certainly looks like bias.Also I doubt he would want to take the point many people are making (that he cheated) into a court and open what would be a very public discussion.Irrespective of the result the ramifications of such a case would be far reaching indeed and would maybe result in a fair system where footballers and not referees affect the outcome of football matches.

New York's highest court also allowed the NYPD to hide from public view records it might have about the surveillance of Islamic organizations.

I share the view expressed by objective and reasonable members of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to enforce the judgment and orders of the court only to deliberately abort court only to deliberately abort them.

NOTICE: Effective September 1, 2017 e-filed documents in Erie County will be available immediately for online public viewing through the New York State Court Electronic Filing system.

Not a scrap of footage from NYPD body - worn cameras can come into public view, Appellate Justice Rosalyn Richter ruled Monday, while the court considers a demand from the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association to bury the videos forever, on the ground that releasing it violates a state law keeping cop personnel records secret..

It remains to be seen how dim a view the Labour Party machine takes of his public courting of UKIP, but Neil Carmichael, who will fight Stroud for the third successive election for the Conservatives, has a simple message for the local electorate:

In the Court's opinion, in view of its impact on the rights of women who wished to wear the full - face veil for religious reasons, a blanket ban on the wearing in public places of clothing designed to conceal one's face could be regarded as proportionate only in a context where there was a general threat to public safety.

Which makes it all the more surprising — NJC pushing all that aside, and assuming an arch-legalistic view, on a matter that has scaled the narrow precincts of the courts into a burning moral matter, in the public space.

Calls on the Commission, by the end of 2013, to submit a legislative proposal establishing an effective and comprehensive European whistleblower protection programme in the public and in the private sector to protect those who detect inefficient management and irregularities and report cases of national and cross-border corruption relating to EU financial interests and to protect witnesses, informers, and those who cooperate with the courts, and in particular witnesses testifying against mafia - type and other criminal organisations, with a view to resolving the difficult conditions under which they have to live (from risks of retaliation to the breakdown of family ties or from being uprooted from their home territory to social and professional exclusion); calls also on the Member States to put in place appropriate and effective protection for whistleblowers.

He said, «President Muhammadu Buhari has directed all relevant agencies to compile documents on names of all looters with a view to promptly enforcing the judgment of a Federal High Court in Lagos ordering the government to release to Nigerians information about the names of high ranking public officials from whom public funds were recovered.»

Grant Shapps said «it was clear she did something wrong in the court of public opinion», but declined to give his own view about whether she had done anything wrong, when asked by Andrew Neil on the Daily Politics.

Makarfi who was of the view that some aggrieved members of the PDP have been misleading the public also said the media misrepresented the ruling of Ibrahim Buba, a justice, insisting that the court did not declare his committee illegal.

Commission of Enquiry headed by a retired Supreme Court judge, Justice S. A. Brobbey was inaugurated by President Akufo - Addo in October 2017 to go round the country to collate views from the public for proposed four new regions.

While there is an exception for court - ordered evaluations and for consultations even without personally evaluating someone, there is no explicit exception allowing psychiatrists to tell elected officials, in public or in private, their views of a public figure's mental state.

Now, animal welfare organizations are suing the agency in two U.S. courts, demanding that the inspection reports, warning letters, and other enforcement documents be restored to public view.

Even though GSK is in the middle of multibillion - dollar lawsuits brought by thousands of patients, it still has hundreds of documents hidden from public view under court seal — a feature of the US system that leaves documents provided under discovery accessible only to the parties involved in the litigation.

Medical ethicists and the public alike accept that a mentally competent adult who is terminally ill or in intractable pain has the right to choose to be removed from a ventilator or to refuse tube feedings and hydration — a view which American courts have so far upheld.

The Animal Legal Defense Fund in San Francisco, California, and three other groups asked Judge William H. Orrick of the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California to issue a preliminary injunction requiring USDA to immediately return all the records to public view.

Research for court records online that are available on public viewing in some states and counties.

It was finally moved out of public view on Aug. 27 after both a federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, held that the monument was an endorsement of religion thcourt and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, held that the monument was an endorsement of religion thCourt of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, in Atlanta, held that the monument was an endorsement of religion that...

The high court declared, «In view of our decision that the Constitution prohibits the states from maintaining racially segregated public schools, it would be unthinkable that the same Constitution would impose a lesser duty on the federal government,» which as a legal and practical matter controlled the affairs of the nation's capital.

Just as important as all that is the political message Judge Treu's decision sent across the country, that here is a court that views quality public education as a civil right, guaranteed, in this case, by the California constitution.

32 The New Hampshire Supreme Court likewise rejected the standing of petitioners challenging the state's scholarship tax credit law, ruling that they could not demonstrate any harm.33 The following year, citing the decisions in Arizona and New Hampshire, the Alabama Supreme Court also held that a «tax credit to a parent or a corporation... can not be construed as an «appropriation»» but rather such funds retain their status as private funds until they enter the public treasury.34 That view seems to be the prevailing one in courts, so with the possible exception of Michigan, where the state constitution explicitly prohibits tax benefits for religious education, tax credits should survive scrutiny under such provisions.

In Victoria's day, no «dating,» and apart from balls and such, all of the courting would be out of public view.

Overpeck may be finding the American Southwest a bit warmer now that a court has ruled his Climategate emails can come out of cold storage for public viewing:

[Moreover,] the Court held that initiating and conducting negotiations in order to conclude an international agreement fall, in principle, within the domain of the executive, and that public participation in the procedure relating to the negotiation and the conclusion of an international agreement is necessarily restricted, in view of the legitimate interest in not revealing strategic elements of the negotiations (Case T ‑ 529 / 09 in't Veld v Council [2012] ECR II - 0000, paragraph 88; see also paragraph 57 and the end of paragraph 59 of the judgment).

In view of this, it could be argued that for the Court public access to documents requests have become not only a tool to unveil potential conflicts of interests after a decision has been adopted, but possibly also a preventive mechanism to ensure the a priori impartiality of decision - makers.

Case law of the European Court of Human Rights supposedly would endorse this view, because there is no support for the proposition that the «core area» of freedom of religion must be limited to private conscience and the freedom to manifest one's religion in private or within the circle of those who share the faith, thus excluding the public manifestation of religion.

On the matter of public interest, the court took the view that the claimant in his actions and attempts to justify them had ignored or failed to give any proper weight to other aspects of the public interest.

We will see how the court, the public and those accused of offences view the withdrawal of legal aid services.

«The registration rules further the goals of transparency, openness and public accountability in the court's view, so that outweighed any relatively minimal harm to the individuals who are forced to register if they spend money to advertise,» he says.

Last week, I blogged about the fact that Ontario's court schedules are finally online for viewing by the public.

If the High Court decision stands — and it is consistent with legal views expressed in Parliament and beyond — then after further litigation incurring further court time and cost to the public purse, it is highly likely that another bench will declare the Order ultra vCourt decision stands — and it is consistent with legal views expressed in Parliament and beyond — then after further litigation incurring further court time and cost to the public purse, it is highly likely that another bench will declare the Order ultra vcourt time and cost to the public purse, it is highly likely that another bench will declare the Order ultra vires.

As such, for public policy reasons, Courts look at any restrictive covenant with the view that they are to be considered unenforceable until proven reasonable.

The Supreme Court administers and maintains this Website as a public service to provide Court information to the bar, the public, and the news media for viewing and retrieving information only.

The Supreme Court of Canada restored the trial judge's decision, concluding that the detention and search in view of the public safety risk potentially posed:

It would appear that at least in the view of the Court (and indeed the AG) is it taken simply as self - evident that there is a potential public interest in denying electoral rights as a consequence of criminal activity.

In its consideration of the case, the court gave a clearer view than had the Court of Appeal on the subject of public interest immunity (see especially paras [15] and [16]-RRB-, which might be thought central to the court gave a clearer view than had the Court of Appeal on the subject of public interest immunity (see especially paras [15] and [16]-RRB-, which might be thought central to the Court of Appeal on the subject of public interest immunity (see especially paras [15] and [16]-RRB-, which might be thought central to the case.

There was some difference of views whether such agreements could bind courts, as evidence law is at least in part a matter of public policy.

Maybe that is not why the court has oral arguments, but what reason is that for limiting them from public view?

The Shellnutt court found that «broadcasting» includes «sending electronic messages from a courtroom that contemporaneously describe the trial proceedings and are instantaneously available for public viewing.»