«If Mylan engaged in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable,» Schneiderman said.
«If Mylan engaged in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable.
«If Mylan engaged in anti-competitive business practices, or
violated antitrust laws with the intent and effect of limiting lower cost competition, we will hold them accountable.»
Not exact matches
The deal allows Apple to continue to appeal Cote's July 2013 ruling that Apple had
violated antitrust laws by colluding
with the publishers to drive up e-book prices and impede rivals such as Amazon.com Inc..
Specifically, Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company conspired
with other dental supply companies to
violate federal
antitrust laws; (ii) discovery of the foregoing conduct would subject the Company to heightened regulatory scrutiny and potential criminal sanctions; and (iii) that as a result of the foregoing, Henry Schein's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
But
with Google's strong lead in the search industry, analysts said it is highly unlikely Microsoft's proposed deal would
violate antitrust laws.
In the plea deal
with the U.S. Department of Justice, NEC Business Network Solutions Inc. — an Irving, Texas - based subsidiary of NEC America Inc. — also accepted responsibility for
violating federal
antitrust laws by allocating contracts to avert competition and rigging...
On Wednesday, July 10, a federal judge ruled that Apple
violated antitrust laws by conspiring
with five publishers to raise and fix e-book prices.
Apple
violated federal
antitrust law in a conspiracy
with five book publishers to fix ebook prices,...
The complaint alleges that Apple
violated antitrust laws by colluding
with publishers to keep e-book prices high.
But in doing so, the U.S. Justice Department contends, Apple
violated antitrust laws by colluding
with the five largest book publishers — HarperCollins, the Penguin Group, the Hatchett Group, MacMillan, and Simon & Schuster — to fix the prices of electronic books.
The complaint alleges that Apple
violated antitrust laws by colluding
with...
The US Department of Justice has urged an appeals court to uphold the verdict against Apple that found the fruity firm had
violated antitrust laws and conspired
with book publishers to fix the price of ebooks.
In a surprise ruling, a New York district judge found Apple guilty of conspiring to raise the retail prices of e-books
with publishers and
violating antitrust and state
laws.
After being found guilty of
violating antitrust laws by a US District Judge in 2013 and by an Appeals court in 2015, Apple's request for an appeal to the US Supreme Court was denied this past March, forcing it to settle
with the plaintiffs.
I can't find it right now — my laptop
with most of my research on it died before I could back the research up — but there are several posts by authors and publishing insiders who admit that Apple and the Publishing 5 may have colluded in such a way as to
violate the
antitrust laws.
We think it beyond question that a union may conclude a wage agreement
with the multiemployer bargaining unit without
violating the
antitrust laws, and that it may, as a matter of its own policy, and not by agreement
with all or part of the employers of that unit, seek the same wages from other employers.
In June 2015, Weil persuaded a Tennessee federal court to dismiss
with prejudice a putative nationwide class action (Marshall) brought by NCAA Division I student - athletes alleging that CBS, other networks, college athletic conferences, and licensors, profited from the broadcast and use of student - athletes» names, images, and likenesses without permission,
violating Tennessee's right of publicity statute and federal
antitrust laws.