I was not aware of this history of the word, and you are probably right that it has led to people
viewing church as an institution.
Not exact matches
In this
view,
institutions such
as the
church have tended to look at the media instrumentally, ie.
Too often the debate between a Bernard of Clairvaux and a Peter Abelard is read in terms of the latter's so - called heterodoxy when it was just
as much about Bernard's progressive vision of a
church disentangled from the control of secular princes over against Abelard's more conservative
view of an ordered relation of patronage and rule between secular rulers and sacred
institutions.
From the point of
view of civilization the question of the
church seems often to be regarded
as that of an
institution which has failed to adjust itself to the world and which is making desperate efforts to overcome its maladjustments.
In this context Hans Urs Von Balthasar observed that since the Council the
Church has become more than ever a male
institution, which without the Marian dimension threatens to become inhuman and irrelevant.9 It is essential that we rediscover the feminine, Marian dimension of the
Church because
viewing the
Church as a mere organisational or institutional entity not only impoverishes her from within but also «severely diminishes her authentic religious appeal and misleads women who are seeking a legitimate and fruitful role».10 The loss of this feminine dimension of the
Church gives rise to a false feminism in the
Church - one which expresses itself in appeals for the ordination of woman.
Christian acquiescence in this fate can be measured in any number of ways: by the extent to which the
Church renounces her inherent «platonism,» thinking and speaking in the language of psychology, sociology, economics, and politics rather than philosophy (metaphysics) and theology; by the tendency to
view the
Church not first
as sacrament transcending political order, but
as a mere mediating
institution within that order; by the «political» or «clerical» temptation to equate true ecclesial reform with institutional or curial reform.
Perhaps a broader
view of the
church as an organization serving people's spiritual needs would speak more powerfully to the laity than does the picture of an
institution clutching its «patent.»
If you
view the web
as the institutional
church — a tool for the spider to catch unsuspecting victims — then the dark, looming spider must be the ones who «weave» and «maintain» the sticky
institution.