Sentences with phrase «volcanic effects saying»

Not exact matches

«We know that volcanic activity can have a major effect on the environment, so the big question was, how are these two events related,» Macdonald said in a statement Monday.

What I am saying is that it makes no sense at all to hand - wave at the effects of uncontrolled volcanic eruptions as «absolute proof» that geoengineering schemes «can work», while promoting a gradual 50 - year phaseout of GHG emissions (which is too slow to have any hope of preventing catastrophic outcomes) as «logical» (whatever that means) and ignoring the multiple studies that show we can easily phase out emissions in a fraction of that time with the proven technologies that are already at hand.

What he really means, of course, is that additional volcanic activity, had it taken place, would have added more aerosols, thus slowing the overall dissipation, which would in turn have enhanced the cooling effect of said aerosols.

I say usually, since there are cases such as the trees flattened by the Tunguska impact, or buried by volcanic ash, that quite obviously recorded direct effects these event.

Victor, if an absence of volcanic aerosols results from their «dissipation» and this in turn results in a «rebound» as you say it does, is not such a «rebound» a «real effect» resulting from an «absence» (or more usually a partial absence) of volcanic aerosols?

Having said that, 1258 itself was a horrendous year but the volcanic effects were very short lived.

In the abstract you say that you can easily define certain effects (in the MWP period) such as GHG influence, «the reconstructions of solar, volcanic and land use - related forcing are more uncertain».

«This is a consequence of variations in heat exchange between the atmosphere and the oceans, and other decade - to - decade changes like variations in solar forcing and the solar dimming effects of pollution and volcanic eruptions,» BoM says.

The effects on health statistics, can also be from other mechanisms say from volcanics where both extremal temps can prevail ie hot summers and cold winters such as laki where the airborne pollution was also a significant factor in both decreasing the availability of food (PAR) and respiratory ailments.

Backing that up, NASA says that 1) sea surface temperature fluctuations (El Niño - La Niña) can cause global temperature deviation of about 0.2 °C; 2) solar maximums and minimums produce variations of only 0.1 °C, warmer or cooler; 3) aerosols from natural sources such as volcanic eruptions (Mount Pinatubo for example) have caused average cooling of 0.3 °C, but recent eruptions have had not had significant effect.

I'm not interested in where you ski, but that it seems you're saying volcanic activity and hot material reaching the earth's crust have no effect on temperature or climate.

Volcanic effects have been exaggerated, as I've discussed above and you have said many times there is little evidence that volcanic effect is anything near what the models Volcanic effects have been exaggerated, as I've discussed above and you have said many times there is little evidence that volcanic effect is anything near what the models volcanic effect is anything near what the models produce.