Because their prices can be so sensitive to interest rates, strategists at BlackRock generally prefer stocks outside what they call the «RUST» belt of real estate, utilities, staples and telecoms — where low -
volatility funds tend to have bigger concentrations than S&P 500 index funds.
Another risk lies in the areas of the market that low -
volatility funds tend to favour.
Not exact matches
The higher
volatility of bear markets
tends to chop up these
funds over time.
Those stocks also
tend to hold up better in periods of
volatility, when hedge
funds often sell their large - cap stocks to boost their own liquidity.
While
volatility isn't always a terrible thing - some of that
volatility is upward - the best - performing
funds over time
tend to be those that post consistently solid returns relative to their
volatility rank.
In the Global Allocation
Fund, we have increased exposure to quality companies with stable cash flows in more defensive sectors, particularly within healthcare and consumer staples, where demand
tends to be more inelastic and may be able to withstand increased market
volatility.
Funds tend to have lower dividend yields than large - cap funds and to have somewhat higher volati
Funds tend to have lower dividend yields than large - cap
funds and to have somewhat higher volati
funds and to have somewhat higher
volatility.
Investors typically own short - term bond
funds as a low - risk vehicle to preserve their principal, so losses in this segment
tend to be more upsetting than a downturn in investments such as stock
funds where
volatility can be expected.
As the
Fund tracks the US stock market excluding the S&P 500 Index, which comprise 500 large cap companies, the companies tracked by the
Fund would be significantly smaller in market capitalization, and would
tend to be less mature with higher
volatility.
By contrast, high - quality bonds such as those found in investment - grade corporate
funds like the iShares 1 - 3 Year Credit Bond ETF (CSJ A-89) and the iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD A-66), etc.), or in Treasury portfolios such as the iShares 1 - 3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY A-97) or the iShares 10 - 20 Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLH B - 65), etc.)
tend to buffer portfolio
volatility to a much greater degree.
We expected
volatility such as this when we launched the
fund — the small number of stocks and relatively large positions
tends to mean a volatile unit price.
Same thing for hedge
funds; they
tend to be
volatility - averse on average; and their investors may be technically more sophisticated than mutual
fund investors, in practice, they make the same mistake of chasing performance.
In my opinion, because of hedge
fund - of -
funds, which like nerds,
volatility tends to hurt hedge
funds in aggregate, but not by much.
Closed - end
funds tend to trade with higher
volatility from their NAV than ETFs because ETFs have authorized participants that actively follow the shares and take action to reconcile the price in the open market when it deviates from the NAV.
High quality businesses are attractive because their intrinsic value
tends to grow with low
volatility through time, and they're not dependent on the capital markets to
fund their businesses.
Additionally, since the
fund is comprised of NASDAQ stocks, it will
tend to more more volatile than a broader market index like the S&P 500 and of course, other safe investments with lower
volatility that rely on income for net returns rather than capital appreciation.
As average returns across
funds tend to smooth out performance
volatility due to the imperfect correlation between these
funds, we also charted the performance statistics for quintile portfolios by return for the 36
funds that had full performance data for our analysis period.
This change in the discount or premium of the shares of closed end
funds tends to magnify the
volatility of the underlying securities.