Sentences with phrase «views about matters»

To many observers white teachers held culturally backwards views about matters of discipline.
This difference is an extremely important one to note for the simple reason that the ideas of the new reformers enjoy an increasing appeal» their notions about moral agency and the nature of the moral life cohering so well with the views about these matters that now are characteristic of American culture.
Anyone can share her or his views about the matter on Facebook.

Not exact matches

He went on: «While we may always have a different point of view about what happened at the end of our relationship, the founding of the company is a matter of record and not subject to «personal perspectives.»
That view is likely biased — studies have shown interviewers tend to prefer candidates similar to them, judge candidates on fewer criteria than they think they're judging them on, and tend to let biases about matters like race and gender get in the way.
Apparently it doesn't matter to Donald Trump that many businesses and citizens are outraged by his views about illegal immigrants.
And from a fairly standard view about the purpose of the corporation, the wishes of shareholders matter a great deal.
On that basis, I find it pretty rich when people talk about the traditional view on this matter as stemming from prejudice or ignorance of how people feel.
For example, if they cared about healthcare, targeted adverts directed them to websites explaining Trump's views on the matter.
Instead, they find little stupid convoluted reasons to justify their actual views on the matter that reality - based science is actually a real cure to things we know about (thanks to the scientific method) when in fact religion offers nothing but wishful thinking.
To my mind, it accords better with what we know about the laws impressed upon matter by the Creator that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual... There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been breathed into a few forms or into one...»
And for the majority of Christians, who hold to the traditional Christian view of hell, these matters really are about (eternal) life and death.
Steven thanks for your testimony I agree with your view that homosexuality is not an orientation we are not born that way but its a choice.We can choose to live by what our flesh dictates or we can live by what God reveals through his word and by his holy spirit.If we are serious about following God we chose to follow him so it does nt matter whether gay or straight our choice is to follow God with all our heart.I have never been gay but have battled and was overcome by my fleshly desires not until i turned from them and asked the holy spirit to help me have i been changed for that i will always be grateful to the Lord.So in that sense we are no different our testimonys are important and are powerful.Thank you for your witness and may the Lord continue to use you as his vessel to touch lives and hearts for him.brentnz
Minority Christians and white evangelical Christians «have a very personal view of God, a God that is very active in their daily lives and very concerned about the things that matter to them,» Jones said.
The basic view of Tim Nichols was that «The questions doesn't matter because we always talk about the death and resurrection of Jesus anyway.»
But before moving into these matters, I must confess the other mistaken assumption I had made about the nature of world view.
At a time when men knew very little about the functioning of the human body, this view seemed to be largely a matter of commonsense.
If our lives are objectively immortal in God, as they are on Whitehead's view, we really don't have the slightest bit of choice about the matter.
If the minister is genuine about his respect for the person and his views no matter what they are, he will not harm the relationship if he appropriately disciplines the views.
Discussion groups about matters of faith emphasize that everybody's view is wanted and welcome.
if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheview has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheView has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.
If I have found anything from posting this question, its that it doesn't matter if your religious or anti-religious, people are always defensive about their views (not enough open - mindedness or politeness for that matter).
Nobody, after all, is talking about her views on policy matters.
The biblical view of salvation is not about earning salvation through works but about obedience to Jesus Christ and taking up our cross and following him no matter what the cost.
I can't add much to this flood of advice except to submit, with humility, that in my view we don't have much choice about our fundamental emotional attitude; it is a matter of personal character (body chemistry and the close culture of family and schooling), but this need not affect our choice of creed and code if we have independence of mind.
But the really strange thing about this is that the views of these two Drs Snelling, on matters such as the age of the earth and its geological strata, are diametrically opposed.
Nothing at all is settled in the Christian view of the world about a «dialectical» unity of spirit and matter of some such kind, for God, as Christian metaphysics views him, is not a part of the world but its comprehensive ground.
Many of his contemporaries view faith as a private matter, but Sir Ranulph is comfortable in talking about the «standard Protestant beliefs» that have seen him through life.
I shall not speak here about this, my own views on the matter may be found in a little book written some years ago, Praying Today (Eerdmans, 1974), in which an effort was made to meet some of the problems and answer some of the questions that personal devotion may suggest.
Often it appears in symposia about the relative incapacity of anyone to say much of anything with security about God, since everything we can say is a perspectival construal conditioned decisively by the sociohistorical situation from which one comes — a view that, oddly, always seems to be coupled with a plea to discuss the matter a lot more.
In a world where efficiency is viewed as an almost moral value and filtered snapshots of our friends» live play out daily on Instagram, the book a reminder about the importance of being present for the moments that matter the most.
Now that people in the mainline denominations are starting to talk unembarrassedly about church growth and evangelism of a fairly conventional sort, Wheeler worries that the potential exists for any emphasis on congregational studies to be misinterpreted as an outgrowth of the spirit of the times — which views local communities of believers uncritically, as in - arguably good things, and assumes that if there is anything the matter with them it is that they aren't big enough.
However, if you would like to set aside your biases, actually discuss this matter and leave the whole «You're delusional» «You've been indoctrinated» crap to the side, then we can continue... We get nowhere if you're not open to listen because you're so stuck and set in your own views about Christianity and the 38,000 + «cults» within it.
Anyway, it doesn't matter since we are a secular country, with specific prohibitions against mixing church and state (for good reason), and marriage, from a government point of view, is about financial and human rights.
There is more division about the first trimester because one's views of the early embryo are largely a matter of belief, often religious belief.
I myself bought my iPad almost solely for the purpose of spiritual blogging on the bus (which I am doing right now), and it has given me more time to think about these matters and to read a much larger diversity of views than I would otherwise.
This does not mean that realism is wholly unimportant but it does mean taking the views of Flannery O'Connor, who thought more deeply about these matters
I've gotten to know a few people in my life who hold similar views, needless to say they they're perfect no matter how bad they act, they love to complain about everyone else and how everything is other peoples fault instead of taking responsibility for something... They tend to be depressed deep down also... quite fascinating actually.
All Christians and Jews, and that meant nearly all Europeans, accepted this simple view of origins as a matter of course until about a hundred years ago, and some Christians still cling firmly to it with varying modifications.
Clearly, from the Confucian point of view, which has been most explicit about these matters, the legitimacy of rule is contingent upon the embodiment of values.
Science is about challenging views, no matter what you make up without evidence to mischaracterize science.
On this view, therefore, Christian theology can be anything said about matters of ultimate importance by those who call themselves Christian.
It's views like McDurmon that make me very scared about finding a new church, about finding any «Christian» community for that matter
In a few matters, we do not speak with one voice: We hold somewhat different views about the morality of contraception, the legitimacy of divorce, and clerical celibacy.
What about a theological view of these matters?
A market researcher I know is running some focus groups in Hertfordshire on behalf of a gluten free food manufacturer and would really value your views on a range of matters about a gluten free diet.
Ken 1945 Football is about opinions to us fans and even though I never hide from my own views and will continue to do so, I totally respect you and your views no matter how divided they are from mine.
And I said that the exact dollar amount doesn't matter, it's about feeling appreciated and wanted and there being feedback mechanisms which help me view myself as integral.
With Conte still reportedly unhappy about the number of players at his disposal, Wenger has given his view on the matter, but believes Chelsea have contributed to their own problems and has insisted that he doesn't feel sorry for Arsenal's rivals.
Thats fine that you say that but i would like to add 3 fa cups as not spineless and a community shield as not spineless as well but i do agree with you nobdy here cares about gary neville his opinion about arsenal does nt matter but i respect your views
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z