Not exact matches
Chuang ruled that the agencies were likely to succeed in proving that the travel ban portion of the executive order was intended to be a ban on Muslims and, as a result,
violates the U.S. Constitution's
religious freedom
protection.
Washington state argued that it
violated constitutional
protections against
religious discrimination.
Leon said the federal regulations for coverage of contraception
violated the equal
protection clause of the Constitution, the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and the Administrative Procedure Act.
It provides extra level of strict scrutiny
protection by requiring the government to demonstrate a compelling government interest for
violating someone's
religious liberty, and requires the infringement to be done in the least restrictive means.
Legislating your private
religious moral values onto the rest of us
violate our 1st Amendment
protections.
In the ruling, Judge Andrew Goodman wrote that the agency
violated the family's
religious protections and ordered them to remove the fostering ban from their file: «Their constitutional rights of freedom of religion and freedom of expression have been infringed and must be remedied in a manner that is appropriate and just in the circumstances.
Liberty argued that the ACA «
violated the constitution's Commerce Clause by forcing large employers to provide health insurance to full - time workers and
violated First Amendment
religious protections by subsidizing abortions,» Reuters states.
There has always been some tension between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise
protections of the First Amendment, but the Supreme Court, when considering a similar challenge to the
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 2005 — wherein the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that granting protections to religious prisoners amounted to a violation of the Establishment Clause — ruled that alleviating a state - imposed substantial burden on religious practice did not violate the Establishmen
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act in 2005 — wherein the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that granting
protections to
religious prisoners amounted to a violation of the Establishment Clause — ruled that alleviating a state - imposed substantial burden on religious practice did not violate the Establishmen
religious prisoners amounted to a violation of the Establishment Clause — ruled that alleviating a state - imposed substantial burden on
religious practice did not violate the Establishmen
religious practice did not
violate the Establishment Clause.
This means that excluding
religious schools may
violate not one but three separate constitutional provisions: the equal
protection clause, the free exercise clause (which protects the free exercise of religion), and the free speech clause.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court held that a «released time statute,» which allows students to leave school for part of the day to receive
religious instruction, does not
violate the Establishment or Equal
Protection clauses of the U.S. Constitution or the freedom of worship or district school sections of the Wisconsin Constitution.
The far - reaching question underlying the case is whether state constitutional provisions that strictly bar government aid to religion
violate religious freedom
protections in the First Amendment.