If there were a move to make unions illegal, for example, political contributions would come fast and furious, though
virtually none of that money could be attributed to a stance on something as specific as tenure or teacher evaluations per se, even though those are issues unions would clearly also like to influence.
And there's no way if she holds the S&P — or
virtually none absent something happening with weapons
of mass destruction — she [won't] have all the
money she can possibly use.»