Oklahoma is the only high
volume dog breeder state without state regulations of facilities moving large numbers of dogs or cats.
Not exact matches
Conducted in Italy, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United
States, all of the studies found that upon adulthood, the puppies from these high -
volume breeding facilities were more likely to show behavioral and emotional problems that cause distress, when compared with
dogs from other sources, especially those from non-commercial
breeders.
For too long, Ohio has ranked among the worst of
states in allowing the neglect and mistreatment of
dogs by high -
volume commercial
breeders.
Ohio is one of 28
states that regulates 255 registered «high -
volume»
dog breeders.
Ohio law
states a high -
volume breeder produces more than nine litters of puppies and, or sells 60 or more puppies and
dogs in a year.
S.B. 130, to regulate the
state's «high
volume»
breeders and
dog retailers, those that keep unspayed
dogs that produce 9 litters of puppies each year and «for a fee or other consideration, sell» 60 or more adult
dogs or puppies annually.
The law imposes new measures to curb many of the worst abuses of high
volume dog breeders that are prevalent in the
state.
Donald Landes, who owns a high -
volume dog breeding operation in the village of Eldorado in Preble County said he believes the
state law, and new requirements such as
state inspections, will help Ohio's
dog breeders take good care of the animals.
The new laws will help the
state weed out puppy mills from good high -
volume dog breeders, said Linda Tucker a regular volunteer at PAWS Adoption Center in Middletown, a pet shelter.
Although only two high -
volume breeders have registered with the
state in many of Ohio's southwestern counties, there are bound to be more
dog breeders still operating without a license, despite the new law, Mark Kumpf, the Montgomery County Animal Resource Center Director said.
The definition of a «high
volume retail
breeder» would include those
breeders who routinely sell puppies on a co-ownership basis regardless of the fact that many of the
dogs may be in other
states and not on the
breeders» premises.
S.B. 130 proponents claim a central bureaucracy to enable high
volume dog breeders is better than relying on local or even cross-county or existing
state enforcement agencies to inspect, penalize and shut down
breeders in violation of the law.