Sentences with phrase «views have caused»

I think his views have caused a stir in the regional climate model community.

Affirmative action, from my point of view has caused jobs being given to unqualified people sometimes and has caused resentment instead of understanding.

Their «takeover» & subsequent suppression of dissenting views has caused politicalization, paralysis & even regression of climate - change science since ~ 1990.

Not exact matches

But for Poloz, that would be attacking a symptom of the post-crisis malaise, rather than the cause, which in his view is weak exports and business spending.

In my view, the Chinese would not be terribly upset to see the US dragged into a war that would weaken Washington if it lost and would cause massive casualties on all sides if it won.

The company admitted that its blue checkmark, which was introduced in 2009, has caused «confusion» as people think it means that Twitter backs a person's view.

«People seem to have a more stable view of economic conditions, which is causing an influx of work coming our way,» says Eric Weishaar, president of the Breckinridge Landscape Group, a company in New Berlin, Wisconsin, with revenue between $ 5 and $ 6 million.

When I have well established patterns of thought the heretical views are often the most helpful because they cause me to challenge my own beliefs.

People like Vinod Khosla, Keith Rabois, Brian Singerman, Marc Andreessen and others have all made head - scratching private comments to me that sounded so foreign to what I thought other people were doing in VC that they caused me to challenge and ultimately change some of my own views.

Product centricity causes selling organizations to not only focus on the merits of their product but also to have prescribed views of existing customer and prospective buyer needs.

The fact that these records are gathered without the government having any reasonable suspicion or probable cause justifying the seizure of data is so divorced from the domain of reason as to be incapable of ever being made lawful at all, and this view was endorsed as recently as today by the federal government's Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight board.

Collectively, these failures have caused Apple's earnings multiple to stay irrationally discounted, in our view.

However, given the recent deterioration in the growth outlook in Europe and several Emerging Market countries, our view is that Canada's larger share of exports will likely have a relatively larger «negative» impact on Canadian growth, and by inference cause the BoC to be more cautious raising policy rates than the Fed.

It has been a salutary experience, and it has caused many of us to re-examine some cherished views.

The linking of Asian currencies to the US dollar has caused some consternation in both the US and Europe with the G7 statement being viewed by the market as a veiled attack on the exchange rate policies of a number of Asian countries.

The ill - fated chart approach has caused many casual investors to lose a bundle, after all — how can you profitably drive your portfolio if you're focused on the rear view mirror?

Atheist reject the idea of a god and believe their view to be true or they would be agnostic unless they choose no stance at all of a god that of which would require unknowing of what the term «god» means so it would fall under a belief and since they can't prove that a god doesn't exist then by definition it requires faith for their view, meaning it would effect their view of the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe if a god was proven to be true.

The concern is that singling out Christians would cause our allies in the region to view our humanitarian efforts as sectarian.

Belief in God would mean you (again, not you personally but in general) believe God has everything to do with the universe it can't be proven so requires faith but if God was proven to not exist it would effect your view of cause, nature, and purpose of the universe....

What many do a poor job of stating is that they blame people's excessively fervent beliefs and devotions for causing the various atrocities they have caused throughout history, and the effect that the fundamentalist contingent has on the narrowing of modern societies view.

From that view, what meaning does cause and effect have?

To my mind, it accords better with what we know about the laws impressed upon matter by the Creator that the production and extinction of the past and present inhabitants of the world should have been due to secondary causes, like those determining the birth and death of the individual... There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been breathed into a few forms or into one...»

I find these views to be far more destructive to the cause of Christ than anything Olstein has come up with.

This discussion of standards and excellence has caused me to examine my own view of the issue.

The widely assumed contrary view has two major causes.

If you changed your views on the use of nuclear power and had insider information that had caused that change of views or supported it, then you would be ethically correct to speak out on the matter whether still an employee or not.

The Christian view is that everything that begins to exist has a cause.

The sense of outrage that caused the Christians of Europe to hang their priests during the black plagues (since they could not kill God, at least they could kill his representatives) has touched us all as we view the suffering of the innocent.

Another cause has been the insidious notion (greatly encouraged by successive governments but particularly under New Labour - Old Labour tended to be much more traditional in its views on the family) that the family has many forms, that marriage is just one option, and that lone parenting is just as «valid» (dread word) a form as any other.

None of these «pulpit experts» would know the slightest thing about economics or what caused the recession, but this is no way constrains thme from giving their views on it.

You wise Scientist — Can you please scientifically explain to me where did the stuff came from that caused the «BIG BANG» — if you can not do that your so called science are based on a belief and not on facts as you so eagerly would like to promote — so — then your view is also based on faith and not science, because science should be able to observed and tested, but faith must be taken and believed.

It's utterly ridiculous, but they have statistics to prove that gay teenagers are more likely to commit suicide than straight teenagers therefore being gay must make you more likely to commit suicide, no further examination of causes is necessary as this supports their bigoted view of the world.

Has the false notion of an adversarial relationship between science and religion caused such division in subscribed beliefs that one can no longer view science and the belief in a superior intellect as a harmonious precept?

I am saying that just because something might have a secondary side effect of avoiding violence one day can not be viewed as a true violence reducer when on another day that something is the actual cause of violence.

From a contemporary Buddhist point of view, which would never be included in the journalistic scope of this blog, this «new» discovery is not anything groundbreaking, it simply reinforces the laws of cause and effect.

Just because something might have a secondary side effect of avoiding violence one day can not be viewed as a true violence reducer when on another day that something is the actual cause of violence.

According to this point of view, the problem drinker's behavior is quite involuntary; it is caused by conditions over which she or he has no control.

In my view, there are at least six key factors which have caused and continue to affect a global transformation of consciousness: the revolution in communications, globalization of the economy, a growing awareness of the degradation of the environment, demographic shifts, the threat of nuclear destruction and the advent of the new science.

yo tom tom, ur what i like to call a lost cause, only the Lord himself could change your point of view, so why do nt u get out of here at least John has a future in his afterlife

In this view, America has a vital role to play in world affairs not because it is the home of a chosen people but because it has vast resources, has caused many of the problems currently facing the world, and simply as part of the community of nations has a responsibility to help alleviate the world's problems.

Muslims in general if left alone with out your intervention might end up fighting each other due differences of views in their faith, but if west keep on applying pressure causing starvation, harassment and confrontation against Muslims and against their faith, this will only lead them to leave behind their differences and jointly or individually confront their enemies, those who wants to deprive them from their rights of faith and belief and the more they are pressed the more they would complain by reacting and not by words and cries since words and cries seem does not reach, heard or work out now a days since being their judges and executors are all of non religious such as atheists, infidels, polytheists who consider their vast interests above all humanity and faith issues such as mercy, leniency, compassion, pity, sympathy, kindness all that of human mutual heavenly code of conduct.!?

The result is a scheme containing nine basic possibilities ranging from a view of God as the independent cause of the world, absolutely perfect in all respects, to a view of God as pure relativity, wholly bound up with the world process and having no element of independence, necessity, or self - existence.8 Hartshorne's position proves to be the perfect embodiment of the «golden mean,» incorporating all the positive features of the various possibilities, but excluding their (arbitrary) negations.

My personal view is that there had to be a cause and effect.

They recognised further that this theological crisis had been caused by the gradual breakdown of what is known as «the neo-scholastic synthesis» which until the middle part of this century had formed the intellectual basis of Catholic belief and of a unified Catholic view of reality.

2 (1968), p. 28V «The difficulty with the view that the Principle [of Sufficient Reason]... is necessary is that we do seem able to conceive of things existing, or even of things coming into existence, without having to conceive of those things as having an explanation or cause.

He has a take on angels, Satan, and demons which I have never heard before, and which seems to fit the biblical text in a way that, if true, would cause me to read much of Scripture in a whole different way, and which would cause me to view life, and governments, and cities, and politics, and animals, and plants and pretty much everything in a whole new way also.

In fact, Russell thinks that the death of Whitehead's younger son, Eric, in air combat in 1918, significantly shifted his views: «The pain of this loss had a great deal to do with turning his thoughts, to philosophy and with causing him to seek ways of escaping from belief in a merely mechanistic universe.»

The difference is not quite clear, for Bultmann had originally defined the mythical world view as one which left room for extra — and supramundane interventions, in contrast to the modern world view which postulates a rigid, closed system of cause and effect.

That shift has dismayed those who believe that this is a moment for the hierarchy to announce the church's views on the economy with the same vigor that it promotes other causes.

(6) This emphasis on self - responsibility seeks to counteract a major cause of unwellness in Western societies — the «medical model» in which people view themselves as passive «patients» and view physicians as having primary responsibility for their health and healing.