Not exact matches
Democrats tackle Willie Soon It was arguably to block climate change regulation that Congress invited Soon — and other
scientists skeptical of the mainstream
view on global warming — to testify.
In this wide - ranging, humorous talk, Seth Shostak takes a look at Star Wars and other science fiction films from the point
of view of a
skeptical scientist, tells stories about the movies he has been asked to advise, and muses about aliens from space and how we might make contact with them.
But the newly obtained documents show that Dr. Carlin's highly
skeptical views on global warming, which have been known for more than a decade within the small unit where he works, have been repeatedly challenged by
scientists inside and outside the E.P.A.; that he holds a doctorate in economics, not in atmospheric science or climatology; that he has never been assigned to work on climate change; and that his comments on the endangerment finding were a product
of rushed and at times shoddy scholarship, as he acknowledged Thursday in an interview.
This means that climate
scientists are going to have to master communicating their broad agreement while maintaining a
skeptical point
of view on detail.
After years
of imposed «scientific consensus» on global warming, a number
of skeptical climate
scientists are hopeful that their
views may finally get a hearing under the new administration.
Although many people have accepted with half - believing and half - doubting the
view that the emission
of greenhouse gases is the primary factors in global climate change, many
scientists are
skeptical about this
view, they have refuted this
view with plenty
of evidence.»
(
Skeptical Science) When these politicians are asked about the basis for their positions on climate change, they almost always respond by saying such things as they «have heard that there is a disagreement among
scientists» or similar responses that strongly suggest they have informed an opinion on climate change science without any understanding
of the depth
of the scientific evidence on which the scientific consensus
view 0f climate change has been based.
Of the dozens of atmospheric scientists in our state at Texas A&M, University of Texas, Rice, Texas Tech, University of Houston, etc., approximately zero of them are skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
Of the dozens
of atmospheric scientists in our state at Texas A&M, University of Texas, Rice, Texas Tech, University of Houston, etc., approximately zero of them are skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
of atmospheric
scientists in our state at Texas A&M, University
of Texas, Rice, Texas Tech, University of Houston, etc., approximately zero of them are skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
of Texas, Rice, Texas Tech, University
of Houston, etc., approximately zero of them are skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
of Houston, etc., approximately zero
of them are skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
of them are
skeptical of this mainstream view of climate scienc
of this mainstream
view of climate scienc
of climate science.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change lead author, Stephen Schneider
of Stanford University, has previously rebuked the arguments
of political
scientist Bjorn Lomborg, contained in his book, The
Skeptical Environmentalist, for «selective inattention to inconvenient literature and overemphasis
of work that supports his lopsided
views».