Not exact matches
Their findings: natural influences such as
changes in the amount of sunlight or
volcanic eruptions did not explain the warming trends, but the results matched when increasing levels of greenhouse
gas emissions were added to the mix.
The researchers warn, however, that the future evolution of the AMO remains uncertain, with many factors potentially affecting how it interacts with atmospheric circulation patterns, such as Arctic sea ice loss,
changes in solar radiation,
volcanic eruptions and concentrations of greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere.
For the first time, this study allowed researchers to analyse the effects of the climate
change on the forest nutrient cycles, and states that Pyrenean forests can register these episodes chemical mark at a global scale (for instance,
volcanic eruptions in remote areas) and the effects of
gas emissions into the atmosphere since the Industrial Revolution.
Professor Sybren said: «It can be excluded, however, that this hiatus period was solely caused by
changes in atmospheric forcing, either due to
volcanic eruptions, more aerosols emissions in Asia, or reduced greenhouse
gas emissions.
Barnhart said the
changes from dry to wet periods might have had to do with periods of greenhouse -
gas outgassing associated with
volcanic eruptions, large impacts, or a
change in the tilt of Mars» rotation, though all that remains to be studied further.
Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is properly done in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse
gases or
volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate
change in detail.
And finally, current theories based on greenhouse
gas increases,
changes in solar,
volcanic, ozone, land use and aerosol forcing do a pretty good job of explaining the temperature
changes over the 20th Century.
In the past,
volcanic eruptions caused by
changes at plate boundaries have warmed the atmosphere by pumping out greenhouse
gases.
Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is properly done in detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse
gases or
volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate
change in detail.
Thus the
changes in the stratosphere are basically a function of the greenhouse
gases, ozone levels and
volcanic aerosols there.
Also, due to the multiplicity of anthropogenic and natural effects on the climate over this time (i.e. aerosols, land - use
change, greenhouse
gases, ozone
changes, solar,
volcanic etc.) it is difficult to accurately define the forcings.
They include
changes in solar irradiance, greenhouse
gases, tropospheric aerosols, and
volcanic aerosols.
Investigating the cause of 20th Century warming is done in so - called detection and attribution studies, which analyze the various forcings (e.g., solar variations, greenhouse
gases or
volcanic activity) and the observed time and space patterns of climate
change in detail.
Any
change in the strength of natural (
volcanic, solar) influences based on historical variations will have an opposite effect on the influence of greenhouse
gases, and thus on man - made emissions.
The warming period from about 1920 — 1950 has been attributed to a combination of greenhouse
gases (which were increasing through the period to some extent), solar
changes, and unusually low
volcanic activity.
The argument that larger sensitivity for natural (mainly solar and
volcanic) goes at the cost of the sensitivity for natural and man - made greenhouse
gases, or enhanced variability during pre-industrial times, would result in a redistribution of weight towards the role of natural factors in forcing temperature
changes, seems to rely on a model like the following: T = a * ANTHRO + b * NAT
Some of these forcings are well known and understood (such as the well - mixed greenhouse
gases, or recent
volcanic effects), while others have an uncertain magnitude (solar), and / or uncertain distributions in space and time (aerosols, tropospheric ozone etc.), or uncertain physics (land use
change, aerosol indirect effects etc.).
Recently I have been looking at the climate models collected in the CMIP3 archive which have been analysed and assessed in IPCC and it is very interesting to see how the forced
changes — i.e. the
changes driven the external factors such as greenhouse
gases, tropospheric aerosols, solar forcing and stratospheric
volcanic aerosols drive the forced response in the models (which you can see by averaging out several simulations of the same model with the same forcing)-- differ from the internal variability, such as associated with variations of the North Atlantic and the ENSO etc, which you can see by looking at individual realisations of a particular model and how it differs from the ensemble mean.
One driver of temperatures in this region is the abundance and variability of ozone, but water vapor,
volcanic aerosols, and dynamical
changes such as the Quasi - Biennial Oscillation (QBO) are also significant; anthropogenic increases in other greenhouse
gases such as carbon dioxide play a lesser but significant role in the lower stratosphere.
The missing panel, titled «
Changing Climate,» states that «
Volcanic eruptions and burning fossil fuels increase the amount of carbon dioxide and other heat - trapping
gases in the atmosphere.
Tagsclimate
change, global warming, Man - Made Climate Change, human activity, greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, Volcanic activity, environment, Warming Climate, Industrial Revolution, Industri
change, global warming, Man - Made Climate
Change, human activity, greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, Volcanic activity, environment, Warming Climate, Industrial Revolution, Industri
Change, human activity, greenhouse
gases, carbon dioxide,
Volcanic activity, environment, Warming Climate, Industrial Revolution, Industrial era
This is the portion of temperature
change that is imposed on the ocean - atmosphere - land system from the outside and it includes contributions from anthropogenic increases in greenhouse
gasses, aerosols, and land - use
change as well as
changes in solar radiation and
volcanic aerosols.
In the first instance, the frequency of extreme summers was calculated in climate models where both human - caused (
changes in greenhouse
gases, aerosols and ozone) and natural (solar radiation
changes and
volcanic) climate factors were included.
But who's to say that if we had enough data and understanding, these spikes and dips could not be thoroughly explained by solar influences,
volcanic eruptions, greenhouse
gas changes, ice sheet dynamics, etc..?
The red line incorporates natural influences like
changes in solar output and
volcanic activity but virtually all of the long - term warming is attributable to human - caused increases in greenhouse
gasses.
«We use 1280 years of control simulation, with constant preindustrial forcings including constant specified CO2, and a five - member ensemble of historical simulations from 1850 — 2005 including prescribed historical greenhouse
gas concentrations, SO2 and other aerosol - precursor emissions, land use
changes, solar irradiance
changes, tropospheric and stratospheric ozone
changes, and
volcanic aerosol (ALL), following the recommended CMIP5 specifications.
We also use five - member ensembles of simulations with greenhouse
gas changes only (GHG),
volcanic and solar irradiance
changes only (NAT), and aerosol
changes only (AER) over the period 1850 — 2010.»
The literature since the AR4, and the availability of more simulations of the last millennium with more complete forcing, including solar,
volcanic and greenhouse
gas influences, and generally also land use
change and orbital forcing) and more sophisticated models, to a much larger extent coupled climate or coupled earth system models, some of them with interactive carbon cycle, strengthens these conclusions.
«Since 1997, when Pinatubo's aerosol settled out, the stratosphere has been exceptionally clear... Half or more of the warming since 1995 may due to the lack of large
volcanic eruptions... That's about 0.13 °C... The remaining climate
change is presumably caused by other forces, such as solar variability, El Nino, Atlantic AMO warming in 1995, lower Albedo and maybe even a little greenhouse
gas.»
We instead conclude that solar forcing probably had a minor effect on Northern Hemisphere climate over the past 1,000 years, while,
volcanic eruptions and
changes in greenhouse
gas concentrations seem to be the most important influence over this period.
The BEST team found that greenhouse
gases and
volcanic eruptions could account for most of the observed temperature
change, and suggest that the remainder of the variability is fairly consistent with the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), an ocean cycle, and very little contribution from
changes in solar activity (Figure 2).
Whether there be radiative
gases, biosphere
changes,
volcanic events, ocean cycles, solar cycles, albedo variations or asteroid strikes the same mechanism restores balance over time.
«Climate models used historic data for factors like greenhouse
gas concentrations, solar output,
volcanic eruptions, air pollution, and other factors that can affect the climate through 2005 or so, but after that point made assumptions of how these would
change in the future.
Difficult, complicated science questions like the interplay between natural climate variability (e.g.,
volcanic eruptions, solar minimums, the El Niño - La Niña cycle) and manmade, fossil fuel - based energy consumption — which accelerates greenhouse
gas emissions and drives climate
change — still need further clarification.
10 Heat Storage: Mostly the Oceans 1955 - 1996; Levitus et al. 2001: Science World Ocean = 18.2 x10 22 Joules Atmosphere = 0.7 x10 22 Joules Land Ice = 0.8 x10 22 Joules observed Modeled Model includes forcing from Greenhouse
Gases, Sulfate Aerosols Solar irradiance
changes, and
volcanic aerosols.
Also, regarding subsea volacanic eruptions — a
volcanic eruption involves release of magma at several thousand degrees C plus superheated
gases — when that hits cold sea water you are going to have a very violent and explosive
change of form from lquid water to steam combined with the release of dissolved
gases (mostly CO2)-- I am not sure what laws of Chemistry and Physics you are looking at, but I would suggest that that those bubbles and heated
gases and water will rise to to the surface very quickly and have a major local effect on any nearby ice.
Conversely, holding greenhouse
gas concentrations and sulfur emissions at their 1998 values and allowing solar insolation, SOI, and
volcanic sulfates to evolve as observed generates a forecast that is consistent with the observed pattern of temperature
change.
The model included a more comprehensive set of natural and human - made climate forcings than previous studies, including
changes in solar radiation,
volcanic particles, human - made greenhouse
gases, fine particles such as soot, the effect of the particles on clouds and land use.
How incredibly arrogant that so many believe humans are
changing the climate when enormous
volcanic events shaded the sun over large continents for years — spewing poisonous
gases.
The primary drivers of these cloud
changes appear to be increasing greenhouse
gas concentrations and a recovery from
volcanic radiative cooling.
Traditionally, climate - model projections have only accounted for external forcings, such as man - made greenhouse
gases, past
volcanic eruptions and projected
changes in solar output.
The internally imposed structural
changes to the climate system include the injection of the non-condensing greenhouse
gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, CFCs, etc),
volcanic and anthropogenic aerosols, and episodic contact to the deep ocean cold temperature reservoir (this is responsible for the «natural», «internally forced», or «unforced» variability of the climate system).
Over the next decade,
changes in climate are expected to be due to a combination of anthropogenic
changes in atmospheric greenhouse -
gas and aerosol concentrations; natural variations in
volcanic and solar activity, and natural, unforced internal variability.
The only direct real - world inputs to these models, in a climate
change simulation context, are
changes in atmospheric chemistry and composition (such as increasing greenhouse
gases, or
changing volcanic aerosols) and
changes in solar radiation.
-- paleoclimate data reflecting past climate states very different from today — climate response to
volcanic eruptions, solar
changes and other non-greenhouse
gas forcings — timescales different from those relevant for climate stabilization, such as the climate response to
volcanic eruptions
If it is mainly greenhouse
gases, the trend should go on to the positive side... Of course, a large
volcanic eruption may — temporarely —
change that all.
But to quantify the influences (or «forcings» in climate jargon) even further, they considered three anthropogenic forcings — well - mixed greenhouse
gases, sulfate aerosols, and tropospheric and stratospheric ozone — as well as two natural forcings —
changes in solar irradiance and
volcanic aerosols — all of which are likely to influence tropopause height.»
There have been numerous research papers and reviews published over the past 10 years, including several in prestigious journals such as Nature and Science, that conclude that the observed temperature
changes over the past 100 years are consistent with the combined
changes in atmospheric aerosols (
volcanic and anthropogenic), land surface
changes, variations in solar irradiance and increases in greenhouse
gases.
Modellers were able to «peek at the answer» since they could not only observe inputs to the climate system (such as historical greenhouse
gas levels,
volcanic activity, solar
changes and so forth) but also the simulation targets, namely average temperatures, when tuning their models.
The drivers of climate over this period are chiefly orbital, solar,
volcanic,
changes in land use / land cover and some variation in greenhouse
gas levels.