Lawmakers from Midwestern states also asked about
his views on biofuels, an important market for corn growers.
Not exact matches
ANOTHER
VIEW Bruce Dale, a
biofuels researcher at MichiganState University, says there is a huge amount of uncertainty whenbasing predictions
on an inherently complex economic model.Additionally, he asserts that the United States should not beresponsible for «anything but its own environmental profile» and thatto take into account world land changes is unreasonable.
The aiming of this move is to increase Brazilian capacity in food, raw materials, and
biofuel production, so that, the country, besides being a key player in food supply, may consolidate, from the technological point of
view, the Brazilian role as leader
on bioenergy research.
For a great overview of both sides of the argument (framed around the
biofuels industry), I recommend you look at two Green Inc. posts framing the debate, one today
on the industry point of
view that intensified agriculture can cut land use, and one from last week
on the opposing
view.
Perhaps this
view will become the new received wisdom — it's quoted in today's NYTimes column by economist Paul Krugman, «Grains Gone Wild,» who cites «the rise of demon ethanol and other
biofuels,» and points out, «Oh, and in case you're wondering: all the remaining presidential candidates are terrible
on this issue.»
Notwithstanding critiques of about
biofuels» net - energy value by Pimentel and a handful of other researchers, bioenergy was favorably
viewed in energy circles until recently
on account of its being domestic, abundant and non-fossil.