The research represents one of the largest studies in the U.S. conducted to investigate the impact of home
visiting on child maltreatment, including nearly 8,000 families.
Not exact matches
Although there are studies of home
visiting that report effects of
child maltreatment on child and family outcomes, relatively few of them use rigorous methods that support drawing causal inferences about effectiveness.
Given the limited rigorous research evidence
on home
visiting's effectiveness to prevent child maltreatment, one potential impact of using an approach like Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness, which attaches state funding to the quality of the evidence, may be to increase the amount and quality of the child maltreatment prevention research conducted g
visiting's effectiveness to prevent
child maltreatment, one potential impact of using an approach like Home
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness, which attaches state funding to the quality of the evidence, may be to increase the amount and quality of the child maltreatment prevention research conducted g
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness, which attaches state funding to the quality of the evidence, may be to increase the amount and quality of the
child maltreatment prevention research conducted globally.
Overall, the research
on home
visiting to prevent
child maltreatment could be improved with use of rigorous methods, appropriate measures, longer follow - up periods, and inclusion of and reporting
on important subgroups.
In general, the research shows that home
visiting programs have the greatest, albeit still modest, effect
on parents» support for
children's learning and in reducing the prevalence of
child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.
This includes improved birth, health and
child development outcomes, and reductions in
child maltreatment.15 A number of SNHV programmes have also shown favourable effects
on healthcare usage, including rates of well -
child healthcare
visits.15
The evaluation will focus specifically
on children's school readiness and
child maltreatment in the years after families complete or exit home
visiting programs.
However, for both
child abuse and parent stress, the average effect sizes were not different from zero, suggesting a lack of evidence for effects in these areas.108 Earlier meta - analytic reviews have also noted the lack of sizable effects in preventing
child maltreatment — again citing the different intensity of surveillance of families in the treatment versus control groups as an explanation (though the authors did report that home
visiting was associated with an approximately 25 percent reduction in the rate of childhood injuries).109 Another review focusing
on the quality of the home environment also found evidence for a significant overall effect of home -
visiting programs.110 More recently, Harriet MacMillan and colleagues published a review of interventions to prevent
child maltreatment, and identified the Nurse - Family Partnership and Early Start programs as the most effective with regard to preventing
maltreatment and childhood injuries.
Research
on child maltreatment has increased over the past 15 years and meta - analyses and reviews of the literature
on the effectiveness of home
visiting programs to prevent child maltreatment exist.10, 11,12 However, until recently there was not a wide ranging systematic review of the evidence on home visiting.7, 13,14,15,16 An effort launched in 2009 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE), filled this gap by providing a systematic review of the early childhood home visiting research with particular attention to its applicability to the prevention of child maltr
visiting programs to prevent
child maltreatment exist.10, 11,12 However, until recently there was not a wide ranging systematic review of the evidence
on home
visiting.7, 13,14,15,16 An effort launched in 2009 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE), filled this gap by providing a systematic review of the early childhood home visiting research with particular attention to its applicability to the prevention of child maltr
visiting.7, 13,14,15,16 An effort launched in 2009 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Home
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE), filled this gap by providing a systematic review of the early childhood home visiting research with particular attention to its applicability to the prevention of child maltr
Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE), filled this gap by providing a systematic review of the early childhood home
visiting research with particular attention to its applicability to the prevention of child maltr
visiting research with particular attention to its applicability to the prevention of
child maltreatment.
Overall, the research
on home
visiting to prevent
child maltreatment could be improved with use of rigorous methods, appropriate measures, longer follow - up periods, and inclusion of and reporting
on important subgroups.
Although there are studies of home
visiting that report effects of
child maltreatment on child and family outcomes, relatively few of them use rigorous methods that support drawing causal inferences about effectiveness.
The program of prenatal and infancy home
visiting by nurses, tested with a primarily white sample, produced a 48 percent treatment - control difference in the overall rates of substantiated rates of
child abuse and neglect (irrespective of risk) and an 80 percent difference for families in which the mothers were low - income and unmarried at registration.21 Corresponding rates of
child maltreatment were too low to serve as a viable outcome in a subsequent trial of the program in a large sample of urban African - Americans, 20 but program effects
on children's health - care encounters for serious injuries and ingestions at
child age 2 and reductions in childhood mortality from preventable causes at
child age 9 were consistent with the prevention of abuse and neglect.20, 22
In general, the research shows that home
visiting programs have the greatest, albeit modest, effect
on parents» support for
children's learning and in reducing the prevalence of
child maltreatment, but that these effects are strongest for the most disadvantaged program participants.
A recent review offers ambiguous support for the relation between home visitation and reductions in
child maltreatment.2 The findings from several large - scale home - visitation efforts have shown disappointing short - term results in reducing family violence and
child maltreatment.4, 9 A 15 - year follow - up study of the Elmira trial families, however, provided the first evidence from a randomized trial for the long - term effects of home visitation
on reducing
child maltreatment.10 Results from the follow - up showed that nurse -
visited families had half as many
child maltreatment reports as families in the comparison group.
Initial Findings from a Randomized, Controlled Trial of Healthy Families Massachusetts: Early Program Impacts
on Young Mothers» Parenting (PDF - 576 KB) Easterbrooks, Jacobs, Bartlett, Goldberg, Contreras, & Kotake (2012) Offers an evaluation
on Healthy Families Massachusetts, a statewide
child maltreatment prevention home -
visiting program for first - time young parents, that examined the program's impact
on child maltreatment and parenting in a sample of young mothers.
Faucetta currently works
on the Mother and Infant Home
Visiting Evaluation (MIHOPE) project, which aims to assess the implementation and effects of home visiting programs intended to prevent child maltreatment, improve maternal and child health outcomes, and increase school re
Visiting Evaluation (MIHOPE) project, which aims to assess the implementation and effects of home
visiting programs intended to prevent child maltreatment, improve maternal and child health outcomes, and increase school re
visiting programs intended to prevent
child maltreatment, improve maternal and
child health outcomes, and increase school readiness.
She currently works
on MIHOPE, a large - scale evaluation that assesses the effects of home
visiting programs
on maternal and
child health outcomes,
child maltreatment, and school readiness.
She is currently working
on the implementation research and impact analyses for the Mother and Infant Home
Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), a large - scale national evaluation of home visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child development o
Visiting Program Evaluation (MIHOPE), a large - scale national evaluation of home
visiting programs that intend to prevent child maltreatment and improve maternal and child health, parenting skills, and child development o
visiting programs that intend to prevent
child maltreatment and improve maternal and
child health, parenting skills, and
child development outcomes.
«As home
visiting programs go to scale, states should consider replicating this study using their administrative data and appropriate statistical methods to create a robust comparison group capable of generating rigorous findings regarding the effects of early intervention efforts
on child maltreatment rates,» said Dr. Deborah Daro, Senior Research Fellow at Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago.
Faucetta currently works
on the Mother and Infant Home
Visiting Evaluation (MIHOPE) project, which aims to assess the implementation and effects of home visiting programs intended to prevent child maltreatment, improve maternal and child health outcomes, and incr
Visiting Evaluation (MIHOPE) project, which aims to assess the implementation and effects of home
visiting programs intended to prevent child maltreatment, improve maternal and child health outcomes, and incr
visiting programs intended to prevent
child maltreatment, improve maternal and
child health outcomes, and increase sch
Evidence - based home
visiting models have shown positive long - term impacts
on children in the long term, via increased school readiness, reduced
child maltreatment, and reduced lifetime arrests and convictions.
Child FIRST (Child and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordin
Child FIRST (
Child and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordin
Child and Family Interagency Resource, Support, and Training) is a home visitation program for low - income families with
children ages 6 - 36 months at high risk of emotional, behavioral, or developmental problems, or
child maltreatment, based on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordin
child maltreatment, based
on child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordin
child screening and / or family characteristics such as maternal depression.1 Families are
visited in their homes by a trained clinical team consisting of (i) a master's level developmental / mental health clinician, and (ii) a bachelor's level care coordinator.