Though Taubman pleaded not guilty, he was convicted for conspiracy to
violate antitrust laws in his capacity as owner of the Sotheby's auction house on Dec. 5.
Not exact matches
«If Mylan engaged
in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable.»
«
In concluding that Aetna's acquisition of Humana would
violate federal
antitrust laws, the court has protected consumers and the competition on which they rely.
However,
in October 2016 the UK Competition and Markets Authority said the acquisition
violated antitrust laws, and that was reaffirmed by a UK appeals court
in March 2017.
But with Google's strong lead
in the search industry, analysts said it is highly unlikely Microsoft's proposed deal would
violate antitrust laws.
While MLS commissioner Doug Logan denied Clemetson's allegations, the league's handling of Caligiuri underlined flaws
in the system, which
in February prompted 10 players to file a class - action suit against MLS, claiming that the league's restraints on players
violated antitrust laws.
No activity or discussion at any Association meeting or other function may be engaged
in for the purpose of bringing about any understanding or agreement among members that may
violate or appear to
violate the
antitrust laws, including but not limited to raise, lower or stabilize prices; to regulate production; to allocate markets; to encourage boycotts; to foster unfair trade practices; to assist monopolization; or to
in any way
violate federal or state
antitrust laws.
A judge convicted Gilman and McNenney
in 2008 of
violating state
antitrust laws.
«If Mylan engaged
in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable.
«If Mylan engaged
in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable,» Schneiderman said.
In the plea deal with the U.S. Department of Justice, NEC Business Network Solutions Inc. — an Irving, Texas - based subsidiary of NEC America Inc. — also accepted responsibility for
violating federal
antitrust laws by allocating contracts to avert competition and rigging...
Although Apple and the publishers may have cooperated
in ways that
violated the nation's sometimes contradictory
antitrust laws, for the Justice Department to single this matter out and not address other issues
in the book industry or
in business
in general seems misguided.
Apple
violated federal
antitrust law in a conspiracy with five book publishers to fix ebook prices,...
Hachette Livre said it «remains confident that it did not
violate the
antitrust laws, and has made no admission of liability,» but added that the «costs, length, and distractions of the proceedings before the European Commission would be too disruptive to its business and to the development of ebook markets
in general».
But
in doing so, the U.S. Justice Department contends, Apple
violated antitrust laws by colluding with the five largest book publishers — HarperCollins, the Penguin Group, the Hatchett Group, MacMillan, and Simon & Schuster — to fix the prices of electronic books.
In a surprise ruling, a New York district judge found Apple guilty of conspiring to raise the retail prices of e-books with publishers and
violating antitrust and state
laws.
After being found guilty of
violating antitrust laws by a US District Judge
in 2013 and by an Appeals court
in 2015, Apple's request for an appeal to the US Supreme Court was denied this past March, forcing it to settle with the plaintiffs.
I can't find it right now — my laptop with most of my research on it died before I could back the research up — but there are several posts by authors and publishing insiders who admit that Apple and the Publishing 5 may have colluded
in such a way as to
violate the
antitrust laws.
They operate
in lockstep
in a way that seems to
violate both good business sense and
antitrust laws.
States to join feds
in determining if Comcast's plan to buy Time Warner Cable
violates antitrust law, Reuters
That question is this: to what extent does the role the ABA and state and local bar associations play
in excluding nonlawyers, be they individuals or nonlawyer - owned organizations, from the legal services market
violate unfair competition and
antitrust laws and policies?
In June 2015, Weil persuaded a Tennessee federal court to dismiss with prejudice a putative nationwide class action (Marshall) brought by NCAA Division I student - athletes alleging that CBS, other networks, college athletic conferences, and licensors, profited from the broadcast and use of student - athletes» names, images, and likenesses without permission,
violating Tennessee's right of publicity statute and federal
antitrust laws.
Back
in 2012 a group of iPhone owners accused Apple of
violating U.S.
antitrust law by requiring apps to be sold exclusively at its own App Store, instead of allowing third party sources too.
Brokers also need policies that prohibit salespeople who blog from making potentially libelous statements about other industry professionals or talking about commissions or business operations
in ways that could
violate antitrust or fair housing
laws.
Regional MLS Sandicor and its member associations didn't
violate federal
antitrust laws when 11 MLSs
in San Diego County agreed
in the early 1990s to consolidate their listing services into one company.
Military Services Realty, Tidewater, Va., claims Realty Consultants
violated state and federal
antitrust laws, misappropriated trade secrets, and engaged
in unfair competition.
The Daily Progress newspaper
in Charlottesville alleged that the REALTORS ® had
violated federal and state
antitrust laws by engaging
in a group boycott of the newspaper.
In Thompson v. DeKalb Board of REALTORS ®, the 11th Circuit addressed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Board and MLS, dismissing plaintiffs» claim that the Federal antitrust laws are violated by the requirement that brokers be REALTORS ® to gain access to the Board's ML
In Thompson v. DeKalb Board of REALTORS ®, the 11th Circuit addressed the district court's grant of summary judgment
in favor of the defendant Board and MLS, dismissing plaintiffs» claim that the Federal antitrust laws are violated by the requirement that brokers be REALTORS ® to gain access to the Board's ML
in favor of the defendant Board and MLS, dismissing plaintiffs» claim that the Federal
antitrust laws are
violated by the requirement that brokers be REALTORS ® to gain access to the Board's MLS.
In an important ruling for REALTOR ® Associations, a California federal district court has ruled that a multiple listing service («MLS») and its member associations did not
violate federal
antitrust laws.
In its amended complaint, the DOJ says provisions in the new ILD policy that give brokers the ability to unilaterally withhold their listings from display on competitors» websites — known as a blanket opt - out — violates antitrust law
In its amended complaint, the DOJ says provisions
in the new ILD policy that give brokers the ability to unilaterally withhold their listings from display on competitors» websites — known as a blanket opt - out — violates antitrust law
in the new ILD policy that give brokers the ability to unilaterally withhold their listings from display on competitors» websites — known as a blanket opt - out —
violates antitrust laws.
Despite the fact that staff are well versed
in antitrust matters, the presence of staff at a meeting should not invite discussion of matters that
violate the letter or spirit of this policy or the
antitrust laws.
A real estate broker's ability to keep his firm from
violating the
antitrust laws is
in direct proportion to his ability and willingness to educate his salespeople.
In addition, however, real estate professionals should recognize that the outcome of courtroom trials in general, and antitrust trials in particular, does not necessarily depend upon the actual facts regarding the conduct alleged to violate the la
In addition, however, real estate professionals should recognize that the outcome of courtroom trials
in general, and antitrust trials in particular, does not necessarily depend upon the actual facts regarding the conduct alleged to violate the la
in general, and
antitrust trials
in particular, does not necessarily depend upon the actual facts regarding the conduct alleged to violate the la
in particular, does not necessarily depend upon the actual facts regarding the conduct alleged to
violate the
law.