This blockquote probably
violates fair use or something... but this is the core of the post -LSB-...]
violates the fair use doctrine, sewhitebooks will comply and remove it immediately.
Not exact matches
When someone finds a new way to
violate a copyright it is almost impossible to know whether this falls under the
fair use exception until it goes to court.
«Landmark Copyright Decision Defends
Fair Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal under the academic provisions of fair use and did not violate copyri
Fair Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal under the academic provisions of fair use and did not violate copyrig
Use» (Nate Hoffelder, The Digital Reader blog) A judge has found that Georgia State University librarians» photocopying of materials was indeed legal under the academic provisions of
fair use and did not violate copyri
fair use and did not violate copyrig
use and did not
violate copyright.
Defendants Richard Prince, Gagosian Gallery, Inc., and Lawrence Gagosian seek a determination that their
use of Plaintiff's copyrighted photographs was a
fair use under the relevant section of the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § § 107 (1)- (4), and that Plaintiff's claim for conspiracy to
violate his rights under the Copyright Act is barred by law.
This could
violate any range of federal copyright law pursuant to 17 US code § Ch 1 - 8 and 10 - 12 as it would almost certainly fail to qualify as «
fair use».
As most readers will know, with works of «criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research,» to
use the example of the U.S. legal system, authors can in the name of
fair use reasonably cite others» published work without
violating copyright.
Short answer: This would almost surely
violate copyright law, as this would be a derivative work and is probably not
fair use.
The court ruled that the stamp was not
fair use and the Postal Service had
violated the sculptor's copyright.
Ten years later, a federal appeals court — the Second Circuit court of appeals — just recently ruled that the project does not
violate copyright laws and is considered
fair use under copyright law and does not infringe on the rights of its authors.
Running a quick background check on the blind date you've been set up with might be a good way (or not, remember it's going to be a database search) to
use the latest mobile background screening apps, but the FTC fears employers might be
using these apps for employment screening purposes — and that could very easily
violate the
Fair Credit Reporting Act.
In August, HireRight Solutions of Tulsa, Oklahoma, agreed to pay $ 2.6 million to settle Federal Trade Commission allegations that it
violated the
Fair Credit Reporting Act, or FCRA, by failing to
use reasonable procedures to ensure the accuracy of the information it was selling.
An employment background screening company that provides consumer reports to companies nationwide will pay $ 2.6 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that it
violated the
Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to
use reasonable procedures to assure the maximum possible accuracy of information it provided, failing to give consumers copies of their reports, and failing to reinvestigate consumer disputes, as required by law.
Facebook ad targeting can be helpful if you
use it in a smart way, but agents should tread carefully when
using demographic targeting to avoid
violating Fair Housing laws.