But, mostly, it comes down to which things are
viewed as hate speech (or hate display) and which things are seen as wrong, but not the same level of offensive.
Not exact matches
Over the years since she joined Facebook in junior high school, her perception has shifted, and Facebook now feels more like a place that tries to «exploit» her personal information, even
as it fails to, in her
view, adequately address the harassment and
hate speech she and her friends see on the platform.
Allowing this bill to fly in my
views will further heighten the already polarized political environment, present
hate speech as alluring
as «whatever that is forbidden is most admired»
His words: «I urge you to use your good institutions to preach against
hate speech as well
as promote tolerance among the people of divergence
views.»
Victim status can buy special privileges and gives the green light to brand opposing
views or even mild criticisms
as tantamount to
hate speech.
Not that it is always easy to decide when anonymity is appropriate in the given case; for example, when it is used to post
hate comments in response to what is
viewed as the authoritarian government of the United States, is this the kind of political
speech that should be protected through allowing anonymity?
Recode reports that Mosseri stated that Facebook plans to take a «very clear point of
view» on a number of topics on their platform such
as «
hate speech» and «sensationalist news,» but did not define what these terms mean exactly.