As the Campaign for Socialism (CfS - Momentum's sister organisation north of the border) tweeted: «Our members might have a lot more time for the pro-single market
views presented at #ScotLab18 were they not pushed by the very same people who were demanding Corbyn step down in 2015, 2016, and 2017 at every single turn.»
Not exact matches
Even in work - crazy Japan, the practice of inemuri («sleeping while
present»), often sitting
at one's desk, is
viewed as the ultimate sign of hard work
at the expense of nighttime sleep.
We have
presented three papers that readers can
view at their leisure in order to draw their own conclusions.
Abel is
viewed as the favorite to succeed the CEO
at present.
At the conference,
presented by CNBC and Institutional Investor, Cooperman also shared his
view on the market and oil prices over the next year.
Queen Elizabeth II sat next to Anna Wintour as they
viewed Richard Quinn's runway show before
presenting him with the inaugural Queen Elizabeth II Award for British Design
at London Fashion Week's BFC Show Space on February 20, 2018, in London, United Kingdom.
When he
presented his findings back
at the office, Flom was told to take a hike and actually threatened with termination by the company's CEO: the band was regarded as a joke by Atlantic's executives, their audiences were
viewed as idiots, and their songs were derided as garbage.
We
view the
present environment as an opportunity to add quality equity holdings
at this level or
at cheaper valuations.
In our
view, the most important risk would be that the expansionary forces in the economy would increase to an excessive degree, bringing with it the likelihood that inflation would rise from its
present position
at the top of our target range to something in excess of it.
The tone of the Communique was TEPID
at best and
views the
present state of the global economy as slow but steady.
Litecoin — Litecoin is
viewed as Bitcoin's driving opponent
at present, and it is intended for preparing littler exchanges speedier.
Carney said: «
At present, in my
view, cryptoassets do not appear to pose material risks to financial stability.»
What is most uncomfortable about the
present market environment is that even some people whom we respect are tossing out comments about market valuation here that are provably wrong, or
at least require one to dispense with the entirety of historical evidence if their optimistic
views are to be correct.
Each exploration
presents, fairly and
at length,
views contrary to White's own, before he sets forth his own Thomistic - inspired position.
In my
view, one of the primary properties of evidence is that it can be
presented to others, or
at least verified by others.
Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious
present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of
view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious
presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time,
at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.
We arrive
at a more attractive scientific generalization if we dismiss the apparent dualism between perception of the sheer
present and memory of the past, and adopt instead the
view that only the past literally gets itself experienced in its concrete actuality (MMCL 444)....
That does not mean only (or not primarily) that there is no foreseeable end to the program — a fact which, in
view of what we are
at present presented with, admittedly makes a certain hostility to the media understandable.
In
presenting an argument, I just wish that those who try to tear down the integrity of the Old Testament prophets would
at least be honest, transparent, with the other point of
view.
The author maintains that the real need
at the
present time is for a synthesis between the scientific
view of the world and orthodox, historic Christianity.
At least for me, a Christian point of
view today takes seriously and centrally the fact that continuation of our
present course of action will doom the world that God loves.
«I'm not exactly sure what this text means, but I'm going to take a stab
at it,
present some other
views, and then we'll wrestle with it together.»
4 Affirming this question, the thesis will be
presented that, first, Whitehead knows of, or
at least implicitly enables us to understand, a genuine claim of revelation which can not be justified metaphysically (without being metaphysically irrelevant); and that, secondly, metaphysics becomes relativistic in the
view of a genuine revealed theology.
But such a
view of life, which
at once accepts man's
present limitations and believes in his ultimate potentialities, is only possible to the one who has true religious faith.
Until we can
at least accept that those with differing
views mean to be sincere and we are willing to consider their
views, not dismiss them before they are even
presented, I can't see how we can have a fruitful discussion.
I thought straight away this is a joke as scriptures tell us only the father knows the time of his sons return and hes keeping it to himself he hasnt even told his son yet.Mark 13:32 This a mystery isnt God all knowing and isnt Jesus God it is a mystery.Yet I like that that is the case because it proves that the father is not the son and the son is not the father they are separate yet they are one just like the holy spirit.I have come across denominations that believe the father son and holy spirit are the one person i asked them how they can say that when Jesus was baptized we see 3 separate persons.We have enough information to know that we are in the last days the signs are
present and increasing.Ever since Israel became a nation the countdown has begun.The verse the enemy will come like a thief in the night i have heard preached many times and i believe the preachers have got it wrong because they preach it from the
view for the church to get there act together or you will miss out.This
view is incorrect because if you are a born again believer following him in obedience and relying on the holy spirit you are not walking in darkness but are walking in the light so you will not be caught unaware as those who are sleeping this is a warning for those who are sleeping or walking according to the flesh they are in darkness.Remember the 10 wise virgins the ones who were alert and keep refilling there lamps went in with the bride those who slept were left behind and so it will be when the Lord returns.Now is the time to prepare our hearts and lives to be ready for his return.It is an exciting time to be living and we are to live in the expectation that the Lord could return
at any time brentnz
Yet in
view of its amazing growth in its first 150 years, it is not without interest to note that an LDS mathematician recently made a half - joking but statistically correct projection that «if Mormonism continues to grow in the United States
at its
present rate, and if the U.S. population continues to grow
at its
present rate, then in another 150 years when Mormonism celebrates its tricentennial, all the nation's citizens will be Mormons.»
I will
present the orthodox Christian / Lutheran
view of this passage below, but first I would like us to look
at something else in this passage that is odd:
This
view,
at any rate, is the only one compatible with saying, as Whitehead does say, that an entity which is actual, is actual regardless of whether its
present existence is that of a subject enjoying the universe from which it arises or that of a superject functioning objectively in subsequent processes.
In the face of both thinkers» categorical denial that there is any such thing as a substantial self which endures throughout the constant process of transition, our task
at hand will be to
present their developmental insights in a language and style which truly captures the dynamic thrust of their
views.
To those who still say that such a critique is invalid, I would reply that their
view is
at best totally un-Heideggerian and,
at worst, contrary to the results of the careful analysis of someone like Karsten Harries, whose
views I have tried to
present.
, That Rylaarsdam's criticism is in part,
at least, based on a misunderstanding of Buber's position and a difference in Rylaarsdam's own a priori assumptions is shown by his further statements that «Because of his individual and personal emphasis the notion of an objective revelation of God in nature and history involving the whole community of Israel in the real event of the Exodus does not fit well for him,» that Buber's
view of revelation is «essentially mystical and nonhistorical,» and that «the realistic disclosure of Yahweh as the Lord of nature and of history recedes into the background because of an overconcern with the experience of personal relation» — criticisms which are all far wide of the mark, as is shown by the
present chapter.)
Yet to a biologist, preformation is a perfectly respectable biological and evolutionary
view, even though it is
at present a minority
view among embryologists and evolutionists.
If you postulate that life and mind were brand new principles which began to appear
at some time and were not
at all
present earlier, you have an epigenetic evolutionary
view; if, by contrast, you find the rudiments
present in all nature universally, this is a preformistic
view.
If you look
at the different types of government ideologies throughout the world, past and
present, There is,» Communist, Fascist, Theocratic, Democratic, Republican, ect...» Notice how atheism doesn't fit because atheism is not, like you stated is it, a world
view, but rather a rejection of religious world
views.
Any casual glance back
at hisory, right up to the
present day will confirm that point of
view for any who have intellectual honesty.
At the risk of even greater brevity but in the hope of a clear capsule
view, I set forth my own model: fundamental theology is that discipline which consists in philosophical reflection upon the meanings
present in our common human experience and in the Christian fact.
In the past and
at present, this principle has been invoked, on both the right and the left, by those who are frequently
viewed as extremists.
When the father of the family recounts the story of that deliverance, it is no mere mental recollection which is in
view; rather, it is the making into a contemporary event, in which those
present are able to share, of that which (in Jewish belief) God accomplished
at the Red Sea many centuries ago.
But Professor Ogden's criticisms of Bultmann rest upon so substantial an agreement with the alternative he
presents that one must
view this final maneuver
at the goal line, not as that of negating Bultmann, but of carrying his theological method to a surer victory in establishing a basis for a postliberal theology.
The second part of the motion requested «the House of Bishops to investigate a means to develop sensitive, local pastoral arrangements for public prayer and thanksgiving with same - sex couples
at these key moments in their lives, and to
present their ideas to General Synod 2018, with a
view to making proposals
at General Synod 2019.»
It's not a popular
view at present, but some question the current passion for politics and politically rooted social justice within the Church.
For a summary of some of the scientific research which supports the
view that the fetus is not a prepackaged human being (e.g., even something so relatively simple as a fingerprint arises
at least in part due to chance events not
present in a fertilized egg) see Charles Gardner, «Is an Embryo a Person?
However, while this basic interrelationality is the foundation for a process
view of original sin, it requires expansion into the peculiarity not simply of subjectivity, but of intersubjectivity
at the level of social institutions that organize the shaping influence of the past upon the
present.
The
present position of the Church's official teaching can also perhaps be made clearer by reference to the
views of theologians
at the
present day.
Here we see unknown writers in the hills of ancient Judah, seated in simple homes that from the point of
view of our
present - day luxury might be regarded as little better than hovels, surrounded with furnishings more bare and austere than those of a medieval monastery, equipped with simple reed pens and rolls of papyrus, or perhaps with broken sherds of old pots, as they slowly indite in awkward, ancient Hebrew characters, words that have run like fire and are potent
at this distant day.
It is our
present view that marital growth groups of
at least eight sessions tend to be more productive.
Larry, I do not mind
at all when people disagree with the
views presented on this blog.
We have to understand that in every stage of our historical development we have a corresponding world
view, and that is changing and that the
present religions are already obsolete and anachronistic.its now the job and responsibilty of all educators, You are
at the forefront of change
That's something I've noticed that Jeremy is very good
at,
presenting His
view / thoughts without being overbearing and being gracious to others that might see things differently.