Sentences with phrase «view your books by»

The device's home screen looks a bit cluttered, offering links to view your books by title, author, and date, but everything is clearly labeled.

Don't worry, you can also view this book by downloading the FREE Kindle app for your computer, iPad, or other mobile device: http://amzn.to/aUZMHP.

You can access book covers, to view your books by their, um, covers, and the time - to - read feature that will calculate your reading speed and tell you when you'll get to the end of the chapter or book.

Select from the submenu bar to view books by grouping and then select a book cover or other links that appear.

Having viewed both books by Bigelow and Boas, I decided to buy this book because it provided far more plates of Park's paintings, which is what I was interested in seeing.

Not exact matches

In addition to opening seven locations from Los Angeles to New York City, Kelley wrote The S Factor Book: Strip Workouts for Every Woman, released three DVDs and launched a line of apparel, all bolstered by spots on The Oprah Winfrey Show, The View and 48 Hours.

Kane notes that Eli Pariser, former executive director of MoveOn and co-founder of media - curating site Upworthy, has called this «The Filter Bubble,» using the term in both a TED talk viewed by more than 3 million and a 2011 book of the same title.

But when financial management - and by that we mean not just closing the books, but managing the entire business by metrics, truly understanding unit economics, and having a strategic view toward future capital raises - is left unattended, cracks in a startup's foundation inevitably start to show.

His views were also discussed in two other books, Gillette's Social Redemption (1907) and Gillette's Industrial Solution (1908), written by Melvin L. Severy.

In our view this should take the form of an equity participation, along the lines set out in the book by Mian and Sufi, House of Debt, (2014), Chapter 12.

The global views in this book were formed by meetings with dozens of family offices in Moscow, Sao Paulo, Singapore, Tokyo, Monaco, and Liechtenstein.

No one knows who wrote the bible, but it was compiled by men who included what books supported their views, then discarded the rest.

I am reading a book called Mystery of Emptiness & Love by Domo Geshe Rinpoche, and in the first chapter it says «The purpose of this book is to help you uncover the view that is holding you, rather than the view you are holding».

19th century, archaeological finds (e.g. earth and timber fortifications and towns, the use of a plaster - like cement, ancient roads, metal points and implements, copper breastplates, head - plates, textiles, pearls, native North American inscriptions, North American elephant remains etc.) is not interpreted by mainstream academia as proving the historicity or divinity of the Book of Mormon.This evidence is viewed by mainstream scholars as a work of fiction that parallels others within the 19th century «Mound - builder» genre that were pervasive at the time.

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

Webb's views reflect a perspective that is deeply held by many Americans, and his use of the standard resources of theology to articulate these views is one of the reasons this book ought not be simply dismissed.

However, I still read books and articles by Calvinists and those who disagree with my views.

Pacioni himself tells us that throughout his book he has «tried to reconstruct the framework of Augustine's speculation in all of its most original philosophical traits, following philosophical and logical - linguistic suggestions performing a point by point analysis of the texts not only from a philological but also a historiographical, cultural and logical - formal point of view» (p. xix).

The present volume is really a collection of studies, and it might easily have grown to twice its size if other topics had been included: for example the miracle stories — I should have liked to examine Alan Richardson's new book on The Miracle - Stories of the Gospels (1942)-- or a fuller study of the so - called messianic consciousness of Jesus, the theory of interim ethics, the relation of eschatology and ethics in Jesus» teachings — see Professor Amos N. Wilder's book on the subject, Eschatology and Ethics in the Teaching of Jesus (1939)-- the influence of the Old Testament upon the earliest interpretation of the life of Jesus — see Professor David E. Adams» new book, Man of God (1941), and Professor E. W. K. Mould's The World - View of Jesus (1941)-- or sonic of the topics treated in the new volume of essays presented to Professor William Jackson Lowstuter, New Testament Studies (1942), edited by Professor Edwin Prince Booth.

The Report refers to the book Education of India by Arthur Mayhew, the Director of Public Instruction in Bengal with approval of his personal view that the «moral progress in India depends on the general transformation of education by explicit recognition of the Spirit of Christ».

Reconciliation Blues: A Black Evangelical's Inside View of White Christianity by Edward Gilbreath: Those in the evangelical tradition will benefit from this honest and insightful book that weaves together personal experience and historical consideration to explore the state of racial reconciliation in the church.

In some respects he is absolutely unexcelled, even by himself in another conceivable state; in all other respects he is (to state the view reached in this book) the only individual whose states or predicates are not to be excelled unless he excel them with other states or predicates of his own.

It's an issue that has been rekindled recently by Stephen Hawking's latest book The Grand Design, which takes the view that God is somehow made redundant by the laws of physics.

A classic statement of this view was given by Steven Weinberg in his book The First Three Minutes.

His view has been examined in an able book by Dorothea Krook, Three Traditions of Moral Thought.

In one memorable paragraph we have the comparison made between a universe without moral laws and led just by human desire, which leads to a dying universe, as indicated by C. S. Lewis in his book The Abolition of Man, and Nagel's view of the universe becoming aware of itself in man, and becoming conscious of truth, beauty and goodness.

In fact the point of view taken in this book is that the mutual continuity of all actualities is much deeper and more cohesive even than that postulated by materialists.

Rather, in my view, they are most faithfully engaged with as a collection of books written by fallible human beings whose work bears the hallmarks of the limitations and preconceptions of the times and the cultures they lived in, but also of the transformational experience of their encounters with God.

During his book tour, Bell responded to a direct question about his view of gay marriage by stating that «I think the ship has sailed and we need to affirm people wherever they are».

It might seem that a book whose purpose is to present an intelligible view of religion ought to begin by stating what religion is.

Richard Dawkins, in his celebrated book, The Selfish Gene, exemplifies the same position.3 And a similar reduction of biology to a molecular science may be found in the writings of E.O. Wilson, Ernst Mayr, Jacques Monod and numerous other highly respected scientific writers.4 In Chance and Necessity, for example, Monod gives one of the most forceful renditions of the view that biochemical analysis is «obviously» the sole avenue to understanding the secret of life.5 Decades ago Jacques Loeb had already set forth the program of inquiry still emulated today by many biologists:

In their view, books stressing contingency «offer a way forward, beyond the «old political history» and the new «social and cultural history» by a reunion of process and event,» In other words, what Individual people did — perhaps especially people who filled leading public posts — may be as genuinely significant as the ordinary forces acting upon ordinary people.

In his recent and final book Catholicism and Democracy, the late Cambridge scholar Émile Perreau - Saussine attempts to defuse that anger by presenting a long view of modern Church history.

By the way, Hawking's book is a great example at how David's passionate view that Science is adjusted to reflect flaws and contradictions is nonsense.

A second type is historical (sometimes called higher) criticism, which aims to provide a better understanding of the message of the Bible by viewing its different books from the standpoint of the period when they were written and the social setting, historical circumstances, and climate of thought in those times.

You said in the article that people were mean and that Jesus loved everyone and this led to you reading books by people branded heretics and it changed your view on CHristianity and how you read the Bible..

Take the time to study both sides, you should study religion in all aspects, study it thoroughly not just from a christian book store written by christian authors, that's like studying politics from a Hitler youth book store, you will get a severely flawed view point.

In this book Küng presents «an ethically oriented overall view developed step by step through argument,» a view which encompasses the global political and economic realms.

Not surprisingly, Ex corde ecclesia is hotly debated by Catholic educators, and BurtchaelI's book may be viewed as a salvo fired from the neoconservative camp.

Such a view was accepted by Justin and Irenaeus in the later second century, although in the third century Dionysius, bishop of Alexandria, attempted to minimize the authority of the book by proving that since John son of Zebedee wrote the gospel ascribed to him, he can not have written the book of Revelation, since the two writings employ different ideas, styles and vocabularies.

Bernstein gives a number of examples of the source of this failure, as explanations of his general belief «that the authors have admitted into the book concepts and principles based on considerations not sufficiently convincing — concepts and principles based on views opposed to those forced on mathematicians by the work of Peano, Pieri, Hilbert, Veblen, Huntington» (BAMS32: 712).

As documented by Jonathan Wells's short book The Myth of Junk DNA, it was Dembski's prediction, not the Darwinian conventional wisdom, that provided a more accurate view of biological reality.

Near the end of the book, he explores the puzzle of a virtuoso violinist who loses her abilities to dementia, highlighting on the one hand his reluctance to view the loss of the abilities due to dementia as a loss of dignity, and to view her as more «dignified» than a janitor by virtue of her virtuosic abilities.

Aside from Stallknechr, he most extensive treatment of Bergson's view of creativity I have found in the literature is in the book by Ralph Tyler Flewelling, Bergson and Personal Realism (New York: Abingdon Press, 1920), 150 - 173.

This view has been advocated with great skill by Professor C. H. Dodd, first in an article entitled «The Framework of the Gospel Narrative,» published in The Expository Times (June, 1932), and then in his books, The Apostolic Preaching (1936) and History and the Gospel (1938).

This issue reached a kind of culmination in the publication in 1942 of a little book entitled The Religious Availability of Whitehead's God, by Stephen Lee Ely.22 Though it involved a technically careful and reasonably detailed exposition of Whitehead's view of God, Ely's fundamental thesis was quite simple.

If most of these people and organizations identify as complementarian, and if I represent their views by quoting directly from their books or sermons, and their fellow complementarians disagree with those views....

Churches can sometimes view events, materials, and books offered by nationally popular parachurch teachers as an easy way to expand their offerings.

Pedigree of Atheistic and Creationist Philosophy of Science Ambiguous A very positive review in the science journal Nature affirms that the new book Worlds before Adam, by the «influential historian of Earth Science» Martin Rudwick, «challenges the view that geology's development is a story of secular progress.

The most complete response to Ely's book was made by Bernard M. Loomer.24 Loomer clarifies Whitehead's view of the primordial nature of God as being with all creation rather than prior to it.