Authorities are also examining whether fundraising efforts for Democratic state senate candidates
violated campaign contribution limit laws by being routed to other committees, which were allowed to rake in huge donations compared to caps on single donors directly to a candidate's campaign.
Not exact matches
The National Organiztion for Marriage has filed a lawsuit in federal court that seeks to circumvent the state's
campaign contributions limits, arguing that the caps
violate its right to free speech.
The Republican candidate for the vacant seat of the New York State Assembly's 145th District, Mickey Kearns, is facing a formal complaint that he
violated state
campaign laws by accepting individual and corporate
contributions for the upcoming special election over the legal
limit.
In a filing obtained by The Post, GOP chair Ed Cox charged that NYSUT, the state's largest teachers» union, and its
campaign arms have exceeded
contribution limits to state Senate Democrats and also share staff, which
violates the law.
As the two investigations diverged, the U.S. attorney's office focused almost exclusively on potential quid pro quo arrangements with de Blasio donors from the 2013
campaign, while Vance's office remained focused on complaints referred by the state Board of Elections over whether the mayor
violated contribution limits in steering money to Democratic State Senate candidates in 2014.
The U.S. Attorney and Manhattan DA are investigating whether the office of New York City Mayor Bill deBlasio knowingly
violated campaign contribution laws by funneling donations for some upstate Senate races through county committees, which can accept donations 10 times higher than the
limits on an individual Senate candidate.
On Thursday, the prosecutor said the de Blasio operation «enabled an unprecedented amount of money to flow» to individual
campaigns, but did so without
violating the
limits on
contributions.
He argued the LLC may have been used to «willfully evade
campaign contribution limits» by using a «false name,» which would
violate election law.
The Florida Supreme Court thus publicly reprimanded Williams - Yulee for
violating the Canon, notwithstanding her complaint that the Canon
violates the First Amendment «in that it
limits a judicial candidate's right to engage in free speech by prohibiting a judicial candidate from directly soliciting
campaign contributions.»
The Supreme Court of the United States recently considered whether Missouri's
limits on
campaign contributions violated the First and Fourteenth Amendment free speech guarantees found in the Constitution of the United States.