Sentences with phrase «viewed as an invention»

With this in mind, the Invent + Patent System ™ can be effectively used to coax users into formulating their ideas in a more tangible way so that the concepts can move from a pure idea into something descriptive enough to be legally viewed as an invention.

Not exact matches

Certainly, as Hugo Gernsback learned with his 1925 invention the Isolator - a lead helmet with viewing holes connected to a breathing apparatus - it was impractical.

Holding exclusive data rights to a network can be viewed as akin to a patent on a new invention.

When one views the world with no definite theological bias one way or the other, one sees that order and disorder, as we now recognize them, are purely human inventions.

If we viewed our religious symbols as nothing but our own imaginative inventions, we would be forced to wonder whether we could really be challenged by them or whether we could take them at all seriously.

I chose my favorite to share with the challenge, though I will likely publish my other new inventions soon for your viewing and tasting pleasure as well, so please stay tuned!

Many think it's due to the changing views of prominent experts and pediatricians — who now advocate a gentler, more «child - centered» approach to potty training — as well as the invention of disposable diapers.

Many think it's due in part to the changing views of experts about toilet training, as well as the invention of disposable diapers.

The larger organelles, such as the nucleus and vacuoles, are easily visible with moderate magnification (although sometimes a clear view requires the application of chemicals that selectively stain parts of the cells); they were among the first biological discoveries made after the invention of the microscope.

«These inventions were on the cutting edge of technology and were extremely worthy as well,» from a human point of view.

And what that means, on the level of history as well as on the level of reality, is that America, contrary to the generally accepted view, is an African as well as a European invention.»

But at around the time I turned eight, my inventions became a little more realistic, such as a robotic theater with mechanical linkages that could move scenery and characters in and out of view, and virtual baseball games.

These procedures suggest an affinity with conceptual art, but Martin also views them, and other aspects of his artmaking, as in keeping with Leonardo's advice to the artist to «look at certain walls stained with damp or at stones of uneven colour» so that «the spirit [will be] quickened to new inventions.»

If Steinberg and Foster both intuitively sensed this decentering as the keystone of Matisse's radical invention, I suspect that Hirst's spot paintings, especially when able to be viewed en masse as they are now, effect a similar visual experience.

The works on view in Georg Baselitz: 1977 — 1992 demonstrate the artist's insistence on the motif as a catalyst for painterly invention.

But American views on the subject have also been manipulated by a campaign by energy producers — mainly the Koch brothers (who back the Tea Party) and the American Petroleum Institute — to paint climate change as an invention of anti-growth liberal tree - huggers.

The Federal Circuit stresses that, as Judge Posner recognized, «the plain meaning of «server,» when viewed from the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the art, entails a client - server relationship», and points to Fig. 1 of the patent specification, which shows an analyzer server as a separate module (item 165, «program of the present invention») from the «application» (item 167).

(4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?

The four - step approach to obviousness adopted by the Court is as follows: (1)(a) Identify the notional «person skilled in the art»; (b) Identify the relevant common general knowledge of that person; (2) Identify the inventive concept of the claim in question or if that can not readily be done, construe it; (3) Identify what, if any, difference exists between the matter cited as forming part of the «state of the art» and the inventive concept of the claim or the claim as construed; (4) Viewed without any knowledge of the alleged invention as claimed, do those differences constitute steps which would have been obvious to the person skilled in the art or do they require any degree of invention?

When viewed as a whole it is clear that the claimed invention is a process which uses stored information and «cookies» to enable customers to order items over the internet simply by «clicking on them».

The economists are dismissing bitcoin as a new ponzi scheme, while technologists view bitcoin as the biggest invention of this decade.