While the above is true, this situation
violates reasonable expectations of privacy, if not explicitly spelt out in the law (Some states make the Bedroom, Bathroom, and Hotel Rooms explicit.
Not exact matches
The United States Supreme Court released its judgment in City
Of Ontario, California, et al. v. Quon et al. today, deciding that when police officer Quon's employers examined his pager records, they did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights, because although he had a reasonable expectation of privacy, as the jury determined the employer's examination was for the legitimate, work - related purpose of deciding whether the current character limit in the contract with the provider was adequat
Of Ontario, California, et al. v. Quon et al. today, deciding that when police officer Quon's employers examined his pager records, they did not
violate his Fourth Amendment rights, because although he had a
reasonable expectation of privacy, as the jury determined the employer's examination was for the legitimate, work - related purpose of deciding whether the current character limit in the contract with the provider was adequat
of privacy, as the jury determined the employer's examination was for the legitimate, work - related purpose
of deciding whether the current character limit in the contract with the provider was adequat
of deciding whether the current character limit in the contract with the provider was adequate.
Edited to add: Texas is in the Fifth Circuit, which follows the rule that unauthorized drivers don't have standing to challenge a search / seizure even with the authorized driver's permission to drive the car; unauthorized drivers
of rental cars don't have a
reasonable expectation of privacy because they lack a possessory interest in the car and / or they're
violating the rental agreement.
Acceptable Use Policy, canadian charter
of rights and freedoms, criminal law case, employee handbook, employee's right to
privacy, employer - supplied laptop, employment law, police
violated Cole's right to
privacy, policies and procedures, policy manual, R. v. Cole,
reasonable expectation of privacy, search warrant, Supreme Court
of Canada, workplace policies and practices