Sentences with phrase «violate order of protection»

Last Month Klimaszewski was charged with a felony count of contempt for violating an order of protection in Groton.
District Attorney Thomas P. Zugibe stated that on or about November 16, 2011, September 5, 2011, and September 4, 2011, defendant violated orders of protection in favor of his mother and father, and thereby caused physical injury to his mother, and damaged property belonging to his parents.
Cops say the defendant violated Orders of Protection twice on April 14 ordering him to stay away from two residences in Tomkins Cove.
James Rogowski, a Cheektowaga town councilman, faced the media last night outside Council Chambers in Cheektowaga Town Hall following his arrest last week for felony contempt for violating an order of protection.
While The Putnam Times, a local paper incorrectly reported that Ball violated the order of protection by following the woman to Israel on July 20, News Channel 12, a regional network, pointed out that order of protection was filed six days earlier on July 14, and court records state Ball traveled to Israel on June 20.
A drone protester was taken into custody in the town of DeWitt to begin serving a six - month jail sentence for violating an order of protection for a colonel at Hancock Air National Guard Base.
Thompson was arrested in 2013, after violating an order of protection, & after missing court dates; the Town of Barker Court issued a bench warrant for his arrest.
Rogowski, a Cheektowaga town councilman, was arrested Friday by West Seneca Police and charged with felony contempt for violating an order of protection, according to West Seneca Police.
The request comes in the wake of the accusation that Rogowski violated an order of protection obtained by his wife when he was arrested February 23 by West Seneca police on a felony contempt charge.
Violating this order of protection can trigger additional criminal charges and penalties.
If you have violated an order of protection, you need to seek out legal help as soon as possible.
If you have violated an order of protection in Queens and need help, hire a experienced lawyer to handle your case.
The police will probably arrest the individual for violating the order of protection.
The younger brother of the founder of the punk band Black Flag was busted Wednesday — for a second time — for violating an order of protection against his wife,...

Not exact matches

Chuang ruled that the agencies were likely to succeed in proving that the travel ban portion of the executive order was intended to be a ban on Muslims and, as a result, violates the U.S. Constitution's religious freedom protection.
In the ruling, Judge Andrew Goodman wrote that the agency violated the family's religious protections and ordered them to remove the fostering ban from their file: «Their constitutional rights of freedom of religion and freedom of expression have been infringed and must be remedied in a manner that is appropriate and just in the circumstances.
he is not in Ireland and is not a US citizen so that will definitely work against him.plus he sent 5 people to the hospital and could face at least 5 multi-million dollar lawsuits and 5 order of protections meaning he can in no way try to contact the 5 named or else violate his bond... his career is over and they will have his jail cell waiting for him...
the felonies alone can be up to 11 years... he will face up to 5 multi-million dollar lawsuits for the 5 that had to go to the hospital.he also has 5 orders of protection meaning he can in no way reach out to the 5 named or he violates his bond.when convicted he will be deported from the states and have visa problems in most countries as he will have a criminal record... now the incident at Bellator will come back to haunt his as it shows his thug mentality which may be ok in Ireland but not the rest of the world.
In its complaint, the state of Hawaii also said the executive order discriminates against Muslims and violates the equal protection and due process guarantees of the U.S. Constitution.
«You have an order, the order, first of all, has to be legal... it can't on its face violate due process, equal protection.
There isn't one specific provision in the California constitution that's violated, exactly: Rather, the court identifies three «pertinent» clauses in the constitution: a guarantee of equal protection under the law, a provision ordering the legislature to encourage «intellectual [and] scientific improvement,» and a requirement that the legislature «provide for a system of common schools.»
Persons who have violated a Protection Order shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than one year or a fine of not more than one 1,000,000 yen.
In addition, a person who violates a protection order may also be held in contempt of court and punished by a fine of up to $ 500 and imprisonment up to twenty - five days.
I think this case presents only a single federal question: did the order of the Maryland Court of Appeals granting a new trial, limited to the issue of punishment, violate petitioner's Fourteenth Amendment right to equal protection?
We then argued that, in light of that fact, the district attorney could not prove our client «knowingly» violated a protection order, as required by the statute.
The best way for a parent to get maximum power, protections, and right is to get: 1) sole legal custody (so that the parent can make all major decisions without his input and without court approval); 2) the most days and overnights of parenting time as the court will allow; and 3) very specific language throughout the final custody / divorce order that spells out exactly which activities and behaviors that the parents must either perform or are prohibited from doing (so that if the other parent violates, then it will be easier to prove the violation to the court and therefore get some sort of remedy, such as finding the other parent in contempt of court).
For more information about the penalties for violating a protection order, click to visit Overview of Protectiprotection order, click to visit Overview of ProtectionProtection Orders.
This law does not require a showing of specific intent to cause another person to cross state or reservation lines, but does require proof that the travel resulted from force, coercion, duress or fraud, and proof that the person violated the relevant portion of the protection order during the course of, as a result of, or to facilitate the forced or coerced conduct or travel.
It is also a crime to cause a person to cross state lines, or enter or leave Indian country, by force, coercion, duress or fraud, and during, as a result of, or to facilitate such conduct or travel, engage in conduct that violates the portion of an order of protection.
The Act restricts a protected Charter right to freedom of expression, but gives insufficient guidance to issue protection orders and so violates the Charter right to freedom of expression:
In Crouch, the court was asked to consider (1) whether to re-confirm the Protection Order under the Act, and (2) whether the Act violates the Charter by infringing on an individual's freedom of expression or by violating an individual's right to life, liberty and security of the person.
The Federal Court of Canada released a landmark decision finding that the court has the jurisdiction to make an extra-territorial order with world - wide effects against a foreign resident requiring the foreign person to remove documents containing personal information about a Canadian citizen that violates the person's rights under Canada's privacy law, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).
What should you do if he violates the term of the protection order?
If the problem is one of physical violence, a protection from abuse order from the court would be better than a separation agreement, and could be used to punish the wrongdoer if he or she violated the order.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a consent order against a title company for violating the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) for receiving money in exchange for referrals and for failure to notify consumers of an affiliated business relationship with a title insurance underwriter.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z