From a metaphysical point of
view these positions seem to create such a dichotomy between ordinary experience and «reality» that for many the only recourse is a kind of lobotomy which divorces reality from rationality.
Not exact matches
Our
position may
seem the wrong way round to those who have a more traditional
view of monetary policy, but I want to make a few points of clarification:
The consensus
view almost
seems to be: We think that the U.S. front - end is wrong, but (for now) we'll
position as if it's right.
Now he reviews a new book on ethics and writes,» [The author] agrees with what now
seems to be a near - consensus among philosophers that «speciesism» - the
view that we are entitled to take theinterests of animals less seriously than we take human interests, simply because humans are members of our species - is not a morally defensible
position.»
Therefore, a minister who holds to the temperance
view would
seem to be in a
position of having to choose whether he will make this a major emphasis or whether he wishes to counsel alcoholics.
In
view of the emphasis I am placing on this point, one passage which might
seem to belie this interpretation of Ogden's
position should be examined.
Now we may be looking at different problems here, or have different considerations in mind; but from where I
view the matter, Bultmann's own statements
seem to evade the crucial aspect of change in scientific thinking affecting the vision of our world; and his
position, as amplified by Ogden's comments,
seems to me simply not to square with the facts, as one may glean them from hearing scientists talk among themselves.
Donald Trump
seems to take (in his own bombastic way) the Machiavellian
position, while Rubio takes an idealistic point of
view.
Since the Word of God is described as a double - edged sword which man can not control, Bonhoeffer's
view seems out of character with his overall
position.
'» [1] The Greatest Work of God It
seems fair to summarise St Thomas»
view by saying that he relied on the direct testimony of two scources, the Scriptures and the Church Fathers, rather than on the arguments of human logic, and since he found no evidence for the Scotist
position in either source, he did not entertain it.
From this the
view of St.Thomas that there is no scriptural basis to the Scotist
position would
seem to be incorrect.
The fact that different schools of thought have come to different conclusions after reading the same bible does nt
seem to register with many christians who effectively hold to the
position «My doctrine is what the bible teaches so the other
view is wrong».
Just as those who dissented from Humanae Vitae were able to use a
seeming openness to their point of
view in the process that preceded the encyclical to legitimize their
view, so too will dissenters find justification for their
positions in the debates at the Synod.
This situation does not necessitate the further inference that such a quest is impossible; but it does explain how such a
position seemed from a scholarly point of
view «safest», easiest to defend.
Some fans
seem to
view «hold - up» play as a dirty word, but buying an extra few seconds for supporting runners (which in Sanchez, it's hard to ask for much more) and dragging a CB out of
position Giroud does very, very well.
When he is in a safety zone (right and below) it might
seem to ringsiders that Ali is in a fine
position to be hit, especially in
view of those dangling hands.
While I am not prone to writing in the somewhat snarky and definitly sarcastic tone Wise employed in his Tuesday column, and although he
seemed to mostly align himself with the group at Aspen - led by Dr. Bob Cantu - that
views football as too dangerous to be played before the age of 14 (a
position with which I respectfully disagree), I did find myself agreeing with what
seemed to be his main point: that whatever measures are instituted to protect player safety will get us nowhere if the culture on NFL fields (and by extension, the high school, middle school, and youth gridiron) doesn't change.
And yes, there have been some signs of jockeying for
position — Danny Alexander in particular
seems to be on manoeuvres — but this is with a
view to a post-2015 leadership contest, not a direct challenge to Clegg's authority.
When asked about his
view of the feminist movement, he
seemed to blur his
position.
A written constitution would at least protect the civil rights constantly being eroded by a government who
seems to
view protest and action that threastens their
position as the only crime worth stamping down on.
Just remember that you'll be in a different
viewing position: You'll probably be moving your couch backwards (if you can), and you'll also be standing rather than sitting, so your TV might
seem smaller and lower.
The site of human testicles
seems a bizarre anomaly from an evolutionary point of
view, like
positioning the driver of an armored vehicle in a sack strapped to the bumper.
But then, the New York Post comes along and validates and reports a
position I have taken from DAY ONE — interracial dating isn't about exclusion, but inclusion; and choose character above color — and now it
seems previous outlets who
viewed me as hell's handmaiden for white supremacy are beginning to soften their
position.
If the automaker gets the
positioning wrong, it ends up with something like a Nissan Maxima, a front - drive car whose price
seems dubious when
viewed from above or below.
The website appears to encourage short term
views and changing
positions a lot and doesn't
seem to simulate the full trading costs (including fees) that would eat away at the gains of a individual investor that trades that much.
(yes, that little bit of voyeur in me likes to look at the 13Fs filed by portfolio managers that I really admire) What piqued my interest was that Klarman
seemed to
view BBEP as a bit of an inflation hedge, or at least that was my interpretation from the several interviews with him that referenced his
position.
As astounding as the game's environments are, it's the cars that are the real stars of the show and, whether you like to really put yourself in the driving seat with a first person
view or cabin claustrophobia keeps you firmly
positioned in third person, the level of detail is astounding and, dare I say it, truly next gen. Carbon weaves, and tire treads have been obsessively poured over and every inch of the 50 or so cars
seems to have received an almost perfect recreation.
In no instance did it
seem that he had «set up» or arranged anything, or got into a special
position to get a particular
view.
Epic exceptions in the current performance art world, such as queer S / M performance artist Ron Athey, have continued this willingness to be vulnerable and open to public
view; but no artist Donald knows who
seems to be a straight white male (whatever that means) has in recent years placed himself live in such a
position of «aesthetic» vulnerability.
Then, if we have contradictory
views on a point, to go further in debate and try to evaluate which
position seems more conclusive.
It is staggering, the number of constituencies which
seem to serve singular purposes with utter blindness to the effects of those
positions beyond their narrow
view.
Michaels
views don't
seem out of that out of line with the consensus: «His
position is that the climate is becoming warmer, but it will not turn out to be as hot — or its consequences as bad — as some fear.»
He
seems to rely on relating everything to an established defined concensus
position with an idealistic
view that peer review ensures the concensus is ultimately the correct
position.
This
position has meant that his
views may
seem controversial, but are key to understanding what du Toit and other activists working in conservation have to deal with every day:
This doesn't actually help any framing, because it still
seems to intentionally obfuscate the interesting question, whether you are starting from a
position of general acceptance of the mainstream
view on anthropogenic climate change across disciplines (as expressed in IPCC, national academy summaries etc.) or not.
The onus is now on Dominion to explain, and ideally sever, any ties the company has to the Thomas Jefferson Institute, a group that has long communicated harmful
views on climate change —
views that do not
seem to align with Dominion's official
positions on this urgent issue.
I think we can accept that peoples political
position influences their
views on AGW, there
seems to be a high correlation between conservative politics and having a denialist perspective, and also between liberal politics and having an alarmist perspective, but why?
In spite of his
position at NCAR he did not
seem to have a pre-determined point of
view on the issues at hand, and in fact told me that much of his work at NCAR is related to issues outside of global warming.
This
position is very strict and, from my
view, overshoots the mark — possibly on the basis of rather extreme assumptions of irrational consumer behaviour such as those presented in paragraph 38 of the Judgment (which, in my
view, do not
seem to represent the actual behaviour of the average consumer or would, at least, have deserved some further evidentiary support).
The reason I am writing about this is that while ordinary litigants, who go to court to assert or defend their own legal rights and interests, are perfectly entitled not to care about what the public knows about their cases, it
seems to me that public interest litigants, who ostensibly pursue matters not on their own behalf but on that of the public at large or at least of some section of the public, are, in my
view, in a different
position.
Anyone using OLED has to deal with the same issues - the home button on the Galaxy S8 shifts
position very slightly to try and stop it from happening - and it
seems Apple is getting its point of
view in first before anyone starts complaining.
HospitalityJobsOnline.com
View management and hourly jobs by
position, company, property or location; most management jobs
seem to require experience, hourly jobs include career entry
positions; includes job search advice.