Not exact matches
If it does refer to a particular sexual practices, there are a number of (and perhaps much more credible alternatives) than to
viewing it as all anal sex between men (i.e. «
sodomy»).
Regardless of your biblical
views,
sodomy is an unsanitary, and in my opinion, a deviant practice.
Thus, the Court claims, there is precedent for the
view that the procreative potential once thought essential to marriage is in fact no more central to the institution than the race, precedents embodied in the Court's previous affirmation of liberty rights to contraception and
sodomy in Griswold and Lawrence.
The problem with this
view (on
sodomy) is that it doesn't apply to female partners.
Instead of putting some anti-Christian garbage on the front page which promotes a liberal agenda why not show how «fair» you are when it come to the news and carry a Christian
view on say
sodomy which is what we're talking about?
My ex-wife
viewed any flavor of that intimacy other than that vanilla stuff named for missionaries as
sodomy.