If important, why wasn't
volcanic forcing in the «Natural» portion of the diagrams?
Willis, AFAIK there is no deliberate kludge related to
volcanic forcing in CMIP5 models.
Finally, I add an error standard deviation of 0.05 W / m ² for uncertainty in
volcanic forcing in 1871 — 1880 and a further 0.05 W / m ² for uncertainty therein in 2002 — 2011, small though volcanic forcing was in both decades.
Thus the RCP scenarios assume the long - term average
volcanic forcing in the future, and they hold it constant, which is reasonable because as you say we can't predict the next eruption.
You end up with NH ocean being 3C warmer than SH oceans plus «super recovery» from
volcanic forcing in the NH, but that is only a fraction of the ocean area.
It has to do with the fact that there is an enhanced sensitivity to
volcanic forcing in the Esper et al series, owing to its bias towards the summer seasonal and extratropical continental centers.
I have deliberately not included
the volcanic forcing in either the observed or projected values since that is a random element — scenarios B and C didn't do badly since Pinatubo went off in 1991, rather than the assumed 1995 — but getting volcanic eruptions right is not the main point here.
The main difference between projections A and B appears to have been the projected
volcanic forcings in ~ 1995 and ~ 2015.
Not exact matches
Was it rock grinding on rock, ice groaning over ice, or, perhaps, hot gases and liquid rock
forcing their way through cracks
in a
volcanic complex?
One way is extrusion,
in which magma erupts through
volcanic craters and cracks
in the Earth's surface; the other is intrusion, whereby magma
forces itself between or through existing formations of rock, without reaching the surface.
The models, which factor
in natural effects such as solar winds and
volcanic eruptions, along with anthropogenic
forcings like greenhouse gases and aerosols, match these precipitation variations accurately
in trend and reasonably well
in magnitude.
Professor Sybren said: «It can be excluded, however, that this hiatus period was solely caused by changes
in atmospheric
forcing, either due to
volcanic eruptions, more aerosols emissions
in Asia, or reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
The only variations are
in the
volcanic forcing files.
The simple question of whether the medieval period was warm or cold is not particularly interesting — given the uncertainty
in the
forcings (solar and
volcanic) and climate sensitivity, any conceivable temperature anomaly (which remember is being measured
in tenths of a degree) is unlikely to constrain anything.
Solar and
volcanic activity are the main natural
forcings included
in the Huber and Knutti study.
Forcing caused by changes in the Sun's brightness, by dust in the atmosphere, or by volcanic aerosols can also be translated into radiative f
Forcing caused by changes
in the Sun's brightness, by dust
in the atmosphere, or by
volcanic aerosols can also be translated into radiative
forcingforcing.
Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is properly done
in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various
forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or
volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate change
in detail.
2000, except that they used a large
forcing for solar (10x) and
volcanic (5x)
in separate runs to see if the relative influence of both may need to be adjusted, as the Hadcm3 model possibly underestimates the — relative — weaker
forcings.
I suppose it is possible that some other natural
forcing not included
in the solar variations and
volcanic activity may have been incorporated into the anthropogenic side of their equation.
And finally, current theories based on greenhouse gas increases, changes
in solar,
volcanic, ozone, land use and aerosol
forcing do a pretty good job of explaining the temperature changes over the 20th Century.
Therefore, the solar
forcing combined with the anthropogenic CO2
forcing and other minor
forcings (such as decreased
volcanic activity) can account for the 0.4 °C warming
in the early 20th century, with the solar
forcing accounting for about 40 % of the total warming.
On top of that, there was a substantial El Nino early
in the sequence and a La Nina following the
volcanic eruption
in 1965 which together with the very low trend
in forcings may have tipped the temperature record negative.
They got 10 pages
in Science, which is a lot, but
in it they cover radiation balance, 1D and 3D modelling, climate sensitivity, the main feedbacks (water vapour, lapse rate, clouds, ice - and vegetation albedo); solar and
volcanic forcing; the uncertainties of aerosol
forcings; and ocean heat uptake.
[Response: «
in the absence of other unknowns» — aerosol
forcing, ocean heat uptake, internal variability, underestimates of solar and
volcanic forcing... — gavin]
Constraining ECS from the observed responses to individual
volcanic eruptions is difficult because the response to short - term
volcanic forcing is strongly nonlinear
in ECS, yielding only slightly enhanced peak responses and substantially extended response times for very high sensitivities (Frame et al., 2005; Wigley et al., 2005a).
Santer et al
in the PNAS paper also provide some additional tests
in examining scenarios with much greater solar and
volcanic forcings than observed
in the real world.
The long timescales (even ignoring the «Earth system» responses like ice sheets and vegetation) are not easy to get at
in the instrumental record or by studying «abrupt
forcing» events like
volcanic eruptions.
The uncertainty
in the overall amplitude of the reconstruction of
volcanic forcing is also important for quantifying the influence of volcanism on temperature reconstructions over longer periods, but is difficult to quantify and may be a substantial fraction of the best estimate (e.g., Hegerl et al., 2006a).
These phenomena — sun spots, a slightly different earth orbit, a decrease
in volcanic activity — intermittently warmed the region through increased radiative
forcing, and recently have been joined by a new
force: greenhouse gases.
Many of the international airlines which service Bali have been
forced to cancel flights into and out of Bali due to the high level of
volcanic ash
in the skies over and surrounding Bali.
A product of erosion and
volcanic forces, the views from
in amongst these knobbly pillars extend over the town of Graaff - Reinet and the plains of the Camdeboo.
Welcome to Iceland, a country whose culture is deeply rooted
in ancient heritage and where powerful
volcanic forces have forged a rugged but beautiful land.
The eruptions have caused
volcanic ash rain
in nearby villages,
forcing residents to flee to the southern part of Bali.
Mount Agung erupted
in late November, spreading
volcanic ash to nearby areas and
forcing I Gusti Ngurah Rai International Airport and Lombok International Airports to close for several days.
Hundreds of passengers are facing travel disruption after a
volcanic eruption
in Indonesia sent ash clouds over the region,
forcing airlines to cancel flights to and from Northern Australia.
The response of that model to
volcanic forcings, the last ice age, changes
in orbital parameters etc. are all «out - of - sample» tests that are not fixed by adjusting parameters.
The
forcing from 1900 to mid-century was mostly natural... mostly solar, a bit of lack - of -
volcanic, maybe some black carbon
in the arctic.
In addition, since the global surface temperature records are a measure that responds to albedo changes (volcanic aerosols, cloud cover, land use, snow and ice cover) solar output, and differences in partition of various forcings into the oceans / atmosphere / land / cryosphere, teasing out just the effect of CO2 + water vapor over the short term is difficult to impossibl
In addition, since the global surface temperature records are a measure that responds to albedo changes (
volcanic aerosols, cloud cover, land use, snow and ice cover) solar output, and differences
in partition of various forcings into the oceans / atmosphere / land / cryosphere, teasing out just the effect of CO2 + water vapor over the short term is difficult to impossibl
in partition of various
forcings into the oceans / atmosphere / land / cryosphere, teasing out just the effect of CO2 + water vapor over the short term is difficult to impossible.
Volcanic activity is indicated by Stratospheric Aerosol
forcing in the link below.
Finally, look up Rahmstorf and Foster 2011 — it shows that if you account for El Nino,
volcanic eruptions and changes
in solar
forcing, the warming has continued apace.
Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is properly done
in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various
forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse gases or
volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate change
in detail.
One way to interpret this is that anthropogenic
forcings are a significant cause of AMO variability (
in addition to solar, ENSO,
volcanic and anything else that affects climate).
You can show quite easily that without water - vapour feedbacks (for instance), you can not get a good match to
volcanic forcings and responses
in the real world (Soden et al, 2005), or to ENSO, or to the long term trends.
I suppose it is possible that some other natural
forcing not included
in the solar variations and
volcanic activity may have been incorporated into the anthropogenic side of their equation.
The model results (which are based on driving various climate models with estimated solar,
volcanic, and anthropogenic radiative
forcing changes over this timeframe) are, by
in large, remarkably consistent with the reconstructions, taking into account the statistical uncertainties.
While the suspended dust can temporarily block sunlight, the dominant effect
in volcanic forcing is the sulphur, which combines with water to form sulphuric acid droplets.
The interest
in these records is for what they can tell us about natural variability, spatial patterns of change, responses to solar or
volcanic forcing, teleconnections etc. — it's all interesting and useful, but it is nothing like as important as the outside interest shown
in these studies might suggest.
The 1988 GISS climate model included
volcanic forcing as well as a prediction of what would happen
in the future if a large tropical volcano went boom.
gavin: You can show quite easily that without water - vapour feedbacks (for instance), you can not get a good match to
volcanic forcings and responses
in the real world (Soden et al, 2005)...
In fact, there is reasonably compelling evidence that changes in drought in the western U.S. over the past millennium may, in large part, reflect the forced response of ENSO to past volcanic and solar radiative forcin
In fact, there is reasonably compelling evidence that changes
in drought in the western U.S. over the past millennium may, in large part, reflect the forced response of ENSO to past volcanic and solar radiative forcin
in drought
in the western U.S. over the past millennium may, in large part, reflect the forced response of ENSO to past volcanic and solar radiative forcin
in the western U.S. over the past millennium may,
in large part, reflect the forced response of ENSO to past volcanic and solar radiative forcin
in large part, reflect the
forced response of ENSO to past
volcanic and solar radiative
forcing.