Not exact matches
In many bankers»
view, this gateway prevents corrupt or malicious operators
from entering the
system.
Today no
system is complete without a mobile app, and Zoho's app allows users to
view leads, opportunities, accounts, tasks, contacts, messages, calls and more
from their iOS or Android device.
The marble - clad one in the Peninsula Suite, at the top of the Peninsula Tower, features high - tech amenities like a hands - free wireless telephone, a TV, and a digital radio
system, but it's the
view of Hong Kong Harbor (and the tiny boats scurrying across it)
from 26 floors up that steals the show.
Why go: The world's largest coral reef
system boasts incredible scenery, whether you
view it underwater,
from the air or by boat.
From the driver's point of
view, the cockpit is a pleasing combination of new and old, with the multi-screen infotainment
system on the center stack but the central instrument cluster analog - style old - school.
The move —
from a
system that «medicalizes» your health to one that «alternativizes» — is not clearly a positive one, even
from an ideological point of
view.
Meanwhile those with dissenting
views clam up for fear of being ostracized
from the community or isolated
from the herd — a dangerous thing back when the limbic
system evolved.
Waymo also produced a new radar
system that has a continuous 360 - degree
view, so it can track objects and vehicles usually hidden
from the human eye, Krafcik said.
The most popular of these programs include PFS (Personal Filing
System)
from Software Publishing of Mountain
View, Calif., and The NAD (Name and Address)
System from Structured
Systems Group of Oakland, Calif..
Attendees will also hear
from Chris Whalen, who will offer his
views on the banking
system.
Having talked about liquidity
from the banking
system's point of
view, I will finish with a few thoughts on liquidity in the superannuation (pension)
system.
Last week in London, for example, an analyst
from a research company with whose
views I am usually in strong sympathy and who herself is very bearish on China's growth prospects, airily dismissed Chinese debt concerns by pointing out that Chinese government debt, even after adding back estimates of losses in the banking
system, is lower than that of the Japanese government, and because the government's debt burden has not been a problem in Japan it won't be a problem in China.
We believe that decentralised digital currencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum will fundamentally change how the world
views and uses money: cheaper, faster and safer transactions; more privacy and freedom; a significantly better user experience; and ultimately, more equality through giving everyone in the world access to the same financial
system, no matter who they are or where they are
from.
Most legitimate users are transitioning
from viewing Bitcoin as an alternative digital payment
system to a commodity, and the same can be said for cyber-criminals.
With this in mind, the Invent + Patent
System ™ can be effectively used to coax users into formulating their ideas in a more tangible way so that the concepts can move
from a pure idea into something descriptive enough to be legally
viewed as an invention.
While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune
from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice
system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden
from public
view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.
The beauty of the
system is that once you connect all your financial institutions
from banks to IRA, 401 (k) accounts and more, your Personal Capital dashboard will aggregate everything in various
views and can be customized -LSB-...]
According to reports, the risk exposure of the Panamanian banks slipped to negative
from stable, largely due to
views that the Panamanian banking
system lacked the necessary safeguards to limit risk.
Looking at it
from a taxation point of
view, renting your fleet management
systems is more tax - efficient.
I
viewed demonetization as a net positive, because it would take cash out
from under mattresses and inject it into the banking
system, creating an extraordinary amount of new liquidity.
In his
view, the US is moving
from a
system of defined benefits to a
system of defined contributions.
But, if he is indeed just in charge of their email
systems or something and is able to prevent his religious
views from affecting his work at a heavily anti-religious organization, then I agree, it would be wrong to fire him.
Raiders and traders are almost inevitably uncomprehending or disdainful of one another, but Jacobs argues that
from a global point of
view, each
system is valid on its own terms and each promotes the general welfare.
What about those still in the
system, hidden
from view by religious privilege.
The epigraph
from Whitehead suggests that our
views of the divine nature are a reflection of our social and political
systems.
I have called this the coup de culture, in which Judeo / Christian moral philosphy (which is different
from religious faith), the once generally accepted value
system of the West is being supplanted by a (roughly) utilitarian / hedonistic (not in the sensual sense) / scientism - radical environmentalism
view of life.
they are single, self - consistent
systems of events observable
from two points of
view.
Whitehead's lecture on «Immortality» is seen as an example of the kind of cosmic
view that comes
from the generalization provided by a realistic
system of education.
In an essay on «The Theology of Religion» (I.T.C. Journal, I / 1, 1974), I have argued that a theologian can have his life and thought enriched by this experience precisely because he
views the faith of other persons
from within his own
system of belief and thought.
When we contemplate the natural world
from the point of
view of its creation, it appears to be the deployment of a divine plan in which matter is endowed with a natural dyna mism whose successive deployment and integrations produce an immense variety of
systems and processes that make possible the appearance of the human being.
This approach of
viewing axioms as defined premises (rather than self evident truths) of a mathematical
system is the basis of its separation
from physical world truth.
From the point of
view of the advertisers, television is the keystone of our economic
system.
Here we have the interesting notion fairly and squarely presented to us, of there being elements of the universe which may make no rational whole in conjunction with the other elements, and which,
from the point of
view of any
system which those other elements make up, can only be considered so much irrelevance and accident — so much «dirt,» as it were, and matter out of place.
Signifying loyalty to an unjust
system, conventionally regarded as good manners,
from a more fundamental
view is bad manners.
Rather than
viewing each society as a separate entity moving along a track
from less modern to more modern, the critics of modernization theory argue that societies interact with one another as parts of a larger
system.
A transportation
system that emphasizes the widespread availability of the bicycle supplemented by trucks and buses and trains is both preferable
from the environmental point of
view and more equitable.
Accordingly, those who have deconstructed alternatives to process thought,
from Berkeley and Hume to Wittgenstein and Derida, usually decline to take the positive step of constructing a
system based on a process
view.
God's willing evil
from man's point of
view could only mean (in Whitehead's
system) that man was unwilling to realize a growth in value experience.
But he fails even to allude to the radical challenges to this which emerged in the 20th century
from some Pragmatists and
from Ludwig Wittgenstein, with their «collapse of the fact - value
system», a
view now prominent in contemporary philosophy of science.
Viewing life energy
from an open
systems view frees us
from the Freudian pessimism of closed
system models and allows us to participate as parts of evolving open
systems creating meaningful contextual transformations.
Get it through your head, Mr. Miller, that you can not judge the beliefs of others
from your own single minder belief
system's point of
view.
It is indeed this capacity to exist, by belonging to a
system of freedoms, which is postulated here; thereby is concretized «that perspective» (Aussicht), evoked
from the beginning of the Dialectic, that
view «into a higher immutable order of things, in which we already are, and in which, to continue our existence in accordance with the supreme decree of reason, we may now, after this discovery, be directed by definite precepts» (p. 112).
In contrast to the aesthetic order implicit in Kukai's
view of nature and contemporary science and process thought, the «logical order» of mainline Christianity characterized by Ames assumes: (1) preassigned patterns of relatedness, a blueprint» wherein unity is prior to plurality, and plurality is a «fall»
from unity; (2) values concrete particularity only to the degree it mirrors this preassigned pattern of relatedness; (3) reduces particulars to only those aspects needed to illustrate the given pattern, which necessarily entails moving away
from concrete particulars toward the universal; (4) interprets nature as a closed
system of predetermined specifications, and therefore reducible to quantitative description; (5) characterizes being as necessity, creativity as conformity, and novelty as defect; and (6)
views «rightness» as the degree of conformity to preassigned patterns (NAT 116).
Or
from compromising your value
system, descending into hypocrisy, holding seemingly incompatible
views all of which are in conflict with evidence...
It is important to remember that non-relating or conflict in the spiritual area frequently occurs even between spouses
from the same religious tradition, but who have basically different value
systems and world -
views derived
from their respective families - of - origin.
The difference,
from the Whiteheadian point of
view, is that whereas these deep ecologists think we must choose between an ethical - valuational approach to other creatures and an appreciation of our unity with the whole
system of nature, Whitehead shows us the truth of both.
According to this
view, mathematical
systems are deductions
from arbitrarily asserted (postulated) axioms and definitions.
what is necessary and a very important change for us today and the future is our conscience, and this requires global consciousness necessary for our long term needs and survival, we need a faith that will compel us to unite to address the problems of survival, in the future, a few thousand years
from now the glacial period cycle is due, earth will no longer be hospitable and we either have to immigrate to other planets or, develope a
system that will protect us, the natural calamities like floods, typhoons, sub zero temperatures, will become our big problem in the future, so we need a religion that will guide our conscience
from simplistic self survival towards a more holistic
view of reality.Our oneness with ourselves and Him is the primary tenets or doctrines of this religion.
Here is another
view from two well - known (yet atheist) scientists: «Another major problem for the chemical evolutionist is the origin of the information that is found in living
systems.
Formation of open -
system structures (whether considered
from the point of
view of chemistry, or
from that of process philosophy) requires structures (of some stability) to exist in an antecedent world.