Not exact matches
Aphria stood as one of the few major marijuana growers in Canada that
established significant operations in the U.S.. However, the company has taken steps to reduce its U.S. exposure after the Toronto Stock Exchange threatened to delist the stocks of members with ongoing business activities that
violate U.S. federal marijuana
laws.
I lean towards the third view... but I admit it is the most difficult of the three views... Christ's priorities appear to be «love in motion» flowing in almost unpredictable directions as dictated by the greatest need: — He heals a slave rather than rebukes slavery; — He heals a man at a pool, then leads the man to belief, then says «cease from sinning»; — He heals many others and says «go and sin no more» to but a few; — He shares money with the poor but
establishes no long - term aid; — He touches lepers; He converses with seeking Pharisees; He debates with other Pharisees; He lives with Samaritan outcasts for two days; — He acknowledges the five «marriages» of the Samaritan woman as «marriages»... and then remarks about her current co-habitation... but then moves to higher priorities; — He seems so very focused on internal holiness and not on external holiness; — He
violates the Sabbath; He says He is Lord of the Sabbath; He even says that the Sabbath was created to assist man, rather than man created to serve the Sabbath... thus turning the entire concept of the
Law into one of assistance rather than being chained to obedience; — He insists on impartiality in the way we bless others, even if we call them «evil» or «good».
The Public Integrity Commission has refused to heed a call to investigate whether four members of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's Medicaid Redesign Team
violated the Public Officers
Law, saying a complaint filed by the Center for Justice and Democracy «failed to
establish a basis» for the probe.
Risa Sugarman, the board's enforcement officer, charged in a suit earlier this month that the Independent Democratic Conference
violated the
law by teaming up with the Independence Party to
establish the Senate Independence Campaign Committee and a related housekeeping account.
The legislation authorizes the Department of State to shut down businesses that
violate the
law and
establishes new opportunities for individuals to work while studying for their licensing exam.
The suit alleges that Onondaga County
violated Not - for - Profit Corporations
Law through the sale of necessary property and that the county legislature exceeded their authority by abolishing Van Duyn's work force in the county budget, which essentially eliminates the county department of Long Term Care Services,
established under county charter.
The legislation would also
establish harsher penalties for service providers that
violate the
law.
The supreme court, in a 6 - to - 3 decision, upheld a county district judge's finding in March 1983 that a group of parents
violated the state's compulsory - attendance
law by sending their children to a school
established by the Calvary Baptist Church in Charles City.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed last week to reconsider one of its important precedents on qualified immunity, which protects public officials such as educators and police officers from liability when their challenged actions did not
violate clearly
established law.
Prohibits persons
violating animal cruelty
law from owning, keeping, or harboring animals; requires DHSS
establish and maintain website list of such persons.
The FWCC should inform local governments that by permitting cat colonies to be
established and TNR to be performed in their jurisdictions, they are
violating state wildlife
laws.
* On February 17, 2000, the Wisconsin Attorney General concluded that there was sufficient evidence to
establish that the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin («PSCW») had
violated Wisconsinís Open Meetings
Laws in connection with its refusal to permit citizens to attend a January 24, 2000 meeting sponsored by the PSCW with FPL Energyís attorneys and others that was directed at attempting to develop wind energy siting guidelines.
The Special Prosecutor concluded that there was sufficient evidence to
establish that Wisconsinís Ethics
laws had been
violated, however, he declined to prosecute.
A violation of a state
law «reasonableness» requirement would not, however, necessarily
establish that the award is so «grossly excessive» as to
violate the Federal Constitution.»
As reported by the New York
Law Journal, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated that it was particularly disturbing to him that «a law firm and a partner in the firm would so flagrantly violate such a clear and well - established law, as was alleged in this case.&raq
Law Journal, U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara stated that it was particularly disturbing to him that «a
law firm and a partner in the firm would so flagrantly violate such a clear and well - established law, as was alleged in this case.&raq
law firm and a partner in the firm would so flagrantly
violate such a clear and well -
established law, as was alleged in this case.&raq
law, as was alleged in this case.»
The burden is legally on the business to
establish whether a substance is contained in a product — the state does not inform businesses «Your product has X, you must label it» (they, or a plaintiff's attorney, will inform you that you have
violated the
law).
An Arizona police officer who shot and wounded a woman holding a large knife didn't
violate clearly
established law, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a summary reversal.
If you can show that a driver
violated a traffic
law at the time of the accident, this can be used as evidence to assist in
establishing the defendant's negligence.
This exception, according to case
law that has been
established for about a century, [5] includes the case in which fundamental requirements of due process have been
violated in the foreign proceedings.
This
violates the test laid out by the Supreme Court in the Firearms Reference: «if the effects of the
law, considered with its purpose, go so far as to
establish that it is mainly a
law in relation to property and civil rights, then the
law is ultra vires the federal government».
Here, where the motorist
violated a Maine safety
law, negligence can often be
established.
I think it is illustrative of the sorry state of Canada's privacy
laws that we can not say with any certainty that this in fact
violates any
established privacy rights, particularly in the workplace context.
The other party's conduct is automatically considered to be negligent once it is
established that he or she
violated the
law.
Other government officials generally have only «qualified immunity» which means that they have liability if they intentionally
violate clearly
established law, which basically means that there is a binding judicial precedent governing the facts and circumstances at issue.
They
violate their «long
established legal tenet» by asking for the
law to assume the parent is making a bad decision simply because the other parent disagrees with it.
Next, the Nonprofit argued that even if the tenants had standing to bring a lawsuit, the Form did not
violate state
law and also that the tenants can not
establish an injury under the state's consumer protection
law.
Bronson v. Algonquin Lodge Assn., Inc. (295 A.D. 2d 681)-- broker entitled to commission where broker
establishes that owner agreed to sell its property at the full appraised value and that broker produced a ready, willing and able purchaser at the price set forth in a formal written appraisal of the property; owner, a not - for - profit corporation, fails to
establish that the listing agreement
violated either its constitution or Not - For - Profit Corporation
Law § § 509 and 510 which govern the sale of real property, not the execution of the listing agreement
79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of
law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker
violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of
law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to
establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained
In 2014, U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest granted summary judgment to prosecutors» forfeiture request, agreeing that the government had
established that the building's primary owners — the Alavi Foundation and a shell company controlled by the government of Iran — had been
violating Iran sanctions
laws since 1995.
1) TREB - I believe the members in question are using TREB to break the
law this
violates TREB bylaws 2) RECO - I think you will find the Ontario Brokerage in question is breaking Quebec
law which means they are in breach of RECO here in Ontairo 3) CREA - CREA has already
established it's agreement with Provincial legislation in the Province of Manitoba over the DDF.
189 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Naftal - listing agreements; deposits; unauthorized practice of
law; vicarious liability; amendment of pleading to conform to the proof; improperly altering listing agreement without the consent or knowledge of principal to show the potential commission split with buyer's broker to meet MLS requirements; preparing and submitting fraudulent MLS change notifications purporting to extend and alter listings; deposit of escrow funds into operating account; preparation of lease constitutes the unauthorized practice of
law; pleadings may be amended to conform to the proof and encompass a charge not stated in the complaint where the issue has been fully litigated by the parties and is closely enough related to the stated charges that there is no surprise or prejudice to the respondent; continuing to offer properties for sale after preparation of forged listing extensions
violates 19 NYCRR 175.10; DOS fails to
establish violation of 19 NYCRR 175.12 for failure to provide copy of listing extension where extension was not authorized by principal; DOS fails to demonstrate demand for unearned commission where broker may have believed they were entitled to a commission; broker's licenses suspended for one year and thereafter until such time as restitution in the amounts of $ 5,000.00 and $ 2,055.40 is made