Sentences with phrase «view with reasons»

Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons and information.

Write opinion pieces on topics or texts, supporting a point of view with reasons.

Not exact matches

Audiences» changing viewing habits are likely one reason for the declining ratings for live award shows like the Oscars, as more and more people cut ties with the cable packages that are often required to watch such programs either on TV or online.

A few months ago, a Microsoft executive said one reason that shipping and logistics giant Maersk went with Microsoft Azure instead of AWS was that it views Amazon as a competitor in shipping and logistics.

For all the reasons mentioned above, font sizes have increased over the last few years to the point that many view 14 px as the very minimum font size, and many sites go even bigger with 18 px as a minimum, especially when a lot of reading is involved.

Gorgeous views and harbors, the city is the second most populous in South Africa with good reason.

I have a theory about what that is, which has to do with the way Musk thinks, the way that he reasons through problems, and the way he views the world.

With almost 3 in 5 Americans now viewing shipping as one of the biggest reasons -LSB-...]

Hi all, I interrupt your regular blog viewing to bring you one of my infrequent posts, this time by a guest contributor — Alan Milner — who for reasons of job security, must remain anonymous. With no further ado: ******************************************************************* A Bank for the Taxpayerâ $ ™ s Buck?

2015 viewing: 68 Reasons This assemblage grew up with the person as the newcomer.

With good reason — he's forthright in his views on everything from equity research to the Fed to bitcoin to the Australian housing bubble.

The power to interfere with political views is immensely alarming and so effective for the same reason — because it can be used when and where we least expect it.

Although Lael Brainard's outlook on inflation reflects that of the overall view of the central bank, a large number of economists would beg to differ with the reasoning offered by the governor.

People with deep - seated and diametrically opposed views aren't the only reason Facebook debates erupt.

Cain's done and deserves to be done, and for reasons having nothing to do with his tax views.

But for many reasons Mormans are thier own religion and not Christian because thier view of the trinity, the holy spirit, and who God was is not consitent with what any other Christian really believes.

The world view behind it is also what is shared with the most fanatical and dangerous religionists in our world and is the reason for their disconnection from the rest of humanity.

A subject that has not escaped my attention, for many reasons, a subject I have long struggled with settling my views on.

But there is a systematic reason why political theories with a preferential view of self - interest have taken politics to be wholly an instrumental activity.

For this reason I would engage now in more detail with his presentation of a prominent philosophical tradition from the point of view of the different one presented by the Faith movement.

The reason in his view is that she «needs to be happy with herself, to feel all right when she meets herself».

It is for such reasons that in the past those who were deserted by a spouse were stigmatised in some communities; the fact that divorce was viewed as wrong made it easy to conflate feelings for those involved with disapproval of the objective evil of divorce.Likewise those who genuinely find that they are attracted to persons of the same sex have been unjustly stigmatised and alienated.

It's very difficult or impossible to have a reasoning conversation when different but equally valid views are not respected which is what you are doing with the «hallucination» you allege exist in beliefs you do not share.

This is in fact a resurgence in other terms and with other objectives in view — of the error always committed by Christians who intervene in the sphere of human actions to justify them and to testify that in the end man has good reason for doing what he does.

I have discovered that most atheists claim sole authority over the realms of science and reason and promote a view that belief in a creator is incompatible with them.

God in His will through history had into reality seemingly illogical or cruel events to happen in our world, but no one is spared if the purpose is for the good of humanity, wars pestilence even the holocust has a reason and purpose beyond our comprehension at our times but will be reveald in the future, The Phillipine catasthrophy for example is viewed by some as Gods punishment, we experienced the brunt of natures punishing power but it also unveiled the true feelings and concern of the whole world in helping us materially and spiiritually by aiding and consoling us that was unprecedented in history, The whole world had demostrated, to me, a kind of humanitarian concern and love that trancends races and culture, A kind of demonstration by higher being the we humans is one with Him.The cost of human lives and misery is nothing in history compared to its positve historical consequences

Since I am not concerned here with issues of adequacy or tenability, but only with showing that Whitehead did indeed hold that completed actualities are repeatable, I have no reason to discuss Rorty's views at this time.

One good reason it's worth talking about: Those beliefs have a huge impact on how we view and interact with the world — and most people have them.

If you having to force your views on others and not through winning them over with reason, then your arguments are possibly flawed, your actions do not match what you preach or the person you are talking to may over time change their view.

Trump is repellant to segments of the population for reasons that have nothing to do with his foreign policy views.

Nowhere have the weak social foundations of American liberal institutions been more evident than in the battered and tattered nature of the welfare state, and in the cynicism with which it is viewed by nearly the entire populace — from the wealthy to the poor, for different reasons.

There is no special line of reasoning needed for any of these forms of relationship because each is but another form of expressing love with a view to the establishment and maintenance of communion and for the promotion of growth.

This difference is an extremely important one to note for the simple reason that the ideas of the new reformers enjoy an increasing appeal» their notions about moral agency and the nature of the moral life cohering so well with the views about these matters that now are characteristic of American culture.

After a sketch of the standoff between views of theology as something «objective» and views of it as something «subjective,» Wood concurs with Farley's reasons for rejecting the picture of theology as universally valid «objective» truths and factual knowledge.2 He also rejects another type of «objective» view of theology, represented by Hough and Cobb, which defines theology by reference to the purposes of professional church leadership (93).

Gary: The reason I'm hesitant about your definition of «religious» is because, as you say, your definition has everything to do with your personal views and beliefs, and not as much to do with how people who call themselves religious perceive themselves, nor with the 150 or so years of academic research into religious phenomena.

For better or worse, one accepts or rejects views of this sort in a more immediate engagement, I will not say with experience but with the facts of reason - involved - with - experience.

There was good reason for their perplexity, for the theological view of man is always bound up with natural and social views of man and what had happened was that old views of nature and society had changed radically.

I do nor think there is any compelling reason for the word «substance» to be used in this context, and do not myself find it wholly appropriate, in that Bergion would have been more likely to call it an energeia as opposed to an ousia, a view which resonates deeply with Ernst Cassirer's critique of substance which was being written at nearly the same time.

The reason the OTHER despotic rulers did nt kill religious people, is because they did nt view those folks as interfering with their power.

I'm afraid I'm with Willard Quine in taking a dim view of thought experiments that for both theoretical and practical reasons seem utterly fantastical.

Perhaps it even meant a less sophisticated view in the sense that reason did not dare to deal with the sacred power.

For example, people reading this exchange with a view to assessing the validity of Madden's criticisms of my position and the soundness of my rebuttal are acting on one of practical reason's per se nota first principles» namely, that intellectual understanding of matters such as those under discussion is something worth having and expending time and effort to achieve.

The arguments you came up with are the primary reasons why Islam is viewed as a violent religion.

In a Guardian article on November 3rd the prominent Islamic scholar Tariq Ramadan wrote concerning the «debate between faith and reason, and over the virtues of rationalism»: «The Pope's remarks at Regensburg have opened up new areas of inquiry that must be explored and exploited in a positive way, with a view to building bridges and, working hand in hand, to seeking a common response to the social, cultural and economic challenges of our day.»

I would invite you to engage with the view I have expressed about defeating oppression by engaging with reason resulting in the disempowering of those that oppress and the freeing of the oppressed.

(Is it just my imagination or do many people who call Jesus «lord and master» shy away from discussions with those of other views because — acting in obedience to someone else's interpretation of Jesus — they have no reasoned convictions of their own?)

And for this reason, the question of whether this view is correct or not shouldn't be argued on the basis of conformity with the church tradition but on the basis of Scripture, reason and experience.

Sarah Klitenic Wear seems to share my concern about compartmentalization, but she in fact endorses a view of reason that identifies it with scientific specialization.

2 (1968), p. 28V «The difficulty with the view that the Principle [of Sufficient Reason]... is necessary is that we do seem able to conceive of things existing, or even of things coming into existence, without having to conceive of those things as having an explanation or cause.

An over-arching reason for experimenting with process philosophy as a contribution to feminist construction of a new view of relations is that it provides a cosmology radically different from dominant mechanistic and patriarchal world views.