Sentences with phrase «violated judicial rules»

«Utah's top federal jurist violated judicial rules with Obama donations»: This article appears today in The Salt Lake Tribune.

Not exact matches

Fisher, who got unanimous backing from her district's GOP convention, ran into a late season snafu in the past month when another State Supreme Court Justice ruled that votes taken in the Conservative Party's judicial nominating convention in September violated election law.

In 2010 in an appeal from a hearing officer's decision, the Circuit Court for the 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami - Dade County, ruled that the subjective identification of a dog as a «pit bull» by an animal control officer violated the dog's owner's right to due process.

Justices Roggensack, Prosser and Ziegeler, on the other hand, accepted the Panel's recommendations and ruled that imposing a violation under the Judicial Code would violate the First Amendment.

In an Op - Ed titled Not in Canadian court: Trump «values» — nor a Trump hat published in The Globe and Mail edition of November 14, 2016, Professor Tanovich condemned Judge Zabel's behaviour this way: «It violated one of the most basic rules of judicial ethics — the prohibition on partisan political activity.

Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that the «announce» clause, a provision of Minnesota's Code of Judicial Conduct that prohibits a candidate for judicial office from discussing his or her views on a political issue violates the First AmJudicial Conduct that prohibits a candidate for judicial office from discussing his or her views on a political issue violates the First Amjudicial office from discussing his or her views on a political issue violates the First Amendment.

The complaint in the civil suit against Maggio claimed that Maggio had abused the public trust, which is a class D felony in Arkansas, and that this abuse made him liable to Ms. Bull's estate under the statute that allows victims of a felony to bring a civil action; that Maggio breached a fiduciary duty to the plaintiffs by engaging in conduct that violated certain judicial and statutory rules; that Maggio engaged in a civil conspiracy with Gilbert Baker and Michael Morton; and that Maggio acted in concert with Morton and Baker.

Williams - Yulee's case is now before the U.S. Supreme Court, and the question it will decide is whether a rule of judicial conduct that prohibits candidates for judicial office from personally soliciting campaign funds violates the First Amendment.

But if he's concerned about the small investor, he should (hopefully) be happy about the decision issued yesterday by the Board of Governors of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) «finding Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. violated FINRA rules when the firm attempted to keep investors from participating in judicial class actions by adding waiver language to customer account agreements.»

So demanding that rulings explicitly spell things out the way you're suggesting sounds kind of like a demand to violate the principles of Judicial restraint, which isn't going to happen.

I must have read too many Judge Posner opinions before starting my judicial clerkship for a judge serving on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, because early on I added into a draft opinion a passage that would have ordered an attorney to show cause for violating an important rule.