Sentences with phrase «views about the meaning»

We know Christianity is very conflicted because of the wide disparity of tenets and views about the meaning and importance on different parts and even individual passages and words of the Bible.

There are widely divergent views about its meaning, hence it is difficult to provide an uncontroversial and clear definition of time.

We all have different views about the meaning and appropriate usage of the phrase «I love you» but generally in relationships we can use it as a catch - all for the way we may feel about our partners.

Not exact matches

In just a week the video fueled 6 million views and more than 278,000 shares, meaning that about one in every 22 viewers passed the clip along to their social media followers.

Live Stories can apparently attract about 20 million people on average in a 24 - hour span, which means that ad space on a 20 - million - view story can be worth about $ 400,000.

«The point of the «about us» page is to educate visitors about your business, which means it should be interesting to read, view or interact with.

We talk about the importance of diversity, but if diversity means having the same political views as the CEO, we're doomed to a very un-diverse business.

Their business model is a digital advertising business model, and the reason why Facebook and Google had more than a 90 percent share of growth in the digital advertising space last year is that they can target advertising in a way that no other site can because they have a 360 - degree view of user activity, meaning they're tracking users across the web and therefore know much more about their users than anyone else.

Here is John Carney arguing that «There's nothing about Bitcoin that means you can't have fractional reserve banking,» which is entirely correct but bear in mind that he's arguing against libertarian bitcoin supporters who view the absence of fractional reserve banking as a desirable feature of bitcoin.

Legal expense insurance gains in popularity Reinsurance takes hard look at quake threats New pressures on Errors & Omissions could mean you wind up in court KPMG chats with Top Broker about its world view How identity theft victims» information is misused RSA helps entrepreneurs get social How to wow clients with a great meal and a touch of class

You must endeavor to appreciate what binary option trading is really all about and not just view it as a means that could possibly resolve all your financial stress instantly.

Conservatives talk a story about «freedom» when what the really mean is imposing their views on everyone — like it or not.

I agree with you about respecting people but, respecting your point of view does not mean agreeing with it.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

Just because a Scripture talks about «baptism,» does not mean that it has water baptism in view.

Many Calvinists seem to try to defend their views by simply quoting Scripture, without being willing to have a discussion about what those Scriptures actually mean.

I wonder if this twisted view of what it means to be proclaimers of Good News is more about our fear of rejection than anything else?

Male and female exist for the sake of the Incarnation; they are created in their difference and complementarity with a view to bringing about the conception of God made man and in every aspect they ind their meaning and vocation here.

For the faithful in Christ can not accept this view, which holds either that after Adam there existed men on this earth who did not receive their origin by natural generation from him, the first parent of all, or that Adam signifies some kind of multiple first parents; for it is by no means apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with what the sources of revealed truth and the acts of the magisterium of the Church teach about original sin, which proceeds from a sin truly committed by one Adam, and which is transmitted to all by generation, and exists in each one as his own» -LCB- Humani Generis 37).

Since the belief system of a parish includes not only its formal creeds but also the meanings it assigns to itself and its members as finite bodies, to learn about a church's world view — what it believes is really going on in life — one must listen to the church's stories about its own body and those of the members who constitute it.

I take comfort in the view that, if somebody is worried about it, it means they have committed it.

I mean, don't get me wrong — I love the line - items of the house like a quiet settled neighbourhood and how everyone gets their own room (Anne is especially chuffed about this) and the backyard and the big deck with a view of the mountains and especially the double - fridge - freezer - combo thing (that fridge is THING OF BEAUTY THO).

The purpose is simply to expose what I've noticed to be recurring assumptions about what it means to be egalitarian, assumptions that do not reflect my own views as someone who believes men and women should work together, without hierarchy, to grow the Kingdom in the home, church, and world.

And while the possibility of being wrong about God does not mean you can not have your views and defend them, it does mean that you need to listen to the thoughtful arguments of those who disagree with you.»

you believers babble on about nothing, get angry when non-Christians tell you your «scriptures» or your view of what Jesus (supposedly) said mean nothing to us.

Whether in private conversation, group discussion, a sermon or a speech, or in the interaction within the community, the question is whether there is, on the one side, conviction about what the gospel means and, on the other side, unqualified readiness to hear the other people and see the world from their point of view.

I would be for it if it were meant to combat the negative view of gays within the church, and to educate others within the church about LGBT issues.

To me, the sign means two things: 1) Christians have forgotten what Christmas is really all about, and 2) Non-Christians and / or atheists have the right to voice their views and not be shouted down.

It worries me how casually you can knowingly misinterpret their meaning and use your made up crap to support your point of view about religion.

I am not disrespecting their views but think about it, have you heard anything... I mean anything new from the pro-life side lately?

To say, as Joe says, that «God making evolution appear undirected is similar to the idea that he planted dinosaur fossils and created geological strata to fool us into thinking the earth has been around more than 6,000 years,» is in my view completely to misunderstand what scientists and ordinary people mean when they speak about random processes.

Bernstein sees Dewey's liberal, political outlook as completely consistent with his view that philosophy's main task is «to become practical, where this means addressing itself to the basic issues and conflicts that confront us, and making practical judgments about what is to be done» (PA 225).

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

Before we set out Whitehead's view, it should be noted that if his view really is a different way of looking at real things, then we will need to think about freedom, human action, responsibility, the meaning of life, the self, etc. in a new way.

This view underscores the rest of the pope's words after he said «I am deeply sorry» and construes them to mean something like: «I am sorry that you inattentive folks are so agitated about what I said, hut I am not withdrawing a single iota of subscript.»

In the first chapter we opened up a discussion of what is meant by the term «resurrection», and found that this quickly led us to the traditional conception of the resurrection of Jesus, a view often known as «bodily resurrection», which, with minor variations, has dominated Christian tradition for about eighteen centuries.

The modern use of the word talent as a special gift or capacity is drawn directly from the biblical parable of the talents, where it meant a sum of money of about one thousand dollars, and in either case it should be viewed as something held in trust.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

At least in many parts of Christendom the quest for meaning, the revival of historic religious convictions about man's nature and destiny, about his lostness and his salvation, and the need to realize the significance of these convictions in relation to contemporary world and life views, have led to a renewal of the theological endeavor.

I rejected a moment ago Dodd's view that for Jesus the whole meaning of eschatology was fulfilled in the revelation of the sovereign righteousness of God which was taking place in him; I find it impossible to deny the element of the temporal in Jesus» thought about the judgment and the kingdom.

Religion = Sentient power In the article's example «When I talk about God, I mean love and justice and reconciliation, not a man in the sky»; that person still views these things as a sentient force.

Now, this does not necessarily mean everyone who voted for Donald Trump changed their views about character.

The Bible presents a variety of points of view about God and what it means to walk in his ways.

I'm upsetting apple carts I didn't even mean to upset, apparently making theological statements about views I didn't even know existed.

All marriages are «mixed marriages» (in that all couples come from differing family backgrounds and world - views); but when there are deep disagreements about the core meanings of existence, a couple must work doubly hard to establish creative closeness.

The direct evidence consists of what Whitehead himself tells us, first, about how his books are meant to be read and understood, about the genesis of his ideas, and about modifications in his views; and second, about the nature of his thinking, about his difficulties in translating his thoughts into words, about the sources of his philosophical terminology, and about the peculiar manner in which he composed his books.

That means they are unintimidated by secular France and do not feel the need to acquiesce to the dwindling band of progressive Catholics and their views about how practicing Catholics and the Church should behave.

Whitehead's statements about the singularity of the primordial nature, the advocate of the societal view may observe in response, can mean two different things.

Rather, whatever his own view of «metaphysical compliments,» I will take it to mean that everything I want to say about God should be expressible in terms of the basic principles of the system.

In the dominant world view the inclusion of human beings in nature meant that all these ideas about God acting in the hearts and minds of believers became irrelevant.