... History is replete with examples of Believers and
the violent harm they do to, not only non-believers, but to people who simply believe differently than they.
Not exact matches
I am not sure I can answer all the objections, but I hope that my view will have fewer objections than the common view that God and Jesus are
violent deities which
do harm to people.
(from NY Times) the police
did not have a constitutional duty
to protect a person from
harm, even a woman who had obtained a court - issued protective order against a
violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
Violent events in our nation's schools have demonstrated that these «soft targets» are not sacred
to those seeking
to do harm.
I'm afraid that extremely
violent games or games filled with other questionable material may not be «
doing no
harm» even in those cases where the violence or objectionable content is used
to denounce the same.
Mr. Cooney tries
to use this same method
to teach people how a
violent game
does indeed
harm this young generation.
Sure, it's annoying
to others, but it's not likely
to cause a death or even serious physical
harm (unless perhaps you're seated next
to a
violent criminal with the means and intent
to do physical
harm).
One needs the other, for if all attention is directed
to the failing mother, we
do not see the ways that
violent and abusive fathers
harm their children.