Sentences with phrase «view your system from»

Not exact matches

In many bankers» view, this gateway prevents corrupt or malicious operators from entering the system.
Today no system is complete without a mobile app, and Zoho's app allows users to view leads, opportunities, accounts, tasks, contacts, messages, calls and more from their iOS or Android device.
The marble - clad one in the Peninsula Suite, at the top of the Peninsula Tower, features high - tech amenities like a hands - free wireless telephone, a TV, and a digital radio system, but it's the view of Hong Kong Harbor (and the tiny boats scurrying across it) from 26 floors up that steals the show.
Why go: The world's largest coral reef system boasts incredible scenery, whether you view it underwater, from the air or by boat.
From the driver's point of view, the cockpit is a pleasing combination of new and old, with the multi-screen infotainment system on the center stack but the central instrument cluster analog - style old - school.
The move — from a system that «medicalizes» your health to one that «alternativizes» — is not clearly a positive one, even from an ideological point of view.
Meanwhile those with dissenting views clam up for fear of being ostracized from the community or isolated from the herd — a dangerous thing back when the limbic system evolved.
Waymo also produced a new radar system that has a continuous 360 - degree view, so it can track objects and vehicles usually hidden from the human eye, Krafcik said.
The most popular of these programs include PFS (Personal Filing System) from Software Publishing of Mountain View, Calif., and The NAD (Name and Address) System from Structured Systems Group of Oakland, Calif..
Attendees will also hear from Chris Whalen, who will offer his views on the banking system.
Having talked about liquidity from the banking system's point of view, I will finish with a few thoughts on liquidity in the superannuation (pension) system.
Last week in London, for example, an analyst from a research company with whose views I am usually in strong sympathy and who herself is very bearish on China's growth prospects, airily dismissed Chinese debt concerns by pointing out that Chinese government debt, even after adding back estimates of losses in the banking system, is lower than that of the Japanese government, and because the government's debt burden has not been a problem in Japan it won't be a problem in China.
We believe that decentralised digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum will fundamentally change how the world views and uses money: cheaper, faster and safer transactions; more privacy and freedom; a significantly better user experience; and ultimately, more equality through giving everyone in the world access to the same financial system, no matter who they are or where they are from.
Most legitimate users are transitioning from viewing Bitcoin as an alternative digital payment system to a commodity, and the same can be said for cyber-criminals.
With this in mind, the Invent + Patent System ™ can be effectively used to coax users into formulating their ideas in a more tangible way so that the concepts can move from a pure idea into something descriptive enough to be legally viewed as an invention.
While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.
The beauty of the system is that once you connect all your financial institutions from banks to IRA, 401 (k) accounts and more, your Personal Capital dashboard will aggregate everything in various views and can be customized -LSB-...]
According to reports, the risk exposure of the Panamanian banks slipped to negative from stable, largely due to views that the Panamanian banking system lacked the necessary safeguards to limit risk.
Looking at it from a taxation point of view, renting your fleet management systems is more tax - efficient.
I viewed demonetization as a net positive, because it would take cash out from under mattresses and inject it into the banking system, creating an extraordinary amount of new liquidity.
In his view, the US is moving from a system of defined benefits to a system of defined contributions.
But, if he is indeed just in charge of their email systems or something and is able to prevent his religious views from affecting his work at a heavily anti-religious organization, then I agree, it would be wrong to fire him.
Raiders and traders are almost inevitably uncomprehending or disdainful of one another, but Jacobs argues that from a global point of view, each system is valid on its own terms and each promotes the general welfare.
What about those still in the system, hidden from view by religious privilege.
The epigraph from Whitehead suggests that our views of the divine nature are a reflection of our social and political systems.
I have called this the coup de culture, in which Judeo / Christian moral philosphy (which is different from religious faith), the once generally accepted value system of the West is being supplanted by a (roughly) utilitarian / hedonistic (not in the sensual sense) / scientism - radical environmentalism view of life.
they are single, self - consistent systems of events observable from two points of view.
Whitehead's lecture on «Immortality» is seen as an example of the kind of cosmic view that comes from the generalization provided by a realistic system of education.
In an essay on «The Theology of Religion» (I.T.C. Journal, I / 1, 1974), I have argued that a theologian can have his life and thought enriched by this experience precisely because he views the faith of other persons from within his own system of belief and thought.
When we contemplate the natural world from the point of view of its creation, it appears to be the deployment of a divine plan in which matter is endowed with a natural dyna mism whose successive deployment and integrations produce an immense variety of systems and processes that make possible the appearance of the human being.
This approach of viewing axioms as defined premises (rather than self evident truths) of a mathematical system is the basis of its separation from physical world truth.
From the point of view of the advertisers, television is the keystone of our economic system.
Here we have the interesting notion fairly and squarely presented to us, of there being elements of the universe which may make no rational whole in conjunction with the other elements, and which, from the point of view of any system which those other elements make up, can only be considered so much irrelevance and accident — so much «dirt,» as it were, and matter out of place.
Signifying loyalty to an unjust system, conventionally regarded as good manners, from a more fundamental view is bad manners.
Rather than viewing each society as a separate entity moving along a track from less modern to more modern, the critics of modernization theory argue that societies interact with one another as parts of a larger system.
A transportation system that emphasizes the widespread availability of the bicycle supplemented by trucks and buses and trains is both preferable from the environmental point of view and more equitable.
Accordingly, those who have deconstructed alternatives to process thought, from Berkeley and Hume to Wittgenstein and Derida, usually decline to take the positive step of constructing a system based on a process view.
God's willing evil from man's point of view could only mean (in Whitehead's system) that man was unwilling to realize a growth in value experience.
But he fails even to allude to the radical challenges to this which emerged in the 20th century from some Pragmatists and from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with their «collapse of the fact - value system», a view now prominent in contemporary philosophy of science.
Viewing life energy from an open systems view frees us from the Freudian pessimism of closed system models and allows us to participate as parts of evolving open systems creating meaningful contextual transformations.
Get it through your head, Mr. Miller, that you can not judge the beliefs of others from your own single minder belief system's point of view.
It is indeed this capacity to exist, by belonging to a system of freedoms, which is postulated here; thereby is concretized «that perspective» (Aussicht), evoked from the beginning of the Dialectic, that view «into a higher immutable order of things, in which we already are, and in which, to continue our existence in accordance with the supreme decree of reason, we may now, after this discovery, be directed by definite precepts» (p. 112).
In contrast to the aesthetic order implicit in Kukai's view of nature and contemporary science and process thought, the «logical order» of mainline Christianity characterized by Ames assumes: (1) preassigned patterns of relatedness, a blueprint» wherein unity is prior to plurality, and plurality is a «fall» from unity; (2) values concrete particularity only to the degree it mirrors this preassigned pattern of relatedness; (3) reduces particulars to only those aspects needed to illustrate the given pattern, which necessarily entails moving away from concrete particulars toward the universal; (4) interprets nature as a closed system of predetermined specifications, and therefore reducible to quantitative description; (5) characterizes being as necessity, creativity as conformity, and novelty as defect; and (6) views «rightness» as the degree of conformity to preassigned patterns (NAT 116).
Or from compromising your value system, descending into hypocrisy, holding seemingly incompatible views all of which are in conflict with evidence...
It is important to remember that non-relating or conflict in the spiritual area frequently occurs even between spouses from the same religious tradition, but who have basically different value systems and world - views derived from their respective families - of - origin.
The difference, from the Whiteheadian point of view, is that whereas these deep ecologists think we must choose between an ethical - valuational approach to other creatures and an appreciation of our unity with the whole system of nature, Whitehead shows us the truth of both.
According to this view, mathematical systems are deductions from arbitrarily asserted (postulated) axioms and definitions.
what is necessary and a very important change for us today and the future is our conscience, and this requires global consciousness necessary for our long term needs and survival, we need a faith that will compel us to unite to address the problems of survival, in the future, a few thousand years from now the glacial period cycle is due, earth will no longer be hospitable and we either have to immigrate to other planets or, develope a system that will protect us, the natural calamities like floods, typhoons, sub zero temperatures, will become our big problem in the future, so we need a religion that will guide our conscience from simplistic self survival towards a more holistic view of reality.Our oneness with ourselves and Him is the primary tenets or doctrines of this religion.
Here is another view from two well - known (yet atheist) scientists: «Another major problem for the chemical evolutionist is the origin of the information that is found in living systems.
Formation of open - system structures (whether considered from the point of view of chemistry, or from that of process philosophy) requires structures (of some stability) to exist in an antecedent world.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z