Sentences with phrase «views on global warming when»
· A majority of all registered voters (55 percent) say they will consider candidates» views on global warming when deciding how to vote.
https://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/ Not exact matches
It would have been great, for example, if Fox had traveled to Woodward, Okla., which one survey found is the most skeptical county in America when it comes to views on global warming, but where the CNN video journalist John Sutter found an oil - company executive pursuing solar - powered independence from the grid.
Again, I'll update this post when Lewis offers an explanation of why his views on global warming research and risk have so starkly changed.
Businesses that share the view Mr. Bush expressed in March, when he rejected any binding limits on the warming gases, whether in a global accord or federal legislation, say they are confident that there will be no big shifts.
When asked their views on when the effects of global warming will begin to happen, 61 % of Americans currently say «they have already begun to happen.&raWhen asked their views on when the effects of global warming will begin to happen, 61 % of Americans currently say «they have already begun to happen.&rawhen the effects of global warming will begin to happen, 61 % of Americans currently say «they have already begun to happen.»
A chemist by training, Robinson started gaining attention for his global warming views when he was asked to write an editorial for The Wall Street Journal on the subject 12 years ago, and he has since made the transition from skeptic to denier of man - made global warming.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
They didn't respond when I pointed out that it was them who were ignoring Popper by basing their views on a single piece of evidence and ignoring all the other indicators of global warming.
Likewise, when I am asked to vote for a politician or a political party's platform in an election, I check out whether they support the consensus view on global warming.
The governor's office has asked Virginia's climatologist to refrain from using his title when conducting non-state business because of fears his views on global warming will be perceived as an official state position.
That sounds especially hard to believe when you try to reconcile that view with this waffling statement made by the company's CEO, Rex Tillerson, on global warming earlier this month:
When asked whether his relationship with Emanuel has changed because of their views on global warming, Lindzen said opaquely in an e-mail, «That is a complicated question.»
He continually confuses global, regional, and local temperature trends, which may differ considerably; he mischaracterizes the results of a poll that was undertaken to determine scientists» views on global warming; and he mistakenly asserts that the sea level has not risen significantly, when it has.
As for sea level rise: we see 30 years of steep global temperature rise during a time when, according to Spencer Weart, whose views on this matter are shared by most if not all climate scientists, «the temperature rise up to 1940 was... mainly caused by some kind of natural cyclical effect, not by the still relatively low CO2 emissions...» (from «The Discovery of Global Warming,» by Spencer Weart — https://history.aip.org/climate/coglobal temperature rise during a time when, according to Spencer Weart, whose views on this matter are shared by most if not all climate scientists, «the temperature rise up to 1940 was... mainly caused by some kind of natural cyclical effect, not by the still relatively low CO2 emissions...» (from «The Discovery of Global Warming,» by Spencer Weart — https://history.aip.org/climate/coGlobal Warming,» by Spencer Weart — https://history.aip.org/climate/co2.htm)