There is high variability in the solar and
volcanic influences on the climate (top row) while greenhouse gas influences rise over time (bottom row).
Bertrand was investigating the effect of solar and
volcanic influence on climate and concluded «these are clearly not sufficient to explain the observed 20th century warming and more specifically the warming trend which started at the beginning of the 1970s».
Figure 2: Derivatives of SOI (dark line) and MSU GTTA (light line) for the period 1981 — 2007 after removing periods
of volcanic influence (McLean 2009).
These temperature increases can not be attributed easily to
volcanic influences and are most probably solar in origin.»
So find a slice on history with zero
volcanic influence, then you have your Volcanic Zero Baseline.
As the graph shows, in addition to aerosol pollution (the sulphate line),
volcanic influences were increasingly negative during the period of global cooling, and solar forcing slightly declined.
The Hansen paper is an extreme case, combining a strong volcanic forcing with a model with high sensitivity, and so probably provides an upper bound for
the volcanic influence on temperature.
However, as both Lean and Rind (2008) and Foster and Rahmstorf (2011) have shown, once solar and
volcanic influences, anthropogenic warming, and ENSO variations are accounted for, there is very little variation left.
Indeed, it is true that the solar and
volcanic influences are the most poorly estimated, especially early in the centuryand it is also true that the observations of global average temperature are least well established during this period.
In the case of the SST datasets analysed by Thompson et al. it looks to me that natural variability (
volcanic influences, ENSO etc.) have conspired to make a relatively gradual trend look like a sudden one.