Religion knows it can't stand up to any sort of rational test, which is why it makes
a virtue out of faith — not questioning and accepting whatever answers you're given.
Not exact matches
The catechism, it will be seen, assigns belief in God and trust in God to two different
virtues, though as Benedict XVI's Spe salvi points
out, in several Biblical passages «the words «
faith» and «hope» seem interchangeable»; [10] but is either
of them to be counted as a
virtue?
Dr Dudley Plunkett brings
out how the Church expects theology to done in the context
of the
virtue of faith.
For example, as Mr. Lawler points
out, Brownson makes some valuable comments when he emphasizes the importance
of the solidarity and interdependence
of humans and what naturally follows from that, but it seems to me that Brownson then goes too far in concluding that «civic
virtues are themselves religious
virtues» and even that «he who dies on the battlefield for his country ranks with him who dies for his
faith.»
We'd all like to think that we live and work and pray from a center that is full
of bravery and hope --(and when I think
of the times when I have really stepped
out in
faith to follow Jesus, I think that perhaps we can indeed summon these
virtues from time to time)-- but I wonder if to deny the role that fear plays in our art, our
faith, and our theology is to deny one
of those dark but universal things that, deep down, we all have in common.
Dialogue, particularly with people
of other
faiths, holds
out the possibility
of conversion in many ways: conversion
of others to the fullness
of the
faith, conversion
of ourselves to a deeper living
of our own baptismal grace, conversion
of the culture to a nobler vision
of the human person encouraged by the many examples
of virtue to be found within and outside the Church.