Its Kindle e-reader and Fire tablets were
viewed as loss leaders, with the real prize the sale of additional content consumers would buy to consume on them — from the Amazon e-commerce retail ecosystem of course.
Not exact matches
Amazon clearly
views products like the Kindle Fire
as a
loss -
leader to keep customers happy and keep them shopping for more content.
But are they really killing a huge cash cow (from their point of
view), or is the whole book - selling business simply running now
as a
loss leader to get consumers buying * everything * from Amazon?
That kind of profit margin
loss -
leader stance «can be
viewed as a major blow to all Android tablet manufacturers who really have no way to compete since the channel mark - up would require [that] companies put their tablets at or below cost to beat the Kindle Fire price — and they still all lack the content that the Amazon storefront has,» according to the report, citing Jeffrey Brown, vice president of business intelligence at TechInsights.
Conversely, when a resume is full of «fluffy» words without tangible results, the candidate can come across
as arrogant and impressed with their own title vs. being
viewed as a true executive
leader with the vision, problem solving and strategic planning necessary to move through both growth
as well
as loss or stagnancy!