Farrar J.A., dissenting, held that there was consent to the sexual activity, but that a new trial was required to determine whether consent was
vitiated by fraud 2013 NSCA 1 (CanLII), (2013 NSCA 1, 325 N.S.R. (2d) 95).
Not exact matches
The court made clear that the first question is whether the order has been
vitiated pursuant to contract law (ie,
by mistake, misrepresentation,
fraud, or undue influence) or
by failure to provide full and frank disclosure.
A property adjustment order could be challenged where there was an element of
fraud, collusion or other
vitiating factor and may be easier to challenge if the property transfer was reached
by consent.
«The respondent has patently exercised
fraud on power
by misuse of its power in breach of law,
by taking into account, extraneous matters and
by ignoring relevant matter,» the petition stated that the
vitiated process rendered the selection process «ultra vires» and a case of «
fraud on powers.»