Sentences with phrase «vitriolic debate»

Let me further add that often vitriolic debate at conferences is the venue for a multidisciplinary endeavour; it's common to demand credentials and infer vested interests as was asked of Bryan but it's underhand even though it is common practice amongst AGW debaters.

Nevertheless, the new report is likely to fuel the sometimes vitriolic debate between environmentalists who see free - roaming domestic cats as an invasive species — superpredators whose numbers are growing globally even as the songbirds and many other animals the cats prey on are in decline — and animal welfare advocates who are appalled by the millions of unwanted cats (and dogs) euthanized in animal shelters each year.

Those who suffer most in this increasingly ideological and vitriolic debate are teachers, who often are the first ones blamed for mediocre student results, which helps explain why half of them leave their posts in the first five years.

The proposal has generated a great deal of often vitriolic debate over the future of the wheat board, and the C.D. Howe Institute recently weighed in with a report arguing that global grain markets have changed significantly over the past few decades, to the point that the CWB is more often than not a price taker.

And if the president wants to disentangle the education reform movement from today's vitriolic debates over the federal role, he would be smart to sign it.

Not exact matches

It sparked heated debate and vitriolic rebukes among the Congressmen.

After months of a vitriolic campaign and two bruising debates, what's left to be unveiled, asked University of Cincinnati political scientist David Niven.

The two engaged in lively debates; television became a huge battleground, littered with vitriolic ads paid for by outside interests.

Perhaps this reads more like a list of popular games but I suppose that's to be expected in a unquantifiable subjective poll, though I suppose if the intention was to spark debate Guiness have probably been sucessful, even if the debate is of the vitriolic kind.

So are you saying that we could disprove theory X if only we could see how vitriolic the correspondence was between scientists debating theory X?