Sentences with phrase «visitation orders of the court»

Not exact matches

He or she can help you identify precise examples of where your ex is violating the court ordered custody and / or visitation agreement and help you take steps toward resolving the issue amicably.

However, some courts will not order overnight visitations at all until a child reaches the age of 3, so you may want to check out the child custody laws in your state before filing a motion to request overnights.

Safe Haven Safe House Same Sex Marriage Sanction SCR (State Case Registry) SDNH (State Directory of New Hires) Self Incrimination Separate Property Separation Separation Agreement Sequester Service of Process SESA (State Employment Security Agency) Settlement Severance of Parental Rights Sexual Abuse Shared Parenting Slander Special Advocate Special Master Spouse Spousal Support Sole Custody Special Needs Child Split Custody SPLS (State Parent Locator Services) Spousal Maintenance Stalking Stare Decisis State Court Statute Stay of Proceedings Stay - Away Order Stepchild Stepparent Adoption Stipulation Stipulated Agreement Strike Structured Settlement Sua Sponte Subordination Subpoena Subpoena Ad Testificandum Subpoena Duces Tecum Substantive Law Success Fee Suit Summary Divorce Summary Judgment Summons Superior Court Supervised Access (Visitation) Surplusage

A California family court can order a parent or third party seeking custody or visitation of a child to undergo a drug test for illegal drug use, prior to making a custody determination.

From the perspective of the courts, visitation orders ensure that both parents spend time with their children.

As the number of family - related court filings has risen over the years, families have increasingly relied on the courts to resolve divorce issues and problems including child custody, visitation, child support, paternity, emergency protective orders, and restraining orders.

The court will order a parenting plan determining the timing and frequency of the noncustodial parent's visitation.

The court shall order sole parental responsibility with or without visitation to the other parent when it is in the best interests of the child.

This toolkit tells you how to ask for a custody, visitation, child support and medical support order if (1) you and the other parent are not married (or don't want a divorce), (2) you and the other parent have signed an «Acknowledgment of Paternity» and (3) there are no existing court orders about your child.

If a parent fails to comply with the provisions of a custody or visitation order and the other parent wants the court to enforce those provisions, the parent must file a court action against the other parent.

Custody and visitation orders may be modified if the court finds that a substantial change of circumstances has occurred.

Also signed off on were three bond resolutions one for a document management software system that will modernize government and save taxpayer dollars ($ 2 million); one for a playground for court - ordered visitation at the Pomona complex in service to child and parent visitation requirements ($ 375,000); and one for the continued repurposing of the Pomona complex with an eye on ensuring a complete one stop shopping hub for health and human services here in Rockland ($ 300,000).

During his time at the Pride Agenda he has been actively involved with the passage of dozens of laws, ordinances, regulations and Executive Orders on the state and local level affecting New York's LGBT community, including statewide measures like: the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act; the Hate Crimes Act of 2000; making the state's 9/11 relief inclusive of same - sex couples; guaranteeing domestic partners hospital visitation, legal authority over a loved one's bodily remains, access to Family Court and medical decision making authority; prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression in state employment; and securing over $ 50 million of funding for LGBT health and human services.

Next, the plan calls for the construction of new, more humanely designed jails in the civic center areas of each borough in order to make it easier for inmates to have visitation, meet their lawyers, and travel to court, a process that sometimes requires inmates to get up at 3 a.m. and miss meals, according to the report.

When parents divorce or separate, the court must make an order for custody and visitation of the minor child.

Kentucky Revised Statutes, Chapter 405, Section 21 states, «The Circuit Court may grant reasonable visitation rights to either the paternal or maternal grandparents of a child and issue any necessary orders to enforce the decree if it determines that it is in the best interest of the child to do so.»

In Vermont, the court first determines what custody and visitation schedule is in the best interests of the child, and then makes an order for joint custody (both parents) or sole custody (one parent).

Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitatiof Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation

Posted Wednesday, April 22nd, 2015 by Gregory Forman Filed under Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitatiof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation

However, although the underlying idea of sole physical custody assumes that the child will reside with one parent, the court has the power to order visitation.

In all three cases, the mothers» attitude went from «what excuses can I make to prevent the father from exercising visitation without being in violation of the court order?»

Tags: Contempt Enforcement Rule to Show Cause, Jurisprudence, The Honorable Wayne Morris Creech, Visitation Posted in Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 4 Comments&raquof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 4 Comments»

Posted Sunday, September 20th, 2009 by Gregory Forman Filed under Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitatiof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation

For a father who may want to be part of the child's life, the court can order visitation as well as rule on legal custody, which means the parent's right to make major life decisions on the child's behalf.

Even without your spouse's participation in the divorce proceeding, the court can enter orders regarding the effective dissolution of the martial estate, including property division, division of assets and debts, and orders affecting children — custody, visitation, child support — among others.

That sentence was stricken from the trial court's order, and the trial court had to resolve any unsettled issues of visitation.

There, the trial court's order provided for the appointment of a mediator to work out a visitation schedule between the parties and the child.

The court reasoned that in matters of child custody and visitation, where public policy makes paramount the best interests of the child, the Domestic Relations Law places the responsibility on the courts for making orders on that basis, irrespective of any bargain the parents have struck.

If the court concludes contact between a child and a parent will place the child in imminent danger of serious harm, the judge may issue an order either temporarily terminating that parent's access to the child or require the parent's visitation to be supervised until further order of the court.

Tags: Child Support, F.P. Segars - Andrews, Jurisprudence, Paternity, Popular Culture, Visitation Posted in Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquof Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments»

However, the Arizona Court of Appeals clarified in the case of Hart v. Hart that the court must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervCourt of Appeals clarified in the case of Hart v. Hart that the court must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervcourt must apply a different standard if the judge issues an order terminating a parents visitation or order that visitation is supervised.

An interesting decision was issued by the Arizona Court of Appeals in Munari v. Hotham regarding whether a stepparent could be held in contempt for violation of a court order for visitation of his or her spouse's cCourt of Appeals in Munari v. Hotham regarding whether a stepparent could be held in contempt for violation of a court order for visitation of his or her spouse's ccourt order for visitation of his or her spouse's child.

Posted Friday, August 27th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Support, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquof Orders, Jurisprudence, Law and Culture, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Of Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments&raquOf Interest to General Public, Paternity, Visitation 4 Comments»

A parent entitled to the custody of a child may not change the residence of the child to another state except upon order of the court or with the consent of the noncustodial parent, if the noncustodial parent has been given visitation rights by the decree.

After August 28, 1998, every court order establishing or modifying custody or visitation shall include the following language: «Absent exigent circumstances as determined by a court with jurisdiction, you, as a party to this action, are ordered to notify, in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and at least sixty days prior to the proposed relocation, each party to this action of any proposed relocation of the principal residence of the child, including the following information:

In evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parent.

If relocation of the child is proposed, a third party entitled by court order to legal custody of or visitation with a child and who is not a parent may file a cause of action to obtain a revised schedule of legal custody or visitation, but shall not prevent a relocation.

This will result in a modified visitation schedule that needs to be an order of the court.

A Clarke County Circuit Court enters a pendente lite order granting primary physical custody of the parties» three children to father, with visitation by mother, and orders father to pay $ 6,000 monthly on mother's credit cards, as spousal support, $ 9,000...

The refusal to accede to the Hague Convention or enter into any bilateral arrangements concerning the return of abducted children constitutes an extremely strong red flag that a country does not consider the abduction of children from other countries to be a serious matter, that it does not comply with international norms concerning international child abduction, and that it is most unlikely to follow a foreign court's orders concerning either custody or visitation.

The court will issue a visitation order if it determines that visitation is in the best interests of the child.

In particular, it is important to note that the courts below were not presented with any expert evidence concerning Japan's failure to enforce foreign or domestic custody and visitation orders, or as to its failure to recognize foreign custody orders or even any right of parental visitation.

If the custodial parent refuses, without justification, to let the other parent have court - ordered visitation, the court may order the custodial parent to comply with the terms of the visitation order.

However a mother who denies court - ordered visitation will be allowed to raise all number of justifications as to why the court shouldn't enforce its order (often the same justifications that were used to try to deny such fathers court - ordered visitation in the first place).

Also, changes to the Indiana Parenting Time Guidelines does not alone constitute good cause for amendment of an existing parenting time visitation order; however, a court or parties to a proceeding may refer to these guidelines in making changes to a parenting time order after the effective date of the guidelines.

If you are a parent who has been in a custody or visitation dispute with your child's other parent, you probably have a lot of unanswered questions about court orders.

Posted Tuesday, June 15th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 2 Comments&raquof Orders, Family Court Procedure, Jurisprudence, Litigation Strategy, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 2 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, South Carolina Specific, Visitation 2 Comments»

Posted Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments»

Posted Wednesday, August 4th, 2010 by Gregory Forman Filed under Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitatiof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, VisitatiOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation

Tags: Child Custody, Contempt Enforcement Rule to Show Cause, Litigation Strategy, Visitation Posted in Child Custody, Contempt / Enforcement of Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquof Orders, Litigation Strategy, Not South Carolina Specific, Of Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Court Litigants, Of Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments&raquOf Interest to Family Law Attorneys, Visitation 569 Comments»