Not exact matches
Bitcoin hosts («
miners») essentially «
vote» on any system changes
by choosing what software to run.
Democrats from coal - producing states, led
by West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin, had delayed the Senate
vote on the funding bill in a failed attempt to get a bigger extension of
miners» healthcare benefits that expire at the end of this year.
Satoshi Nakamoto's idealistic vision of «one CPU one
vote» has been superseded
by a reality where the manufacture and distribution of mining equipment have become dominated
by a very small number of entities, some of which have engaged in abusive practices against individual
miners and the Bitcoin network as a whole.
Government has come under attack
by thousands of Ghanaians engaging in illegal mining threatening to
vote against the ruling party in the next elections despite their (illegal
miners) hazardous activities on the environment.
It also includes money to permanently extend health benefits for retired
miners, a top priority of Senate Democrats facing reelection next year such as Sens. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinTrump to hold Nashville rally amid efforts to boost GOP Senate hopeful Voters Dems need aren't impressed
by anti-waterboarding showboating Overnight Finance: House rejects farm bill in conservative revolt NAFTA deal remains elusive as talks drag on Dodd - Frank rollback set for House
vote MORE (W.Va.)
Earlier this week, a blog post entitled Segregated Witness's soft fork and a
vote of no confidence
by the software engineer Steve Sokolowski climbed to the front page of the popular online bitcoin community Reddit BTC (/ r / BTC), which entailed numerous inaccuracies in regards to the impact of the Segregated Witness on bitcoin users, businesses, and
miners.
Bitcoin's oldest mining pool, Slush Pool, will let its
miners vote on the Segregated Witness soft fork proposed
by Bitcoin Core.
While Segregated Witness is now available for
miners and nodes to
vote on, the proposal (one long favored
by its development team) has thus far failed to obtain the signaling needed for approval from
miners.
Maybe we do need some technological measures, such as
miner voting, maybe proof - of - stake
voting, but beyond that, it's really hard to imagine how you actually create durable social institutions when they're so easily undermined at protocol, almost
by design.»
We propose a mathematical formalism for the
voting process in BIP 100 that can be used to algorithmically determine the best block size limit that would be considered appropriate
by all
voting miners.
«Satoshi Nakamoto's idealistic vision of «one CPU one
vote» has been superseded
by a reality where the manufacture and distribution of mining equipment has become dominated
by a very small number of entities, some of which have engaged in abusive practices against individual
miners and the Bitcoin network as a whole.»
Bitcoin Cash has taken the approach of allowing block size to be
voted on
by miners with a hard cap at 32 MB.
By requiring
votes and limiting the pool of
miners to 20, the number of entities that are able to affect the blockchain in a potentially harmful way is greatly reduced.