Sentences with phrase «views of a lot of people»

A reader recently wrote a comment which I imagine reflects the views of a lot of people: I'm confused about the goals of the CNA [Child Nutrition Act, the legislation governing school breakfast and lunch, among other programs].

Not exact matches

Blodget: And how do you look at brand versus direct response because a lot of people will say that digital is fantastic from a direct response point of view - tough to build brand.

ut the company — whose machines are designed to supplement rather than supplant human security guards, and take care of monotonous tasks like scanning license plates in a parking lot — also has a closer view than most of the emerging and unpredictable world of robot - people interactions.

Q: This has raised a lot of uncomfortable conversations for people around this country who view you as their idol.

There are a lot of different ways people view hashtags and social media — some think they're overbearing, some think they're simply wonderful, some are in between or indifferent.

«Whether the result of religious upbringing or poor sex ed in our school systems, there are a lot of people with a negative view of sex.

More than that, there is a lot of terrible advice that has led people to view email marketing as spam.

It's hard to know the effect on sales, but lots of people have been drawn to an Amazon page for the «Avery Durable View Binder with 2 Inch EZ - Turn Ring.»

A lot of people lost a lot of money in the late 90s investing in page views.

One thing I've found to be true at a lot of social networks is that people on those networks love to view and click content that applies to the network.

A video of a building on fire generates lots of views, but not many people would click on the headline «Fewer buildings burned down this year.»

A lot of people seem to hold this view but, at the end of the day, it really depends on what you're trying to achieve and how you're trying to achieve it.

I suspect a lot of people don't participate in meetings because they view them as counter-productive time - sinks.

A lot of people view ICOs as an asset class like stocks, bonds or real estate.

There are lots of people with those views hovering around the Paul camp.

A lot of people who believe in the individual election to eternal life view say they do not believe in double predestination because of how repulsive it is, but to me, it seems the logical conclusion.

I don't need a lot of left hand view and right hand view categorizing and have myself labeled in some other way again that some people have recently devised.

This is the point of view of an elitist from the first world with total disregard to the circu.mstances of lots and lots of people in much more difficult circ.umstances in the rest of the world who have neither the leisure time, education, literacy, or resources to «study» any religion, let alone choose yours to study.

Yeah, I have lots of questions too, and know that while my attempts at answers will not be satisfactory to all (they don't fully satisfy me either), I hope that what I write can help move people toward a deeper conversation about these things and a way of viewing God that looks like Jesus on the cross.

It views the minister as a person who has various skills — such as in counseling, proclamation and organization — but not a whole lot of content or theological understanding.

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

A lot of people highly disagree with his personal views, yes.

As part of the introduction to Zeitgeist the movie, there was a quote which reveals the way a lot of people view Christianity.

And, honestly, people who view the Bible as «the Good Book» and think it's just about the golden rule or something - well, I'm sure those people tend to be happier than us analytical types - but I think they are taking a lot of verses out of context sometimes too.

@clinton — I was observing the hypocrisy of telling an atheist not to push their views on people when the church (and I'm not calling you out specifically)-- in general, pushes their beliefs on lots of people.

A lot of people seem to be uncomfortable with mystery to the point where they are driven to submit what they consider to be absolute proof to support their point of view.

If I'm just commenting right now I think that most doctrinal error comes from people looking at only the English version of some versus, and that verse in alone excluding context, but making sure that the Greek originals line up with their view based off English helps a lot.

There are lots of «good» things that I fight for in this world, but the two that could be considered driven by my atheistic views are: 1) No childhood brain washing by religious people, which leads to adults who think it's a virtue to ignore facts (ie, faith).

God does not force you to agree to his view, he gave this son because he loved the world, and love is free, he is God he did know that a lot of people would not come, but he have faith in us, it is a choice.

But the problem is some people's view has a lot of make - believe characters that lawyers and politicians from hundreds of years ago sold as something it wasn't.

Contemporary Buddhism, not having any deities, but having lots of common sense and scientifically correct views on life and the universe, and does not judge people, would have been a better fit.

There are a lot of good people / companies of different religions that support their religion but don't try to subjugate others into their point of view.

Postings such as these are the reason why a lot of people who call themselves Christians need to change the way they're viewed.

I would take a different view in that I see one perspective that sees the judgement of people that brings a lot of pain and damage to another group of people, to even tragic ends.

I think a lot of people get hung up on the political views of the members (Abortion... gay marriage... etc) but from what i've seen, they largely are just trying to help people in need from all walks of life.

Any view of religion is going to upset insecre people with different views, and there are a lot of insecure people posting here who do not want thier beliefs challenged / questioned.

Everything in society is now viewed through that very instrumentalized lens and unlike a lot of other people who hold the kind of job that I do, it's totally understandable that that would be the orientation, because higher education has done a spectacularly poor job of delivering on its promises: It has racked up over $ 1.4 trillion in student loan debt, putting an immense burden upon the next generation, not only financially, but dampening their ability to innovate and create.

At the end of the day, what really matters is that a lot of religious people feel the necessity to impose their views on people who believe otherwise.

I think it makes a lot of sense for one to view their faith in terms of people first — God second.

«Obviously he has a different view than a lot of people, especially in England.

well ai nt surprised, i did a video of our Saturday game where Costa was supposed to be red carded after fouling Koscienly and his crimes, people have been viewing it a lot then this morning i got an e-mail that my video has been blocked cus its a copyright that the owners who claimed so is The Premier League.

Those should be dorms, or apartments, or restaurants or something where a lot of people can appreciate the view and proximity to water.

I've realised people are confusing fullback and wingback assuming them to almost be the same.A wingback can be viewed as a more defensive winger whiles a fullback is just a player put near the sides of the centre fullback.Their roles are clearly very different and well defined.That's why you'll consider Ox at RWB and not RB.We need to switch back to 4 -2-3-1 to get the best out of our players like Ozil, Ox, Kolasinac, Bellerin and Monreal.They'll suffer a lot under 3 -4-3.

A lot of people shifted their views from «definitely going to be Reigns» to thinking it was going to be Bryan.

Saying that I do nt think 4231 is the miracle lots of people think it is As I said above it could even be worse from a probability of winning point of view than a 433 and we still score those 3 goals, there is a lot of randomness in football.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

I know a lot of people view Ozil as looking a bit lazy, but surely anyone who can get 50 assists quicker than anyone else ever in the premier League can't be all bad can he?

This was not a particularly competitive fight and probably disappointed a lot of the people who paid $ 100 to see it on pay - per - view.

be it england german or france, cause the citizens of the famous european countries do nt have as much fire or will to fight as the immigrant of war countries / financially «handicapped» sub-countries like sanchez put it rightly, these spoiled kids of the rich countries have bee too long in their comfort zones, while the secondos are had to fight for a lot of things while a lot of the citizens helped them another side of the citizens (people like you) confronted them with racial views and ridicule..

For some bizarre reason a lot of people think they are going to change my view.