«Even the cardinal rule that a great essay must be beautifully written has been
violated in a few instances,» says Martin Gardner, introducing Great Essays in Science (Prometheus Books, pp 427, # 14.50), a splendid collection of 34 essays on science and some of the big issues of science and philosophy.
Not exact matches
Aside from being asinine business, that would
violate Title II Section 222 of the Communications Act, which says common carriers can not permit access to «individually identifiable» customer data except
in a
few specific
instances, like when required by law.
For
instance, many do not require that coaches receive training
in recognizing the signs and symptoms of concussion, or require that parents be notified when their child is suspected of having suffered a concussion, and
few penalize those who
violate their provisions.
Now, it is apparent from reading even the first
few pages of The Skeptical Environmentalist that Lomborg proposes to make the case that not just environmentalists, but a considerable part of the heretofore respectable environmental - science community, have been misunderstanding the relevant concepts, misrepresenting the relevant facts, understating the uncertainties, selecting data, and failing to acknowledge errors after these have been pointed out
in other words, that the scientist contributors to what he calls «the environmental litany» (namely, that environmental problems are serious and becoming,
in many
instances more so) have been guilty of massively
violating the scientists code of conduct.