Even if they do, there are new challenges on the horizon, including advances in technology such as the proliferation of smart phones, resulting in high
volumes of electronic evidence.
A relatively new breed of e-discovery lawyer has emerged as the sheer
volume of electronic evidence began to multiply in cases, resulting in a need for better management, according to Dera Nevin, managing counsel, e-discovery at TD Bank Group.
Not exact matches
[8] See for example this article: Ken Chasse, «Why a Legal Opinion is Necessary for
Electronic Records Management Systems» (2012), 9 Digital
Evidence and
Electronic Signature Law Review 17, a U.K. «open source» journal, i.e., providing free downloading
of articles (click «Archives» to access the contents
of volume 9).
No law firm has the necessary degree
of specialization
of staff, legal materials used, re-use
of previously created work - product, or scaled
volumes of production, to be able to cope with rapidly expanding
volumes of laws, complexity
of laws based upon technology, and the masses
of records created by the automating
of records by
electronic technology — every interaction, communication, and transmission that we have now, produces a record, which could be related to some legal service, and records are now the most frequently used kind
of evidence in legal proceedings.
A new issue, designated
volume 7, 2010,
of Digital
Evidence and
Electronic Signature Law Review has been published.