Sean Penn (I Am Sam, Sweet and Lowdown) narrates, and he's fine, although a bit lackadaisical for the flashiness of
the visual style of the film.
The visual style of the film impresses, it's just that the jokes never quite catch fire like they should — they are more funny in the mind than in the gut.
Can you talk a little about
the visual style of the film?
I love
the visual style of the film and it is well represented here.
Not exact matches
Once the fear has passed, just in time for nap,
visual and musical
style are sometimes played in an immersive fashion by highlights in a directorial performance by Nicolas Winding Refn that bring some life to the
film, though not as much as John Turturro's inspired lead performance, which does about as much as anything in bring the final product to the brink
of decency, which is ultimately defied by the serious underdevelopment, overambition, monotonously unfocused dragging and near - punishingly dull atmospheric dryness that back a questionable drawn non-plot concept, and drive «Fear X» into mediocrity, in spite
of highlights than can't quite obscure the many shortcomings.
The
film, which initially resembles a sitcom both in its reliance on one - liners and in its decidedly uncinematic
visual style, slowly but surely wears out its welcome, however, as the affable vibe inevitably gives way to an emphasis on increasingly over-the-top action sequences - which wouldn't be quite so problematic had such moments been infused with even an ounce
of real excitement by director Shawn Levy.
There was potential for this
film to be melodramatic and overacted but I think, and this is typical
of a lot
of Argentinian
films I've seen, the
films are believably acted and they have a grit to their
visual style that is more realistic.
This is really the actor's moment to shine after over a decade in the black wig, working that cape like America's Next Top Model, increasingly alluring
visual - kei, Jrock star
styling and short appearances in each
of the
films.
The first fantasy
film that Mr McClure starred in which lead to him starring in three more out
of this world flicks that are all slightly similar... in
visual style at least.
Again, there's not much to the
visual flavor
of this
film, but
style is adequate enough to help liven certain elements up, even though it doesn't much serve selling the depth
of this story concept.
Formulaic, cheesy with its fluff and histrionics, - to the point
of superficializing a sense
of narrative weight, and inconsistent with its tone, pacing and overall structure, this
film falls as a pretty forgettable war drama, flavored up by the decent
visual style, worthy subject matter, lively direction and endearing performances which secure Jesse Hibbs» «To Hell and Back» as an almost thoroughly entertaining and sometimes effective, if ultimately underwhelming account
of Audie Murphy's struggles as a farm boy - turned - military man.
All in all, the
film is plenty conventional, even in a portrayal
of Ancient Rome that is about as thin as a lot
of the characterization, and as contrived as the melodramatics which slow down the impact
of momentum almost as much as dull and draggy spells, thus making for a script whose shortcomings are challenged well enough by a powerful score, immersively beautiful
visual style, solid direction, and strong lead acting for Henry Koster's «The Robe» to stand as an adequately rewarding and very intriguing study on the impact Christ had even on those who brought about his demise.
Alfred Hitchcock's 1960 masterpiece blends a brutal manipulation
of audience identification and an incredibly dense, allusive
visual style to create the most morally unsettling
film ever made.
In the end the taste
of H.K. filmmaking dominates in the
film's deliberately chaotic
visual style, a circular narrative that heads nowhere, and lyrical song interludes that abruptly interrupt the non-stop action and camera movement.
But since the look
of the
film is essentially 100 % attributable to Miller and his inability to stray away from the impressive
visual styles created for his previous project, «Sin City,» it can be assumed that much
of «The Spirit's» shortcomings are from the mind
of the notoriously morbid writer.
This
film has a number
of thrills, a beautiful
visual style and decent acting.
It has a marvelous ensemble cast and all the visceral impact and moment - to - moment tension
of a fine thriller, together with the distinctive
visual style of an art
film.
The result is a work that — like a whole sub-species
of French
films of the recent decades — fetishizes its own hyper - naturalistic
visual style and performances (all but one by non-actors) while offering no original or striking insights into the world it portrays.
Hallmarks
of Altman's aural and
visual style are evident everywhere - overlapping dialogue, life - like improvised roles and ensemble acting, multiple means
of communication to connect the characters (phone calls, tape recordings, radio and TV, and P.A. announcements), a continuously moving camera, long takes, and imaginative sound and
film editing.
Saddled as she is with Rushdie's hazy historical signposting, there's little excuse for Mehta's flat
visual style, particularly given the sensory vividness
of her earlier
films.
They sought inspiration in the era's art, specifically the work
of the photo - realists, who painted photographs in a
style that is both hyperreal and at one remove from reality — evoked by the variety
of reflecting surfaces seen in the
film — and the op artists, who deployed contrasting
visual elements to create vibrating surface tensions on a single plane.
All
of those devices presaged the signature
visual style that Frankenheimer would refine over his next few
films.
It's a
film that perfectly demonstrated Anderson's talent and unique
visual style, and it also gave audiences the first
of Anderson's young misfits, a type
of character that would remain at the forefront
of his work.
Kill Bill Vol.1 (2003) Continuing with his love for heroines the director delivers his most ambitious project to date, a mixture
of genres and
visual styles that expanded over two
films.
Given that all
of Refn's
films to date have provoked plenty
of discussion while managing to retain a distinct
visual style, we're intrigued to find out exactly where he plans on taking us with each
of these upcoming projects.
From the melodrama
of the earlier
films, Cowie distills Kurosawa's
visual style and touching characterisations, finding «the flair
of [a Sergei] Eisenstein» in No Regrets (p. 58), the sentiment
of Frank Capra in One Wonderful Sunday (p. 59), something
of «Bergman's youthful vision
of the world» in Drunken Angel (p. 60), and a «meticulous creation
of the urban milieu» in Scandal (p. 71).
Visually, Shore turns out to be adept at creating a
visual shorthand to his
film - one that both honors the vast iconography
of the Dracula character, while also managing to root that iconography in a new aesthetic (Medieval -
style period tropes) that feels fresh when married to this over-exhausted source material.
But in the end the taste
of H.K. filmmaking dominates in the
film's deliberately chaotic
visual style, a circular narrative that heads nowhere, and lyrical song interludes that abruptly interrupt the non-stop action and camera movement.
By far the best part
of the
film are the scenes set in the Judge Dredd
style mega city which owe a great
visual debt to Blade Runner and the idea
of a futuristic society ruled by the church is a really interesting one.
Typically, the
films have favored
visual flair over an intriguing story, but Self / less gives us the rare case
of an outwardly interesting premise becoming underwhelming, while the anticipated avant - garde
style is all but nonexistent.
Topics will range from thematic undercurrents and
visual styles (I hope to show how the
films develop a serious, even challenging
visual language that both reflects and informs current traits
of the modern blockbuster) and will also touch on more subtle or obscure details that deserve heightened focus.
The
films are swathed in his bedrock
style of deadpan comedy and aching melancholy within meticulously constructed
visuals.
The
film is shot in a lurid, colourful
style that, besides looking gorgeous, effectively gets us into the minds
of the characters, especially when Araki uses
visual trickery to portray dreams, drug trips and sexuality.
At least the strong all - star cast makes the most
of the vivid characters, and the
film's
visual style keeps...
But it's still a cut above the majority
of family entertainment, and director Paul King, who got his start helming the surreal cult comedy series The Mighty Boosh, continues to prove himself a confident and comparatively sophisticated stylist, employing cutaway sets, Rube Goldberg slapstick, animated sequences in different
styles, and loads
of visual gags to create the
film's dollhouse - storybook world; the aesthetic influence
of Wes Anderson is especially pronounced in the scenes set at the prison, where an early mishap involving a red sock and the prison laundry dyes the convicts» uniforms a Grand Budapest Hotel shade
of lavender pink.
Though it boasts a similar
visual style to a lot
of Mann's
films, the tension is almost non-existent, and despite an interesting dynamic between McAvoy's cop and Strong's robber, it's never fully explored, nor does it have the same allure
of seeing Hollywood heavyweights like Robert De Niro and Al Pacino face off.
Perhaps it's a question
of shot selection, as Gray — who has a painterly, shadowy
visual style, often reminiscent
of the great American
films of the 1970s — has stuck to a largely emotional logic in earlier
films; his compositions are wide or tight to reflect how characters feel.
The
film, which kicks off Directors» Fortnight at this year's Cannes, initially feels as though it might possess Noah Baumbach's knack for human observation given its curious mix
of Frances Ha's
visual style and While We're Young's dynamic.
Agnes Jaoui infuses the
film with a distinctive
visual style, peppering the
film with impressionistic paintings which fade into the drab surroundings
of the world
of the
film — the entrance to the driving school, a concrete slab
of a building — neatly linking into the
film's idea that romance fades into humdrum mediocrity.
It's a
film filled with lush
visuals and fans (like me)
of Francois Ozon's 2003 Swimming Pool will recognize the
stylings of cinematographer Yorick Le Saux.
Ridley Scott's
visual flair has led to a number
of handsome - looking
films (and a great deal
of success), but his tendency to go for
style over substance often leads to a slightly unsatisfactory feel to his
films.
The opening shots imply that the floridly romantic «
style» is not necessarily that
of the
film as a whole, but an idea
of the kind
of visual representation a group
of isolated, intelligent, impressionable, hormonal young women might make.
While it boasts a similar
visual style to a lot
of Mann's
films — saturated in a slick and steely blue hue — the tension is almost non-existent, and although there's an interesting dynamic at play between McAvoy's cop and Strong's robber, it's never fully explored, nor does it have the same allure
of seeing Hollywood heavyweights like Robert De Niro and Al Pacino face off against each other.
The cinematography displays some beautiful
visual style and along with the cast is one
of the
films strongest statements.
Ever since Alfred Hitchcock popularized the director cameo, audiences expect to see certain filmmakers pop up in small roles within their own
films; from Quentin Tarantino to Spike Lee to M. Night Shyamalan, the faces
of the directors are as expected as their distinct
visual styles.
Yet, like all the cinematographers
of his era, he worked on
films from all genres, in all
visual styles.
The
film is gratifyingly on point with its gender politics and
styled to perfection, with Caroline Koener's costumes offering a carousel
of visual pleasures.
I've been sceptical about this
film - maker's pictorial sense in the past, even in the widely admired Pan's Labyrinth from 2006, which called to my mind Tarantino's shrugging response to a certain kind
of film infatuated with its own
visuals: «Pretty pictures...» But Crimson Peak has more narrative sinew and black comic
style than this.
Yet it's in
style and tone that the
film comes alive, its prowling, dreamlike atmosphere, down - to - earth performances and unerring
visual confidence echoing early Terrence Malick or the best
of Harmony Korine.
The relationship between Joaquín and his wily brother Martín is beautifully handled, and the atmospheric
visual style, with its grey tones and subdued lighting, expertly captures the emotional pulse
of the
film.